This study aims to identify and understand the key factors that need to be considered when deciding production allocation in the pharmaceutical industry as well as to develop a managerial framework to guide the location decision in the same industry. A total of ten case studies have been performed in an international pharmaceutical company based in Singapore over an 8-month period. The case studies revealed that production allocation decisions are largely driven by the desire to maximize benefits through the exploitation as well as the development of manufacturing capabilities at both the plant and network level. The study also identified and detailed the influence of legislation requirements, market, and product specifications on these decisions. It was observed that the degree of influence varies from case to case, resulting in two categories of decision criteria: qualifying (i.e. must meet) and ranking (differentiation) criteria. A framework is created to aid managers to decide the best location, maximizing the overall manufacturing network as well as the single plant capabilities.
EppingG., ‘Important factors in plant location in 1980’Growth Change13 (2) (1982): 47–51.
9.
BartmessA.CernyK., ‘Building competitive advantage through a global network of capabilities’California Mgmt Rev.35 (2) (1993): 78–102.
10.
VosG., ‘A production-allocation approach for international manufacturing strategy’Int. J. Oper. Prod. Mgmt11 (3) (1991): 125–134.
11.
FriedmanJ.GerlowskiD.SilbermanJ., ‘What attracts foreign multinational corporations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States’J. Regional Sci.32 (4) (1992): 403–418.
12.
JungthirapanichC.BenjaminS., ‘A knowledge-based decision support system for locating a manufacturing facility’IIE Trans.27 (6) (1995): 789–799.
13.
McCarthyB. L.AtthirawongW., ‘Factors affecting location decisions in international operations—a Delphi study’Int. J. Oper. Prod. Mgmt23 (7) (2003): 794–818.
14.
BrandeauM.ChiuS., ‘An overview of representative problems in location research’Mgmt Sci.35 (6) (1989): 645–662.
15.
HouY.ChangY., ‘The new efficient hierarchy combination encoding method of evolution strategies for production allocation problems’Comput. Ind. Engng43 (2002): 577–589.
16.
AhmadiR. H.TangC., ‘Production allocation with dual provisioning’Eur. J. Oper. Res.75 (1994): 186–199.
17.
PongpanichC., Manufacturing location decisions: Choosing the right location for international manufacturing facilities, Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge University, 2000.
18.
FerdowsK.FerdowsK., Mapping international factory networks, in Managing international manufacturing (Amsterdam: Elsevier1989).
19.
ColotlaI.ShiY.GregoryM., ‘Operation and performance of international manufacturing network and capability perspective’. In Proceedings of EurOMA ninth international annual conference, Copenhagen, June 2–4 2002, Vol. 1, pp. 289–302Vol. 1, Department of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School).
20.
MeijboomB.VosB., ‘International manufacturing and location decisions: Balancing configuration and co-ordination aspects’Int. J. Oper. Prod. Mgmt17 (8) (1997): 790–805.
21.
RudbergM.OlhagerJ., ‘Manufacturing networks and supply chains: An operations strategy perspective’Omega31 (1) (2003): 29–39.
CookeJ. A., ‘In this issue’Supply chain Mgmt Rev.1 (1) (1997): 3.
27.
EisenhardtK., ‘Building theories from case study research’Acad. Mgmt Rev.14 (4) (1989): 532–550.
28.
GillJ.JohnsonP., Research methods for managers (London: Paul Chapman1991).
29.
YinR. K., Case study research: Design and methods (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage1994).
30.
BarkleyD.McNamaraK., ‘Manufacturers' location decision: Do surveys provide helpful insights?’Int. Regional Sci. Rev.17 (1) (1994): 23–47.
31.
Leonard-BartonD., ‘A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites’Organi. Sci.1 (3) (1990): 248–266.
32.
HandfieldR.MelynkS., ‘The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM’J. Oper. Mgmt16 (4) (1998): 321–340.
33.
AgouridasV., ‘Enhancing design research in the context of design education’J. Mech. Des.129 (7) (2007): 717–729.
34.
StraussA.CorbinJ., Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (1990):.
35.
MinshallT., Manufacturing mobility: A strategic guide to transferring manufacturing capability, Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge University, 1998.
