The main purpose of this paper is modeling and simulation of in-situ releasing of smart nano-sized core-shell particles at the water-oil interface during polymer flooding. During the polymer flooding process, when these nano-particles reach the water-oil interface, migrate to the oil phase and the hydrophobic layer of them dissolves in this phase. After dissolution of this protective nano-sized layer, the hydrophilic core containing a water-soluble ultra high molecular weight polymer diffuses back into the water phase and with dissolving in this phase, dramatically increases viscosity of flooding water in the neighborhood of the water-oil interface. In this study, two different time-dependent dissolution models are implemented. A swellable-chain disentanglement model with concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient is considered for dissolution of the core polymer into the aqueous phase, whereas, surface chain disentanglement with constant diffusion coefficient is considered for dissolution of the shell polymer in the oil phase. Using finite difference scheme, the governing equations are numerically solved by defining some dimensionless parameters for the main parameters as well as the moving boundaries. In addition, some experimental flooding tests in micromodel were carried out to experimentally investigate the recovery factor of using these particles compared to those of the conventional polymer flooding.
BaiY.LiJ.ZhouJ. and LiQ., 2008. Sensitivity analysis of the dimensionless parameters in scaling a polymer flooding reservoir. Transport in Porous Media73(1), 21–37.
2.
BarbaA.A.d'AmoreM.ChiricoS.LambertiG. and TitomanlioG., 2009. Swelling of cellulose derivative (HPMC) matrix systems for drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers78(3), 469–474.
3.
BarteldsG.A.BruiningJ. and MolenaarJ., 1997. The modeling of velocity enhancement in polymer flooding. Transport in Porous Media26(1), 75–88.
4.
CainS.R.WilcoxJ.R. and VenkatramanR., 1997. Diffusional model for transient liquid phase bonding. Acta Materialia45(2), 701–707.
5.
ChapraS.C. and CanaleR.P., 2002. Numerical methods for engineers: with software and programming applications, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 926.
6.
ChatzisI.MorrowN.R. and LimH.L., 1983. Magnitude and detailed structure of residual oil saturation. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal23(2), 311–326.
7.
ChiricoS.DalmoroA.LambertiG.RussoG. and TitomanlioG., 2007. Analysis and modeling of swelling and erosion behavior for pure HPMC tablet. Journal of Controlled Release122(2), 181–188.
8.
CouvreurP. and DubernetC., 1995. Controlled drug delivery with nanoparticles current possibilities and future trends. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics41, 2–13.
9.
CrankJ., 1987. Free and moving boundary problems, 1st edition, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 425.
10.
CyrT.J.CruzV. and SpanosT.J.T., 1988. An analysis of the viability of polymer flooding as an enhanced oil recovery technology. Transport in Porous Media3(6), 591–618.
11.
De GennesP.G., 1979. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics, 1st Edition, Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 320.
12.
DetlingK.D., 1944. Process of recovering oil from oil sand. U.S. Patent No. 2341500.
13.
EmamiH.KharratR. and WangX., 2011. Study of microscopic and macroscopic displacement behaviors of polymer solution in water-wet and oil-wet media. Transport in Porous Media89(1), 97–120.
14.
FerryJ.D., 1980. Viscoelastic properties of polymers, 3rd Edition. John Wiley, New York, pp. 672.
15.
FloryP.J. and RehnerJ., 1943. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. swelling. Journal of Chemical Physics11(11), 521–527.
16.
FrenningG. and StrømmeM., 2003. Drug release modeled by dissolution, diffusion, and immobilization International. International Journal of Pharmaceutics250(1), 137–145.
17.
FujitaH., 1961. Diffusion in polymer-diluent systems. Advances in Polymer Science3, 1–47.
18.
HaugseV.KarlsenK.H.LieK.A. and NatvigJ.R., 2001. Numerical solution of the polymer system by front tracking. Transport in Porous Media44(1), 63–83.
19.
HodaieH. and BagciA.S., 1993. Polymer-Augmented Water flooding in a Reservoir with a Bottom-water Zone. In: Middle East Oil Show 25633-MS, Bahrain, Society of Petroleum Engineers(SPE).
20.
KiilS. and Dam-JohansenK., 2003. Controlled drug delivery from swellable hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices: Model-based analysis of observed radial front movements. Journal of Controlled Release90(1), 1–21.
21.
LandauH.G., 1950. Heat conduction in a melting solid. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics8(1), 81–94.
22.
LeeK.S., 2009. Simulation of polymer flood processes in heterogeneous layered systems with crossflow and adsorption. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute52(4), 190–197.
23.
LinC.C. and MettersA.T., 2006. Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: Network design and mathematical modeling. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews58(12), 1379–1408.
24.
LinJ.S. and PengY.L., 2005. Swelling controlled release of drug in spherical polymer-penetrant systems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer48(6), 1186–1194.
25.
LuH., 2004. Improving oil recovery with polymer flooding in a heavy-oil river-channel sandstone reservoir, Phd Thesis, Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Germany.
26.
LuS.M. and ChenS.R., 1993. Mathematical analysis of drug release from a coated particle. Journal of Controlled Release23(2), 105–121.
27.
MaerkerJ.M., 1975. Shear degradation of partially hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal15(4), 311–322.
28.
NarasimhanB. and PeppasN.A., 1996. Disentanglement and reptation during dissolution of rubbery polymers. Journal of Polymer Science, part B: Polymer Physics34(5), 947–961.
29.
NarasimhanB. and PeppasN.A., 1996. On the Importance of Chain Reptation in Models of Dissolution of Glassy Polymers. Journal of Macromolecules29(9), 3283–3291.
30.
NarasimhanB., 2001. Mathematical models describing polymer dissolution: Consequences for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Review48(3), 195–210.
31.
PeppasN.A. and FransonN.M., 1983. The swelling interface number as a criterion for prediction of diffusional solute release mechanisms in swellable polymers. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics21(6), 983–997.
32.
PetittiM.VanniM. and BarresiA.A., 2008. Controlled release of drug encapsulated as a solid core: Theoretical model and sensitivity analysis. Chemical Engineering Research and Design86(11), 1294–1300.
33.
PyeD.J., 1964. Improved secondary oil recovery by control of water mobility. Journal of Petroleum Technology16(8), 911–916.
34.
RamazaniA. and TamsilianY., 2010. Manufacturing of nano-scale coated Polyacrylamide particles in order to control and improve of the solubility during polymer flooding process. Iran Patent 68076.
35.
RamazaniA.NouraniM. and EmadiM.A., 2010. Investigation of rheological behaviour and hydrodynamic diameter of high molecular weight, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide in high salinity and temperature conditions. Iranian Polymer Journal19(2), 105–113.
36.
ReisC.P., 2006. Nanoencapsulation I. Methods for preparation of drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. Journal of Nanomedicine2(1), 8–21.
37.
SandifordB.B., 1964. Laboratory and field studies of water floods using polymer solutions to increase oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Technology16(8), 917–92.
38.
ShedidA., 2006. Influences of fracture orientation on oil recovery by water and polymer flooding process: An experimental approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering50(3–4), 285–292.
39.
SiepmannJ. and PeppasN.A., 2000. Hydrophilic Matrices for Controlled Drug Delivery: An Improved Mathematical Model to Predict the Resulting Drug Release Kinetics (the “Sequential Layer” Model). Pharmaceutical Research17(10), 1290–1298.
40.
SiepmannJ. and SiepmannF., 2008. Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics364(2), 328–343.
41.
SiepmannJ.KranzH.BodmeierR. and PeppasN.A., 1999. HPMC-matrices for controlled Drug Delivery: A new model combining diffusion, swelling, and dissolution mechanisms and predicting the release kinetics. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research16(11), 1748–1756.
42.
WangD.SerightR.S.ShaoZ. and WangJ., 2008. Key aspects of project design for polymer flooding. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering11(6), 1117–1124.
43.
WangW.LiuY. and GuY., 2003. Application of a Novel Polymer System in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). Colloid & Polymer Science281(11), 1046–1054.
44.
WasseniusH.NydénM. and VincentB., 2003. NMR diffusion studies of translational properties of oil inside core–shell latex particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science264(2), 538–547.
45.
WilliamsJ.B. and KutachaiH., 1986. Use of membrane-bound fluorophore to characterize diffusion boundary layers around human erythrocytes. Biophysical Journal49(2), 453–458.
46.
WuN.WangL.TanD.C.W.MoochhalaS.M. and YangY., 2005. Mathematical modeling and in vitro study of controlled drug release via a highly swellable and dissoluble polymer matrix: Polyethylene oxide with high molecular weights. Journal of Controlled Release102(3), 569–581.
47.
ZhangY.HuangS. and LuoP., 2010. Coupling immiscible CO2 technology and polymer injection to maximize EOR performance for heavy oils. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology49(5), 25–33.
