Multi-body co-simulation of semi-active suspension systems

Abstract

This paper describes the development and use of a multi-body co-simulation approach for predicting the dynamic response of a vehicle containing magnetorheological (MR) semi-active dampers. The approach is used to investigate the effects of various local and global control strategies on the load histories of suspension components for the purpose of assessing their likely impact on fatigue life. The approach adopted aims to exploit the capability of a multi-body system (MBS) code and a mathematical simulation code, by integrating the MBS vehicle models with selected semi-active damper/controller models. Various MBS vehicle models are developed of increasing complexity using MSC.visualNastran, which are linked to three local, two-state switchable, control algorithms and also two global controllers, each developed in MATLAB/Simulink. The control strategies are implemented within the vehicle model using an MR damper model derived from experimental test data. Road inputs, including both bump/pothole and random road excitation, and the tyre model are also implemented within MATLAB/Simulink. Ultimately, the aim is to develop an approach which would allow concurrent structural optimization and controller optimization to enable lighter and more durable suspension components to be produced.

Keywords

co-simulation multi-body system semi-active control systems magnetorheological damper service loads load histories pitch and roll control two-state switchable

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Haiba

Barton

D. C.

Brooks

P. C.

Levesley

M. C.

Using a quarter-vehicle multi-body model to estimate the service loads of a suspension arm for durability calculations

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics, 2003, 217, 121–133.

Levesley

M. C.

Kember

S. A.

Barton

D. C.

Brooks

P. C.

Querin

O. M.

Dynamic simulation of vehicle suspension systems for durability analysis

Mater. Sci. Forum, 2003, 440-441, 103–110.

Sharp

Hassan

An evaluation of passive automotive suspension systems with variable stiffness and damping parameters

Veh. Syst. Dyn., 1986, 15, 335–350.

Sammier

Sename

Dugard

Skyhook and H infinity control of semi-active suspensions: Some practical aspects

Veh. Sys. Dyn., 2003, 39, 279–308.

Karnopp

Crosby

Harwood

Vibration control using semi-active force generators

ASME J. Eng. Ind., Trans. ASME, 1974, 96, 619–626.

Cebon

Besinger

Cole

Control strategies for semi-active lorry suspensions

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 1996, 210 (D), 161–178.

Sharp

Hassan

Performance and design considerations for dissipative semi-active suspension systems for automobiles

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1987, 201 (D2), 149–153.

Sims

Stanway

Peel

Bullough

Johnson

Controllable viscous damping: An experimental study of an electrorheological long-stroke damper under proportional feedback control

Smart Mater. Struct., 1999, 8, 601–615.

Liao

Y.G.

H. I.

Cosimulation of multibody-based vehicle dynamics and an electric power steering control system

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part K: 2001, 215, 141–151.

10.

Maiorana

Minaker

B. P.

Zhang

Malik

M. A.

Cosimulation of active suspension. SAE technical paper series, 2005-01-0984, 2005, p. 9.

11.

Rahnejat

Multi-body dynamics: vehicles, machines and mechanisms. 1st edition, 1998, (Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, Bury St Edmunds and London).

12.

Inman

D. J.

Engineering vibration. 2nd edition, 2001 (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

13.

Gillespie

T. D.

Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. 1992 (Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale).

14.

Ramli

Pownall

Levesley

M. C.

Crolla

D. A.

Dynamic analysis of semi-active suspension systems using a co-simulation approach

3rd International Symposium on Multi-body dynamics: monitoring and simulation techniques, 2004 Loughborough, UK, pp. 391–400.

15.

Peel

D. J.

Bullough

W. A.

Prediction of electro-rheological valve performance in steady flow

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1994, 208, 253–266.

16.

John

Wereley

N. M.

Nondimensional quasisteady analysis of magnetorheological dampers utilizing a herschel bulkley model with preyield viscosity. Smart structures and materials 2003: damping and isolation, Proceeding of SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, Vol. 5052, pp. 53–65.

17.

Sims

N. D.

Holmes

N. J.

Stanway

A unified modelling and model updating procedure for electrorheological and magnetorheological vibration dampers

Smart Mater. Struct., 2004, 13, 100–121.

18.

Blundell

Harty

The multibody systems approach to vehicle dynamics, 2004 (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford).

19.

Sui

Hirshey

Evaluation on analytical tire models for vertical vibration simulation using virtual tire testing method. SAE technical paper series, 1999-01-0786, 1999.

20.

Nell

Steyn

J. L.

An alternative control strategy for semi-active dampers on off-road vehicles

J. Terramech., 1998, 35, 25–40.

21.

Ramli

Levesley

M. C.

Crolla

D. A.

Simulation and evaluation of passive and semi-active suspension of quarter and full vehicle ride models. NAFEMS World Congress 2005 - Engineering Simulation: Best Practices and Visions of the Future, St. Julians, Malta, 2005.