Automated Quantum Chemistry Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Electron Ionization Induced Fragmentations of the Nucleobases Uracil,Thymine,Cytosine,and Guanine
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2015
Automated Quantum Chemistry Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Electron Ionization Induced Fragmentations of the Nucleobases Uracil,Thymine,Cytosine,and Guanine
The gas-phase decomposition pathways of electron ionization (EI)-induced radical cations of the nucleobases uracil, thymine, cytosine, and guanine are investigated by means of mixed quantum-classical molecular dynamics. No preconceived fragmentation channels are used in the calculations. The results compare well to a plethora of experimental and theoretical data for these important biomolecules. With our combined stochastic and dynamic approach, one can access in an unbiased way the energetically available decomposition mechanisms. Additionally, we are able to separate the EI mass spectra of different tautomers of cytosine and guanine. Our method (previously termed quantum chemistry electron ionization mass spectra) reproduces free nucleobase experimental mass spectra well and provides detailed mechanistic in-sight into high-energy unimolecular decomposition processes.
SteenkenS., “Purine bases, nucleosides, and nucleotides: Aqueous solution redox chemistry and transformation reactions of their radical cations and e− and OH adduct”, Chem. Rev.89, 503 (1989). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr00093a003
KanvahS.JosephJ.SchusterG.B.BarnettR.N.ClevelandC.L.LandmanU., “Oxidation of DNA: Damage to nucleobases”, Acc. Chem. Res.43, 280 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar900175a
4.
FolkardM.PriseK.VojnovicB.DaviesS.RoperM.MichaelB., “Measurement of DNA damage by electrons with energies between 25 and 4000 eV”, Int. J. Radiat. Biol.64, 651 (1993). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553009314551891
5.
BoudaïffaB.CloutierP.HuntingD.HuelsM.A.SancheL., “Resonant formation of DNA strand breaks by low-energy (3 to 20 eV) electrons”, Science287, 1658 (2000). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5458.1658
6.
PtasińskaS.DeniflS.GohlkeS.ScheierP.IllenbergerE.MärkT.D., “Decomposition of thymidine by low-energy electrons: Implications for the molecular mechanisms of single-strand breaks in DNA”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.45, 1893 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200503930
7.
RiceJ.M.DudekG.O.BarberM., “Mass spectra of nucleic acid derivatives. Pyrimidines”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.87, 4569 (1965). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00948a029
8.
RiceJ.M.DudekG.O., “Mass spectra of nucleic acid derivatives. II. Guanine, adenine, and related compounds”J. Am. Chem. Soc.89, 2719 (1967). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00987a039
9.
BarrioM.D.C.G.ScopesD.I.C.HoltwickJ.B.LeonardN., “Syntheses of all singly labeled [15N]adenines: Mass spectral fragmentation of adenine”, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA78, 3986 (1981). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.7.3986
10.
SethiS.GuptaS.P.JenkinsE.E.WhiteheadC.W.TownsendL.B.McCloskeyJ.A., “Mass spectrometry of nucleic acid constituents. Electron ionization spectra of selectively labeled adenines”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.104, 3349 (1982). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00376a017
11.
CoupierB.FarizonB.FarizonM.GaillardM.GobetF.de Castro FariaN.JalbertG.OuaskitS.CarréM.GstirB.HanelG.DeniflS.FeketeovaL.ScheierP.MärkT., “Inelastic interactions of protons and electrons with biologically relevant molecules”, Eur. Phys. J. D20, 459 (2002). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2002-00166-3
12.
ImhoffM.DengZ.HuelsM.A., “Identification of ion fragments produced from thymine and deuterated thymine by low energy ion impact in films and electron impact in the gas phase”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.245, 68 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2005.07.002
13.
BarcB.RyszkaM.SpurrellJ.DampcM.VieiraP. LimãoParajuliR.MasonN.J.EdenS., “Multiphoton ionization and fragmentation of uracil: Neutral excited-state ring opening and hydration effects”, J. Chem. Phys.139, 244311 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4851476
14.
JochimsH.-W.SchwellM.BaumgärtelH.LeachS., “Photoion mass spectrometry of adenine, thymine and uracil in the 6–22 eV photon energy range”, Chem. Phys.314, 263 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.03.008
15.
ZhouC.MatsikaS.KoturM.WeinachtT.C., “Fragmentation pathways in the uracil radical cation”, J. Phys. Chem. A116, 9217 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp209213e
16.
AraniL.S.MignonP.Abdoul-CarimeH.FarizonB.FarizonM.ChermetteH., “DFT study of the fragmentation mechanism of uracil RNA base”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.14, 9855 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2cp40384f
17.
AraniL.S.MignonP.Abdoul-CarimeH.FarizonB.FarizonM.ChermetteH., “Hydrogen release from charged fragments of the uracil cation followed by their fragmentation: A DFT study”, Chem. Phys. Lett.583, 165 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2013.07.082
18.
Sadr-AraniL.MignonP.ChermetteH.DoukiT., “Theoretical and experimental study of the fragmentation of protonated uracil”, Chem. Phys. Lett.605–606, 108 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2014.05.026
19.
KoturM.WeinachtT.C.ZhouC.KistlerK.A.MatsikaS., “Distinguishing between relaxation pathways by combining dissociative ionization pump probe spectroscopy and ab initio calculations: A case study of cytosine”, J. Chem. Phys.134, 184309 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3586812
20.
WolkenJ.K.YaoC.TurečekF.PolceM.J.WesdemiotisC., “Cytosine neutral molecules and cation–radicals in the gas-phase: Structures, energetics, ion chemistry, and neutralization–reionization mass spectrometry”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.267, 30 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2007.02.016
21.
ImprotaR.ScalmaniG.BaroneV., “Radical cations of DNA bases: Some insights on structure and fragmentation patterns by density functional methods”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.201, 321 (2000). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00225-6
22.
ChengP.LiY.LiS.ZhangM.ZhouZ., “Collision-induced dissociation (CID) of guanine radical cation in the gas phase: An experimental and computational study”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.12, 4667 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b919513k
23.
MinaevB.F.ShafranyoshM.I.SvidaY.Y.SukhoviyaM.I.ShafranyoshI.I.BaryshnikovG.V.MinaevaV.A., “Fragmentation of the adenine and guanine molecules induced by electron collisions”, J. Chem. Phys.140, 175101 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4871881
24.
DawleyM.M.TanzerK.CantrellW.A.PlattnerP.BrinkmannN.R.ScheierP.DeniflS.PtasinskaS., “Electron ionization of the nucleobases adenine and hypoxanthine near the threshold: A combined experimental and theoretical study”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 25039 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03452J
25.
MarxD.HutterJ., Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics: Basic Theory and Advanced Methods.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609633
GrimmeS., “Towards first principles calculation of electron impact mass spectra of molecules”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.52, 6306 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201300158
28.
WangL.-P.TitovA.McGibbonR.LiuF.PandeV.S.MartínezT.J., “Discovering chemistry with an ab initio nanoreactor”, Nat. Chem.6, 1044 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2099
29.
HaseW.L.BuckowskiD.G., “Dynamics of ethyl radical decomposition. II. Applicability of classical mechanics to large-molecule unimolecular reaction dynamics”, J. Comput. Chem.3, 335 (1982). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540030308
30.
YangL.SunR.HaseW.L., “Use of direct dynamics simulations to determine unimolecular reaction paths and Arrhenius parameters for large molecules”, J. Chem. Theory Comput.7, 3478 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct200459v
31.
FlosadóttirH.DeniflS.ZappaF.WendtN.MauracherA.BacherA.JónssonH.MärkT.ScheierP.IngólfssonO., “Combined experimental and theoretical study on the nature and the metastable decay pathways of the amino acid ion fragment [M – H]−”, Chem. Int. Ed.46, 8057 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703327
32.
FlosadottirH.D.JonssonH.SigurdssonS.T.IngolfssonO., “Experimental and theoretical study of the metastable decay of negatively charged nucleosides in the gas phase”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 15283 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cp21298b
33.
BauerC.A.GrimmeS., “First principles calculation of electron ionization mass spectra for selected organic drug molecules”, Org. Biomol. Chem.12, 8737 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4OB01668H
34.
BauerC.A.GrimmeS., “Elucidation of electron ionization induced fragmentations of adenine by semiempirical and density functional molecular dynamics”, J. Phys. Chem. A118, 11479 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp505299p
ChoiM.Y.MillerR.E., “Four tautomers of isolated guanine from infrared laser spectroscopy in helium nanodroplets”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.128, 7320 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja060741l
37.
FeyerV.PlekanO.RichterR.CorenoM.ValllloseraG.PrinceK.C.TrofimovA.B.ZaytsevaI.L.MoskovskayaT.E.GromovE.V.SchirmerJ., “Tautomerism in cytosine and uracil: An experimental and theoretical core level spectroscopic study”, J. Phys. Chem. A113, 5736 (2009). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp900998a
38.
PlekanO.FeyerV.RichterR.CorenoM.ValllloseraG.PrinceK.C.TrofimovA.B.ZaytsevaI.L.MoskovskayaT.E.GromovE.V.SchirmerJ., “An experimental and theoretical core-level study of tautomerism in guanine”, J. Phys. Chem. A113, 9376 (2009). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp903209t
39.
ZhouJ.KostkoO.NicolasC.TangX.BelauL.de VriesM.S.AhmedM., “Experimental observation of guanine tautomers with VUV photoionization”, J. Phys. Chem. A113, 4829–4832 (2009). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp811107x
40.
TrygubenkoS.A.BogdanT.V.RuedaM.OrozcoM.LuqueF.J.SponerI.SlavicekP.HobzaP., “Correlated ab initio study of nucleic acid bases and their tautomers in the gas phase, in a microhydrated environment and in aqueous solution Part 1. Cytosine”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.4, 4192 (2002). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b202156k
41.
FogarasiG., “Relative stabilities of three low-energy tautomers of cytosine: A coupled cluster electron correlation study”, J. Phys. Chem. A106, 1381 (2002). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp013067x
42.
BravayaK.B.KostkoO.DolgikhS.LandauA.AhmedM.KrylovA.I., “Electronic structure and spectroscopy of nucleic acid bases: Ionization energies, ionization-induced structural changes, and photoelectron spectra”, J. Phys. Chem. A114, 12305 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp1063726
43.
PiacenzaM.GrimmeS., “Systematic quantum chemical study of DNA-base tautomers”, J. Comput. Chem.25, 83 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10365
44.
MarianC.M., “The guanine tautomer puzzle: Quantum chemical investigation of ground and excited states”, J. Phys. Chem.111, 1545 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp068620v
45.
MonsM.PiuzziF.DimicoliI.GorbL.LeszczynskiJ.“Near-UV resonant two-photon ionization spectroscopy of gas phase guanine: Evidence for the observation of three rare tautomers”, J. Phys. Chem. A110, 10921 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp063738x
46.
DreyfusM.BensaudeO.DodinG.DuboisJ.E., “Tautomerism in cytosine and 3-methylcytosine. A thermodynamic and kinetic study”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.98, 6338 (1976). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00436a045
47.
ColarussoP.ZhangK.GuoB.BernathP.F., “The infrared spectra of uracil, thymine, and adenine in the gas phase”, Chem. Phys. Lett.269, 39 (1997). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00245-5
PlekanO.FeyerV.RichterR.CorenoM.de SimoneM.PrinceK.TrofimovA.GromovE.ZaytsevaI.SchirmerJ., “A theoretical and experimental study of the near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of nucleobases: Thymine and adenine”, Chem. Phys.347, 360 (2008). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.09.021
50.
TaoJ.PerdewJ.P.StaroverovV.N.ScuseriaG.E., “Climbing the density functional ladder: Nonempirical meta-generalized gradient approximation designed for molecules and solids”, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 146401 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.146401
51.
GrimmeS.AntonyJ.EhrlichS.KriegH., “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H–Pu”, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344
52.
GrimmeS.EhrlichS.GoerigkL., “Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory”, J. Comput. Chem.32, 1456 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759
53.
BeckeA.D.JohnsonE.R., “A density-functional model of the dispersion interaction”, J. Chem. Phys.123, 154101 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2065267
54.
WeigendF.AhlrichsR., “Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.7, 3297 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b508541a
55.
AhlrichsR.FurcheF.HättigC.KlopperW.SierkaM.WeigendF., Turbomole, http://www.turbomole.com, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (2009).
HalkierA.HelgakerT.JørgensenP.KlopperW.KochH.OlsenJ.WilsonA.K., “Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O”, Chem. Phys. Lett.286, 243 (1998). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00111-0
58.
NeeseF.ValeevE.F.J., “Revisiting the atomic natural orbital approach for basis sets: Robust systematic basis sets for explicitly correlated and conventional correlated ab initio methods?”, Chem. Theory Comput.7, 33 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct100396y
59.
DunningT.H., “Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen”, J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007 (1989). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.456153
60.
NeeseF., ORCA – an ab initio, Density Functional and Semiempirical Program Package, Ver. 2.9 (Rev 0), Max Planck Institute for Bioinorganic Chemistry, Mülheim, Germany (2011).
VerletL., “Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamicalproperties of Lennard–Jones molecules”, Phys. Rev.159, 98 (1967). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.159.98
64.
ElstnerM.PorezagD.JungnickelG.ElsnerJ.HaugkM.FrauenheimT.SuhaiS.SeifertG., “Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties”, Phys. Rev. B58, 7260 (1998,). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.7260
65.
ElstnerM.HobzaP.FrauenheimT.SuhaiS.KaxirasE., “Hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions of nucleic acid base pairs: A density-functional-theory based treatment”, J. Chem. Phys.114, 5149 (2001). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1329889
66.
GausM.GoezA.ElstnerM., “Parametrization and benchmark of DFTB3 for organic molecules”, J. Chem. Theory Comput.9, 338 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct300849w
67.
TurroN. J., Modern Molecular Photochemistry.The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc.: Menlo Park, California (1978).
WarrenR.W.DunlapB.I., “Fractional occupation numbers and density functional energy gradients within the linear combination of Gaussian-type orbitals approach”, Chem. Phys. Lett.262, 384 (1996). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(96)01107-4
70.
RabuckA.D.ScuseriaG.E., “Improving self-consistent field convergence by varying occupation numbers”, J. Chem. Phys.110, 695 (1999). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.478177
71.
ThielW., MNDO2005, Version 7.0. Max Planck Institute für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim, Germany (2005).
72.
AradiB.HourahineB.FrauenheimT., “DFTB+, a sparse matrix-based implementation of the DFTB method”, J. Phys. Chem. A111, 5678 (2007,). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp070186p
73.
SteinS.E., in NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, Ed by LinstromP.J.MallardW.G., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, http://webbook.nist.gov (retrieved 15 May 2014).
74.
SteinS.E.ScottD.R., “Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.5, 859 (1994). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8
75.
DielsO.AlderK., “Synthesen in der hydroaromatischen Reihe, VI. Mitteilung, Kurt Alder und Gerhard Stein: Über partiell hydrierte Naphtho- und Anthrachinone mit Wasserstoff in γ- bzw. δ-Stellung. (Mitbearbeitet von Paul Pries und Hans Winckler)”, Chem. Ber.62, 2337 (1929). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cber.19290620872
