Objective: To consider the effectiveness of a goal planning programme for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and address some of the current evidence gaps in goal setting.
Design: Retrospective audit.
Subjects: Consecutive series of 65 newly injured SCI patients.
Main outcome measures: The Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC) has been specifically developed for the SCI population, and is used to assess patient attainment in core rehabilitation areas. A ‘Goal Planning Progress’ form was also used to specifically detail the goal planning process.
Results: Across the 65 patients, 396 goal planning meetings were held with 6176 goals set in total. Seventy-two per cent of the goals set at the first goal planning meeting were achieved by the second meeting. The rate of achievement at subsequent meetings was 68%. Significant differences in the number of planned rehabilitation days, number of goal planning meetings, and goals set were identified between injury categories. Significant positive correlations were found between the number of goals set and achievement, as measured by the NAC, in certain rehabilitation domains.
Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that the Needs Assessment and Goal Planning framework is effective in planning SCI rehabilitation. The capacity of this goal planning system to reflect individual need has also been established. Further systematic analyses of this process could potentially lead to more efficient rehabilitation and the identification of care pathways within clinical areas.
References
1.
Wade DT. Editorial: Evidence relating to goal planning in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 273-275.
2.
Locke E, Latham G. A theory of goal setting and task performance. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
3.
Locke E, Frederick E, Bobko P, Lee C. Effect of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance. J Psychol1984; 69: 241-251.
4.
Keith RA, Lipsey MW. The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment and outcomes. In: Gluekauf RL, Secrest LB, Bond GR, McDonel EC eds. Improving assessment of rehabilitation and health. California: Sage, 1993: 33-60.
5.
McG rath JR, Adams L. Patient-centred goal planning: a systematic psychological therapy?Top Stroke Rehabil1999; 6: 43-50.
6.
McG rath JR, Marks JA, Davis AM. Towards interdisciplinary rehabilitation: further developments at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre. Clin Rehabil1995; 9: 320-326.
7.
Willer B, Miller GH. Client involvement in goal setting and its relationship to therapeutic outcome. J Clin Psychol, 1976; 32: 687-690.
8.
Foley A. A review of goal planning in the rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured person. J Orthop Nurs1998; 2: 148-152.
9.
Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, Davey P, Espley A. Self-efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalisation: a prospective study. Br J Health Psychol2001; 6: 25-40.
10.
Webb PM, Glueckauf RL. The effects of direct involvement in goal setting on rehabilitation outcome for persons with traumatic brain injuries. Rehabil Psychol1994, 39: 179-188.
11.
Norris-Baker C, Stephens MA, Rintala DH, Willems EP. Patient behavior as a predictor of outcomes in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys M ed Rehabil1981; 62: 602-608.
12.
Duff J, Kennedy P, Swalwell E. Clinical audit of physical rehabilitation: patients' views of goal planning. Clin Psychol Forum1999; 129: 34-38.
13.
MacLeod GM, MacLeod L. Evaluation of client and staff satisfaction with a goal-planning project implemented with people with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord1996; 34: 525-530.
14.
Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G, Pie JS, Btesh Y, Almog A. Effect of goal difficulty, goal specificity and duration of practice time intervals on muscular endurance performance. J Sports Sci1997; 15: 125-135.
Stetcher VJ, Seijts GH, Kok GJ et al. Goal setting as a strategy for health behaviour change. Health Educ Q1995; 22: 190-200.
17.
Bower E, McLellan DL, Arney J, Campbell MJ. A randomised controlled trail of different intensities of physiotherapy and different goal-setting procedures in 44 children with cerebral palsy. Dev M ed Child Neurol1996; 38: 226-237.
18.
Theodorakis Y, Malliou P, Papaioannou A, Beneca A, Filactakidou A. The effect of personal goals, self efficacy, and self satisfaction on injury rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil1996; 5: 214-223.
19.
Bar-Eli M, Hartman I, Levy-Kolker N. Using goal setting to improve physical performance of adolescents with behaviour disorders: the effect of goal proximity. Adapted Phys Activity Q1994; 11: 86-97.
20.
Squires A, Rumgay B, Perombelon M. Audit of contract goal setting by physiotherapists working with elderly patients. Physiotherapy1991; 77: 790-795.
21.
Wade DT. Editorial: Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 183-186.
22.
Kennedy P, Walker L, White D. Ecological evaluation of goal planning and advocacy in a rehabilitative environment for spinal cord injured people. Paraplegia1991; 29: 197-292.
23.
Kennedy P, Hamilton LR. The needs assessment checklist: a clinical approach to measuring outcome. Spinal Cord199937: 136-139.
24.
Go BK, DeVivo MJ, Richards JS. The epidemiology of spinal cord injury. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG eds. Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the model systems. Eaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1995: 21-55.
25.
Grundy D, Swain A. ABC of spinal cord injury, third edition. London: BMJ, 1996.
26.
Berry C, Kennedy P. A psychometric analysis of the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). Spinal Cord2003; 41: 409-501.
27.
Kennedy P, Henderson J, Gallagher S. Improving goal attainment with spinal cord injured patients. J Assoc Qual Healthcare1996; 3: 145-150.
28.
Kennedy P, Swalwell E. Clinical audit of physical rehabilitation: Goal planning and needs assessment. Auditorium1995; 2: 25-28.
