Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients.
Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions.
Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test.
Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85–8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4 4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1 –14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO.
Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO.
References
1.
1 Bohannon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm JB. Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res1991; 14: 246–250.
2.
2 Leung J, Moseley A. Impact of ankle-foot orthoses on gait and leg muscle activity in adults with hemiplegia: systematic literature review. Physiotherapy2003; 89: 39–55.
3.
3 Beckerman H, Becher J, Lankhorst GJ, Verbeek ALM. Walking ability of stroke patients: efficacy of tibial nerve blocking and a polypropylene ankle-foot orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1996; 77: 1144–1151.
4.
4 Corcoran PJ, Jebsen RH, Brengelmann GL, Simons BC. Effects of plastic and metal leg braces on speed and energy cost of hemiparetic ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1970; 51:69–77.
5.
5 Lehmann JF, Condon SM, Price R, deLateur BJ. Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: their correction by ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 763–771.
6.
6 Mojica JA, Nakamura R, Kobayashi T, Handa T, Morohashi I, Watanabe S. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) on body sway and walking capacity of hemiparetic stroke patients. Tohoku J Exp Med1988; 156: 395–401.
7.
7 Diamond MF, Ottenbacher KJ. Effect of a tone-inhibiting dynamic ankle-foot orthosis on stride characteristics of an adult with hemiparesis. Phys Ther1990; 70: 423–430.
8.
8 Hesse S, Luecke D, Jahnke MT, Mauritz KH. Gait function in spastic hemiparetic patients walking barefoot, with firm shoes, and with ankle-foot orthosis. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 133–141.
9.
9 Dieli J, Ayyappa E, Hornbeak S. Effect of dynamic ankle-foot-orthoses on three hemiplegic adults. J Prosthet Orthot1997; 9: 82–89.
10.
10 Yamamoto S, Ebina M, Kubo S et al. Development of an ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion assist, part 2: structure and evaluation. J Prosthet Orthot1999; 11: 24–28.
11.
11 Tyson S, Thornton H. The effect of a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: objective measures and users'opinions. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 53–58.
12.
12 Wong AM, Tang FT, Wu SH, Chen CM. Clinical trial of a low-temperature plastic anterior ankle foot orthosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1992; 71: 41–43.
13.
13 Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther1984; 64: 35–40.
14.
14 Koning M, Blauw M. Taalonderzoek en communicatie-onderzoek. In: Blauw M, Koning M eds. Afasie, een multidisciplinaire benadering. Nieuw Loosdrecht: Stichting Afasie Nederland, 1988.
15.
15 Dick JPR, Guiloff RJ, Stewart A et al. Mini-mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1984; 47: 496–499.
16.
16 Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1990; 53: 576–580.
17.
17 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142–148.
18.
18 Richards CL, Malouin F, Dean C. Gait in stroke, assessment and rehabilitation. Clin Geriatr Med1999; 15: 833–855.
19.
19 Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke1995; 26: 982–989.
20.
20 Geiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J, Hicks RR. Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training. Phys Ther2001; 81: 995–1005.
21.
21 Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Salbach NM, Finch L, Wood-Dauphinée SL. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): A comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther2003; 83: 617–630.
22.
22 Lehmann JF. Biomechanics of ankle-foot orthoses: prescription and design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979 May; 60: 200–207.
