Patients with Cancer: their approaches to participation in treatment plan decisions

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore experiences of participation in treatment planning decisions from the perspective of patients recently treated for colorectal cancer. Ten patients were purposively selected and interviewed. Constant comparative analysis, the core concept of grounded theory, was used. The dimensions were developed and organized into the main theme of ‘compliant participation in serious decisions’, which was composed of the two variations: complying with participation; and complying without participation. Complying with participation was characterized by feelings of self-confidence and self-competence and by open dialogue between the participants, significant others and the physician. Complying without participation was characterized by participants’ feelings of uncertainty and distress, and of being rushed into submitting to decisions without having time to reflect on the information provided or the opportunity to influence the treatment and care process. To participate (or choosing not to participate) builds on open and affirming dialogue, information and knowledge about the illness. Patient participation in treatment and care decision making is interpreted as a health promoting way of coping with illness.

Keywords

constant comparative analysis decision making patient participation sense of coherence

References

Benner P , Wrubel J. The primacy of caring: stress and coping in health and illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989.

Watson J. Nursing: Human science and human care. A theory of nursing. New York: National League for Nursing , 1999.

Nordgren S , Fridlund B. Patients’ perceptions of self-determination as expressed in the context of care . J Adv Nurs 2001; 35: 117-125 .

Nortvedt P. Needs, closeness and responsibilties; an inquiry into some rival moral considerations in nursing care . Nurs Philos 2001; 2: 112-121 .

Degner LF , Sloan JA , Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale . Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29(3): 21-43 .

Beaver K , Luker KA , Owens RG , Leinster SJ , Degner LF , Sloan JA. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer . Cancer Nurs 1996; 19: 8-19 .

Bilodeau BA , Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer . Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 23: 691-696 .

Degner LF , Kristjanson LJ , Bowman D et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer . JAMA 1997; 277: 1485-1492 .

Hack TF , Degner LF. Coping with breast cancer: a cluster analytic approach . Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 54: 185-194 .

10.

Ramfelt E , Langius A , Björvell H , Nordström G. Treatment decision making and its relation to the sense of coherence and the meaning of the disease in a group of patients with colorectal cancer . Eur J Cancer Care 2000; 9: 158-165 .

11.

Wallberg B , Michelson H , Nystedt M , Bolund C , Degner LF , Wilking N. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients . Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 467-476 .

12.

Davison BJ , Degner LF. Feasibility of using a computer-assisted intervention to enhance the way women with breast cancer communicate with their physician . Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 417-424 .

13.

Sanders T , Skevington S. Do bowel cancer patients participate in treatment decision making? Findings from a qualitative study . Eur J Cancer Care 2003; 12: 166-175 .

14.

Sekimoto M , Asai A , Ohnishi M et al. Patients’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan . BioMed Central Fam Pract 2004; 5: 1-10 .

15.

Sahlberg-Blom E , Ternestedt B-M , Johansson J-E. Patient participation in decision making at the end of life as seen by a close relative . Nurs Ethics 2000; 7: 296-313 .

16.

Sainio C , Eriksson E , Lauri S. Patient participation in decision making about care. The patient’s point of view . Cancer Nurs 2001; 24: 172-179 .

17.

Sainio C , Lauri S , Eriksson E. Cancer patients’ views and experiences of participation in care and decision making . Nurs Ethics 2001; 8: 97-113 .

18.

Sainio C , Lauri S. Cancer patients’ decision making regarding treatment and nursing care . J Adv Nurs 2001; 41: 250-260 .

19.

Ramfelt E , Severinsson E , Lützén K. Attempting to find meaning in illness to achieve emotional coherence. The experiences of patients with colorectal cancer . Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 141-149 .

20.

Tourigny SC. Integrating ethics with symbolic interactionism: the case of oncology . Qualit Health Res 1994; 4: 163-185 .

21.

Fredriksson L. Modes of relating in a conversation: a research synthesis on presence, touch and listening . J Adv Nurs 1999; 30: 1167-1176 .

22.

Mead GH. Mind, self, and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1934.

23.

Charon JM. Symbolic interactionism, an introduction, an interpretation, an integration, eighth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall , 2004.

24.

Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Vally, CA: Sociology Press , 1992.

25.

Glaser BG , Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine , 1967.

26.

Lomborg K , Kirkevold M. Truth and validity in grounded theory - a reconsidered realist interpretation of the criteria: fit, work, relevance and modifiability . Nurs Philos 2003; 4: 189-200 .

27.

Schreiber R. The ‘how to’ of grounded theory: avoiding the pitfalls. In: Schreiber R , Stern PN eds. Using grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer Publishing , 2001: 63-67.

28.

Morse JM , Barrett M , Mayan M , Olson K , Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research . Int J Qualit Methods 2002; 1(2): 1-19 . Retrieved 8 October, 2004, from: http://www.ualberta.ca/-ijqm/

29.

Thorne S , Reimer Kirkham S , MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge . Res Nurs Health 1997; 20: 169-177 .

30.

Damasio A. The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann , 1999.

31.

Antonovsky A. Health stress and coping. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 1979.

32.

Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 1987.

33.

Pellegrino ED , Thomasma DC. The virtues in medical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1993.

34.

Nortvedt P. Clinical sensitivity: the inseparability of ethical perspectiveness and clinical knowledge . Sch Inq Nurs Pract 2001; 15: 25-43 .

35.

van Kleffens T , van Baarsen B , van Leeuwen E. The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients’ and physicians’ perspective . Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 2325-2336 .

36.

Festinger L. Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1964.

37.

Thorne S. Communication in cancer care: what science can and cannot teach us . Cancer Nurs 1999; 22: 370-378 .

38.

Andershed B , Ternestedt B-M. Being a close relative of a dying person: development of the concepts ‘involvement in the light and in the dark’ . Cancer Nurs 2000; 23: 151-159 .

39.

Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press , 1991.