Abstract
This review considers whether HIV prevalence data on children in sub-Saharan Africa support the hypothesis that blood exposures account for a large proportion of HIV infections in Africa. Data from a systematic search on HIV-infected children support two analyses. In 25 studies where the mothers' HIV status was not matched with data on each child (excluding non-representative samples of children), the observed prevalence in children in 20 studies was greater than expected from vertical transmission. The population-weighted difference – 1.3% – was approximately one-third of observed prevalence in children. In 32 studies that match HIV-positive children with HIV-negative mothers, 406 discordant mother–child pairs were identified, and in studies identifying at least five non-vertical infections in children, 17.5% of HIV-positive children had HIV-negative mothers. In discussing an important role for unsafe health care in exceptionally rapid HIV transmission in Africa, leading AIDS researchers cite low HIV prevalence in children not yet sexually active. The assumption that childhood HIV prevalence would increase with age in children, if injections transmitted HIV is shown to be erroneous; it fails to account for early mortality in HIV-positive children. Evidence of child-to-child HIV transmission supports the theory that nosocomial infections are important to the AIDS pandemic, and procedures more prevalent than blood transfusions, such as injections, are likely involved.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Researchers providing evidence that blood exposures from unsterilized instruments are a major HIV transmission route in Africa have drawn attention to studies reporting HIV prevalence in children too high to be explained by mother-to-child transmission alone, and to hundreds of mother–child pairs in which only the child is HIV positive. 1 These data have been contested as unrepresentative or inaccurate. 2 Using selected data, others have argued that observed HIV prevalence in children is lower than would be expected if unsafe injections were making an important contribution to HIV prevalence in Africa. 3
The purpose of this review is to assemble and present data on HIV infection and medical injections in children, and to assess whether these data support a major role for iatrogenic (in this case, patient to patient) HIV transmission in Africa. The role of transfusion medicine in the early history of Africa's heterosexual AIDS pandemic has been recently examined. 4 The potential for more prevalent medical procedures such as injections administered with reused needles or syringes is a controversy of ongoing practical importance.
METHODS
This review analyses data from a systematic search for data on HIV prevalence in children in Africa from the US Census Bureau HIV/AIDS Surveillance Data Base, surveys identified through the Google Scholar web search engine (search terms: HIV, prevalence, children, Africa), abstracts from International AIDS Conferences XIV–XVII (search term: children) and personal files. 5,6 Electronic abstracts are not available for AIDS Conferences I–XIII. These data are analysed in two groups, depending on whether studies report the HIV status of the mothers of HIV-positive children, or report the prevalence among adults and children independently.
In the first analysis, of children for which only the prevalence among adults or mothers is known and mother–child pairs are not identified, the exclusion criteria are (1) any non-representative sample, such as prevalence in street children or in-patients; (2) lack of confirmatory test, unless the single test is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test; (3) absence of maternal or adult prevalence data for the same study population; or (4) sample sizes under 50 persons. These data are compared with the HIV prevalence that could be expected from mother-to-child transmission based on maternal or adult HIV prevalence (the Appendix details the assumptions underlying estimates of children's HIV prevalence from vertical transmission).
In the second analysis, of HIV-positive children matched with their biological mothers, the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis are (1) an unbiased sample of children tested for HIV regardless of the mother's serostatus; (2) a confirmatory HIV test, unless the single test is a PCR test; and (3) at least five discordant mother–child pairs.
Following these analyses, two themes in the interpretation of data on non-vertical HIV transmission are reviewed. The expectation that HIV prevalence increases with age in children where medical injections are transmitting HIV is assessed by modelling non-vertical HIV incidence and survival alongside mother-to-child transmission and survival. The expectation that injection risks to children are similar to or greater than risks to adults is also evaluated.
RESULTS
Prevalence data meeting the inclusion criteria for the first analysis (in which the HIV status of the mothers of HIV-positive children is not reported) are available for 28 groups of children – totaling almost 40,000 children – in 12 countries over three decades (Table 1). Children range up to 18 years old, and many studies combine data for a wide range of ages (e.g. children 2–12 years old). The observed prevalence is too high to be explained by vertical transmission alone in 20 of 25 groups of children, including seven of nine large (>1000 children) studies. The observed HIV prevalence was 1.3% greater than expected (population weighted mean), and the difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05 in 15 of 25 studies, cumulative z-score = 15.4 for the 25 studies combined). The average observed prevalence in children of all ages is 3.7%, meaning the excess prevalence is relatively large. Excluding groups of children under age 18 months that are not confirmed by PCR, the excess prevalence is reduced to 1–1%, but remains statistically significant (z score = 4.6).
Child HIV prevalence and expected prevalence from vertical transmission
*Current – adult prevalence at time of data collection on children in the same study population
To explain the observed excess prevalence by mother-to-child transmission, the product of the survival rate and the vertical transmission rate would have to be increased by +54%. This would involve adjustments equivalent to substituting a 38% rate of vertical transmission (compared with 30% observed, 95% confidence interval [CI] 20–40%) and a 39% five-year survival rate (compared with 31% observed, 95% CI 23–39%) (see the Appendix).
Prevalence data meeting the inclusion criteria for the second analysis (in which HIV status is known for child–mother pairs) are available for 15 of 33 studies reporting any discordant mother–child pairs (Table 2). These cases are rarely isolated, with a median of seven cases in every such study. More detailed descriptions of 16 of these studies are presented in an earlier review. 60 In 14 of these studies, the number of children who received blood transfusions is reported, an HIV transmission risk that can be ruled out for 148 of 312 cases. For studies included in the meta-analysis, a median of 17.5% of HIV-positive children have HIV-negative mothers.
HIV-positive children with HIV-negative mothers in sub-Saharan Africa, 1985–2009
PCR = polymerase chain reaction
*Median excluding studies with fewer than five discordant pairs and any with neither a confirmatory test nor a PCR test
Age distribution of HIV in children
In expert testimony and an authoritative review in Lancet, leading researchers in HIV epidemiology have pointed to low HIV prevalence in African children as evidence that unsafe health care cannot be a major HIV transmission route. 3 This view has been strikingly mangled in a report contracted to RTI by the Institute of Medicine for the US Senate, a document which proposes that HIV prevalence would increase with age if unsafe medical injections were infecting children, ignoring the more rapid progression to AIDS and death in the infected child and supposing that vertical transmission might not also occur. 61 An increasing trend could only be expected if children infected via vertical transmission were excluded from analyses. This can be shown by modelling non-vertical HIV incidence, similar to the incidence observed among children 2–14 years old in South Africa, alongside mother-to-child transmission. 62
Table 3 lists the HIV incidence from mother-to-child transmission on the diagonal and lists non-vertical incidence every year off the diagonal. For simplicity all vertical transmission is assumed to occur at birth. Representing a stable epidemic with 20% adult HIV prevalence, Table 3 predicts 7% incidence from mother-to-child transmission in every birth cohort. The difference from 7% in each cell on the diagonal is the difference in survival to year 10 for each birth cohort, depending on when the children were infected. The non-vertical transmission rate represented on the horizontal is 5% of the vertical transmission rate, i.e. 0.35% non-vertical HIV incidence in every subsequent year. Again, the difference from 0.35% in each cell on the horizontal is the difference in survival to year 10 for each age group, depending on when the children were infected. The estimated survival rates for vertically and non-vertically infected children are detailed in the Appendix.
Survival to ages 1–10 of HIV-infected children: 0.35% incidence, 7% MTC
MTC – mother-to-child transmission. Children born in year 8 (sample calculation in bold) have reached age 2 in year 10 (see top row). Of these 7% were infected vertically in year 8, another 0.35% were infected non-vertically in year 9, and 0.35% were infected non-vertically in year 10. While 94% of the 0.35% infected in year 9 (0.94 × 0.35 = 0.33) survive to year 10, only 48% of those infected vertically in year 8 (0.48 × 7 = 3.4) survive to be counted. For this reason there are fewer surviving HIV-positive children at age 2 (4.1%) than there are at age 1 (4.8%) in year 10
A 1.4% excess prevalence in children under age 10 is predicted, one-third of all infections. Thus even if one in three prevalent infections in children were from non-vertical HIV transmission, the prevalence of HIV in children would not increase with age. The modelled prevalence of non-vertical HIV infection in children aged 0–5 is 0.8%, out of a prevalence of 4.5% in this age group. In older children, the proportion infected non-vertically is 2.0% out of a prevalence of 3.4% among 6–10 year olds.
Implications for adults
The incidence of non-vertical HIV transmission to children has been proposed as an estimate of iatrogenic risks to African adults. 3 This assumes that children and adults have the same iatrogenic risks. In reality, invasive medical procedures for children and adults differ in nature and occur in separate clinical settings, allowing adult-to-adult transmission among patients and child-to-child transmission in paediatric wards, but not adult-to-child or child-to-adult HIV transmission. Adults share some blood exposures with children as they also receive injections, but adults have additional exposures (e.g. dental care, shaving and the invasive care involved in assisted delivery). 63,64
Adults in Africa receive an estimated 2.1 injections per year. 65 The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated injection risks to children as being identical to adults, except for the addition of immunization injections. 66 Excluding immunizations, most of which are now performed with auto-disable (non-reusable) syringes in Africa, children in Uganda receive fewer injections with age: children under two years old receive 3.1 therapeutic injections per year, while children 9–12 years old receive 0.6. 67 In Rwanda, well children receive on average 4.0 injections per year. 68
The risk from an individual injection, however, depends on the background clinical prevalence of HIV among patients. In paediatric settings fewer patients are HIV positive, meaning that an injection with a needle used on another patient in the paediatric ward is less likely to have been contaminated with HIV. No more than one in five HIV-positive mothers in Africa will have an HIV-positive child who survives to age two without antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. Adjusting for a higher HIV prevalence among patients, the adult annual HIV incidence from unsafe medical injections alone should be greater than the non-vertical incidence in children.
DISCUSSION
This review demonstrates that the available data on HIV prevalence in children in Africa support an important role for iatrogenic transmission in Africa's generalized HIV epidemics. In 21 of 28 studies with information on prevalence in children and relevant adults, the HIV prevalence in children is too high to be explained by vertical transmission, and this difference is statistically significant. In studies matching HIV-positive children to HIV-negative mothers, a median 17.5% of HIV infections in children are non-vertical.
Importantly, attributing over half of prevalent HIV infections in children to non-vertical transmission does not mean that 50% or more of incident HIV infections result from unsafe health care. Non-vertically infected children survive several times longer to be counted, and some will have been infected by other means, including traditional scarification, circumcision, sexual abuse and early sexual debut. That such a large number of children would be subject to these other risk factors, more so than to unsafe injections, seems unlikely, however.
The data presented in Tables 1 and 2 underestimate the proportion of HIV infections in children from non-vertical transmission. The expected HIV prevalence from mother-to-child transmission reported in Table 1 and estimated using assumptions detailed in the Appendix is likely to be an overestimate because: (1) children in longitudinal survival studies probably lived longer than other HIV-positive African children would, receiving free health care over the course of these studies; (2) the HIV prevalence in adults in increasing epidemics will have been lower at the time when the sampled children were born; and (3) in recent studies the mother-to-child transmission rate is an overestimate, as treatment for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission has increasingly been made available. As a result, the excess prevalence from non-vertical HIV transmission to children has likely been underestimated.
In one respect the opposite bias may apply. In 11 studies including children of a wide range of ages (e.g. 2–14 years) no data on the age distribution of children in the sample are reported, and the sampling method is not described. A left-skewed age distribution could exaggerate the difference between observed and expected prevalence in such studies. Hospital samples (largely avoided through the exclusion criteria) would probably over-represent younger children, whereas random household sampling (described in several studies) would not.
The percentage of HIV-positive children with HIV-negative mothers in Table 2 may also underestimate the percentage of HIV-positive children with non-vertical infections. Some mothers acquire HIV from breastfeeding children, following a hospital-acquired infection in the child. This has been documented in scores of cases from large iatrogenic HIV outbreaks among Libyan, Romanian and Russian children. 69–71 In high incidence settings in Africa, other mothers of children with hospital-acquired HIV infections will already have unmatched HIV infections.
Modelling the age distribution of HIV in children assuming a bimodal epidemic shows that a high rate of iatrogenic transmission (with non-vertical incidence as great as 5% of mother-to-child incidence) is consistent with observed HIV prevalence in children. Notably, even with this high rate of iatrogenic transmission, the high HIV prevalence in mothers (in this model 20%) is consistent with low HIV prevalence in children (3.5% in children more than five years old). This model is most apt in South Africa in 2005, where immunization injections are still given with disposable syringes. The risk to transmit HIV through injections has been reduced throughout Africa by the shift to using auto-disable syringes for immunization injections. This was a shift led by UNICEF, WHO, other donors and national governments beginning in 2001. Only Namibia and South Africa have not yet adopted the auto-disable (non-reusable) syringe for all immunizations.
Support for more efficacious infection control in other medical procedures remains poor in Africa, however, as evidenced in the limited sterilization equipment coverage for clinics and hospitals. 28 Unsafe health care has been proposed as a major HIV transmission route in Africa, encompassing very small blood exposures in unsafe medical injections, and cross-contamination in other invasive procedures such as assisted delivery and unsterile dental care. This hypothesis cannot be dismissed on the basis of systematically selected childhood HIV prevalence data.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges Devon Brewer's support in selecting and applying statistical methods appropriate to this analysis, though he is not responsible for errors of omission or commission.
