A pragmatic approach to interactive assembly sequence evaluation

Abstract

An assembly-oriented design system has been developed which includes several analysis tools to improve product assemblability during product development. One of these tools supports the parallel development of the product design and the assembly sequence, thus exploiting the benefits of concurrent consideration of product and process. However, this approach requires some method for evaluating the sequence against requirements. Previous work on assembly sequence evaluation has concentrated on identifying the best from a set of ranked alternatives. When a single sequence is constructed, as with this tool, another method is needed.

This paper reports the development of this novel methodology for evaluating individual assembly sequences. A review of the relevant literature has found several measures for identifying good assembly sequences from a ranked list and the fundamental sequence attributes extrapolated and aggregated. This leads to the proposal of four new indices: insertion index, stability index, difficulty index and complexity index. A large number of assembly sequences have been analysed to define limiting values for the indices such that they can quantify the potential of an incomplete sequence resulting in a satisfactory solution. The application of these indices in concurrent design and assembly planning is illustrated through an industrial case study.

Keywords

assembly sequence generation sequence evaluation concurrent engineering

References

Whitney

The potential for assembly modelling in product development and manufacturing www.mit.edu/ctpid/www.papers.html, 1996

Design for Manufacture and Assembly Practitioners Manual, Version 10, 1993 (Lucas Engineering Systems Limited, University of Hull, Hull).

Boothroyd

Product design for manufacture and assembly. Computer-Aided Des., 1994, 26(9), 505–520.

Barnes

C. J.

A methodology for the concurrent design of products and their assembly sequences. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, 2000.

Barnes

C. J.

Dalgleish

G. F.

Jared

G. E. M.

Mei

Swift

K. G.

Assembly oriented design. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, 1999, pp. 45–50 (IEEE, New York).

Brown

N. J.

Jared

G. E. M.

Swift

K. G.

Tate

S. J.

An introduction to the designers'sandpit. In Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2000.

Jones

R. E.

Wilson

R. H.

Calton

T. L.

On constraints in assembly planning. IEEE Trans. Robotics Automn, 1998, 14(6), 849–863.

Bonneville

Perrard

Henrioud

J. M.

A genetic algorithm to generate and evaluate assembly plans. In Proceedings of the INRIA-IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 231–239.

de Mello

Homem L.

Sanderson

A. C.

Evaluation and selection of assembly plans. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1990, Vol. 3, pp. 1588–1593 (IEEE, New York).

10.

Park

J. H.

Kwon

D. G.

Chung

M. J.

A framework for the evaluation and selection of assembly plans. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (IECON ′91), 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 1215–1220.

11.

Wolter

On the automatic generation of assembly plans. In Computer Aided Mechanical Assembly Planning (Eds de Mello

Homem L. S.

Lee

), 1991 (Kluwer, Dordrecht).

12.

Mosemann

Rohrdanz

Wahl

Assembly stability as a constraint for assembly sequence planning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998, Vol. 1, pp. 233–238 (IEEE, New York).

13.

Hong

D. S.

Cho

H. S.

A neural network based computation scheme for generating optimised robotic assembly sequences. Engng Applic. Artif. Intell., 1995, 8(2), 129–145.

14.

De Fazio

Rhee

Whitney

A design-specific approach to design for assembly (DFA) for complex mechanical assemblies. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, 1997, pp. 152–157 (IEEE, New York).

15.

Raghavan

Molineros

Sharma

Interactive evaluation of assembly sequences using augmented reality. IEEE Trans. Robotics Automn, 1999, 15(3), 435–449.

16.

Hong

D. S.

Cho

H. S.

A neural network based computation scheme for generating optimised robotic assembly sequences. Engng Applic. Artif. Intell., 1995, 8(2), 129–145.

17.

Lazzaerini

Marcelloni

A genetic algorithm for generating optimum assembly plans. Artif. Intell. Engng, 2000, 14, 319–329.

18.

Goldwasser

Motwani

Complexity measures for assembly sequences. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Applic., 1999, 9(4–5), 371–417.

19.

Grewal

Tran

Bhaskare

Farmer

Assembly planning software. Ann. CIRP, 1995, 44(1), 1–6.

20.

Kanai

Takahash

Makino

ASPEN: Computer aided assembly sequence plan and evaluation system based on pre determined time standards. Ann. CIRP, 1996, 45(2), 35–39.

21.

Gottipolu

An approach for assembly sequence planning using solid models. PhD thesis, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1994.

22.

Yusof

Criteria for evaluating assembly sequence in DFA. Thesis, University of Hull, Hull, North Humberside, 1997.

23.

Motavalli

Islam

A.-U.

Multi criteria assembly sequencing. Computers Ind. Engng, 1997, 32(4), 743–751.

24.

Schmidt

L. C.

Jackman

Evaluating assembly sequences for automatic assembly systems. Inst. Ind. Engrs Trans, 1995, 27, 23–31.