Objective: The development of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) has led to the assessment of a wider range of relevant rehabilitation outcomes, but a need for a further broadening exists. In this article, a new proposal for an extended ICIDH is made.
Method: Review of the literature on quality of life and of attempts to integrate the World Health Organization (WHO) biopsychosocial model and the ICIDH.
Results: Our review shows three operationalizations of the concept of quality of life: as health, as well-being and, preferably, as a superordinate construct. None of the attempts to integrate the WHO biopsychosocial model have been entirely successful. Our new proposal is characterized by (a) incorporation of the organ, person and social levels of the ICIDH, (b) distinction between objective and subjective aspects of quality of life as a second axis in the model, resulting in somatic sensations as the subjective part of the organ level, perceived health as the subjective part of the person level and domainspecific life satisfaction as the subjective part of the social level, and (c) separation of the concept of general well-being or happiness as being distinct from the ICIDH. The proposal model is intended to serve as a framework in which different outcomes can be positioned in relation to each other.
Conclusion: Our model is intuitively appealing and remains close to familiar concepts and models. However, it is as yet far from perfect, and we hope to provoke discussion to help further refinement.
References
1.
Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
2.
Bennekom CAM, Jelles F. Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam, 1995.
3.
Johnston MV, Granger CV. Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: a primer and introduction to a series. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1994; 732: 296–303.
4.
Keith RA. Conceptual basis of outcome measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1995; 74: 73–80.
5.
Keith RA. Functional status and health status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 478–483.
6.
Witte LP de. After the rehabilitation centre: a study into the course of functioning after discharge from rehabilitation. Amsterdam/Lisse: Zwets & Zeitlinger, 1991.
7.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
8.
Granger CV, Gresham GE eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.
9.
Whiteneck GG. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 1073–1076.
10.
Whiteneck GG, Sharlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser D, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new meausre of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 519–526.
11.
Jette AM. Concepts of health and methodological issues in functional assessment. In: Granger CV, Gresham G eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.
World Health Organization. The first ten years of the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1958.
14.
Engle G. The biopsychosocial model and medical education. N Engl J Med1982; 306: 802–806.
15.
Boot JMD, Klinkert JJ. Inleiding in de medische sociologie [Introduction in medical sociology]. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1994.
16.
König-Zahn C, Furer JW, Tax B. Het meten van de gezondheidstoestand 1: algemene gezondheid. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1993.
17.
Patrick DL, Erickson P. Assessing health-related quality of life for clinical decision-making. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM eds. Quality of life assessment: key issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1993.
18.
Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care1981; 19: 787–805.
19.
Bruin AD de, Witte LP de, Stevens FCJ, Diederiks JPM. Sickness impact profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Soc Sci Med1992; 35: 1003–1014.
20.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992; 30: 473–483.
21.
Ware JE. The SF-36 Health Survey. In: Spilker B ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven, 1996.
22.
Crewe N. Quality of life: the ultimate goal in rehabilitation. Minerva Med1980; 586–589.
23.
Eisenberg MG, Saltz CC. Quality of life among aging spinal cord injured persons: long term rehabilitation outcomes. Paraplegia1991; 29: 514–520.
24.
Jette AM. Using health-related quality of life measures in physical therapy outcomes research. Phys Ther1993; 73: 528–537.
25.
Haan R de, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Langton Hewer R, Crevel H van. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke1993; 24: 320–327.
26.
Ustün TB, Cooper JE, Duuren-Kristen S van, Kennedy C, Hendershot G, Sartorius N. Revision of the ICIDH: mental health aspects. Disabil Rehabil1995; 17: 202–209.
27.
Peters DJ. Disablement observed, addressed, and experienced: integrating subjective experience into disablement models. Disabil Rehabil1996; 18: 593–603.
28.
Talo S, Rytökoski U, Puuka P et al. An empirical investigation of the ‘Biopsychosocial Disease Consequence Model’: psychological impairment, disability and handicap in chronic pain patients. Disabil Rehabil1995; 17: 281–292.
29.
Tennant A, McKenna SP. Conceptualising and defining outcome. Br J Rheumatol1995; 34: 899–900.
30.
Turner RR. Rehabilitation. In: Spilker B ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. New York: Lippincott-Raven, 1990.
31.
Hunt SM. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res1997; 6: 205–212.
32.
Banta HD. Quality of life I: perspectives. Pharm World Sci1993; 15: 45–49.
33.
Dimenäs ES, Dahlöf CG, Jern SC, Wiklund IK. Defining quality of life in medicine. Scand J Prim Health Care1990;suppl 1: 7–10.
34.
Essink-Bot M-L. Health status as a measure of outcome of disease and treatment. Dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1995.
35.
Spilker B, Revicki DA. Taxonomy of quality of life. In: Spilker B ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, second edition. New York: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
36.
Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Fitzpatrick R, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation. BMJ1992; 305: 1145–1148.
37.
Knippenberg FCE van, Haes JCJM de. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: psychometric properties of instruments. J Clin Epidemiol1988; 41: 1043–1053.
38.
Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM. Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, second edition. New York: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
39.
Spilker B. Introduction. In: Spilker B ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, second edition. New York: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
40.
Padilla GV, Presant C, Grant MM, Metter G, Lipsett J, Heide F. Quality of life index for patients with cancer. Res Nurs Health1983; 6: 117–126.
41.
Wyatt GKH, Friedman LL. Development and testing of a quality of life model for long-term female cancer survivors. Qual Life Res1996; 5: 387–394.
42.
Najman JM, Levine S. Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: A review and critique. Soc Sci Med1981; 15: 107–115.
43.
McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
44.
World Health Organization. Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1981.
Saracci R. The World Health Organization needs to reconsider its definition of health. BMJ1997; 314: 1409–1410.
47.
Campbell A, Converse PE, Rogers WL. The quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.
48.
Tennant A. Quality of life – a measure too far?Ann Rheum Dis1995; 54: 439–440.
49.
Szalaï A. The meaning of comparative research on the quality of life. In: Andrews FM, Szalaï A eds. The quality of life: comparative studies. London: Sage, 1980.
50.
Fuhrer MJ. Subjective well-being: Implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1994; 73: 358–364.
51.
Veenhoven R. Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.
52.
Calman KC. Definitions and dimensions of quality of life. In: Aaronson NK, Beckmann J eds. The quality of life of cancer patients. New York: Raven Press, 1987.
53.
Hunt SM, McKenna SP. The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy1992; 22: 307–319.
54.
McKenna SP, Hunt SM. A new measure of quality of life in depression: testing the reliability and construct validity of the QLDS. Health Policy1992; 22: 321–330.
55.
Parsons T. Health and disease: a sociological and action perspective. In: Parsons T ed. Action theory and the human condition. New York: The Free Press, 1978.
56.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer KS. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult Northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil1991; 5: 25–33.
57.
Ware J. Methodological considerations in the selection of health status assessment procedures. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J eds. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: LeJacq, 1984.
58.
Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys Ther1994; 74: 380–386.
59.
Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB ed. Sociology and rehabilitation. Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1965.
60.
Aaronson NK, Meyerowitz BE, Bard M. Quality of life research in oncology: Past achievements and future priorities. Cancer1991; 67: 839–843.
61.
Romney DM, Evans DR. Toward a general model of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res1996; 5: 235–241.
62.
Webb CR, Wrigley M, Yoels W, Fine P. Explaining quality of life for persons with traumatic brain injuries 2 years after injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 1113–1119.
63.
Molzahn AE, Northcott HC, Hayduk L. Quality of life of patients with end stage renal disease: A structural equation model. Qual Life Res1996; 5: 426–432.
64.
Post MWM, Witte LP de, Asbeck FWA van, Dijk AJ van, Schrijvers AJP. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 78: 395–402.
