Characteristics of Carbon Transactions. Joint Implementation,Clean Development Mechanisms and Emission Trading in Perspective

Abstract

Throughout the past years, the first carbon credits – though not yet certified by the UNFCCC – have been traded. The technologies used, project size and regional preferences of carbon transactions via Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism approved under major programmes are reviewed in this paper. The current full JI and CDM project portfolio aims to reduce some 100 MtCO₂-eq. This market is highly monopsonic; the buyers determine which credits are sold. The 12 JI projects are mainly implemented in Romania and Poland and constitute a diverse technology portfolio. Most of the 37 CDM projects are implemented in Latin America. Hydro and wind energy projects dominate in terms of numbers of projects. One large-scale fuel switch and one afforestation project bias the portfolio in terms of absolute CO₂ reduction. Comments are made on the baseline consistency and additionality of the currently selected projects. The assessment of emissions trading programmes is more difficult than that of separate projects, because of the characteristics of an emissions trading market. Yet, depending on the starting conditions, the ET programmes vary in their success.

References

CERUPT 2001, Terms of Reference CERUPT 2001. By Egbert Liese , Senter International, November 2001.

de Coninck

H.C.

van der Linden

, (ECN Petten (Netherlands)): An overview of carbon transaction: General characteristics and specific peculiarities. ECN-C—03-022, Petten March 2003.

Croci

, Voluntary agreements for CO2 emissions reduction: Evaluation and perspectives, this issue, 2003.

Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), The UK Emissions Trading Scheme, Auction analysis and Progress Report, October 2002.

ERUPT 3, Terms of Reference Carboncredits.nl, ERUPT 3. By Senter International, October 2002.

European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for green house gas emissions trading within the European Community and amending Council directive 96/61/EC. 2001.

IPCC 2001 a: Synthesis Report, Climate Change 2001: Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Dokken

D.J.

, Cambridge Press, 2001.

IPCC, 2001b: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Houghton

J.T.

, Cambridge Press, 2001.

Jansen

J.C.

Linden

N.H.

Martens

J.W.

Ormel

Rooijen

S.N.M.

(ECN, Petten (Netherlands)); Heaps

Kartha

Lazarus

Ruth

(SEI Boston (USA)); Lee

Mendis

(AED, (USA)): Potential and cost of Clean Development Mechanism options in the energy sector. ECN-C—99-095, December 1999.

10.

Kartha

Lazarus

(SEI), Bosi

(IEA): Practical baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector. OECD and IEA information paper, May 2002.

11.

Klerk

, (Senter), “The Dutch ERUPT programme, materializing the Russian potential” Presentation Moscow, April 2003.

12.

Linden

N.H.

van der Sijm

J.P.M.

(ECN, Petten (Netherlands)); Dankers

A.P.H.

(ADventures in Sustanable NRG, Petten (Netherlands)) (2002): De evenwichtsprijs voor emissiereductieeenheden: Een actualisatie naar aanleiding van recente ontwikkelingen. ECN-C—01-127, Petten February 2002.

13.

Linden

N.H.

Ybema

J.R.

Beeldman

van Rooijen

S.N.M.

(ECN, Petten (Netherlands)): Een samenvattende analyse van potentiëlen en kosten van broeikasgasreductie-opties in binnenen buitenland. ECN-C—00-015, Petten January 2000.

14.

Martens

J.W.

(ECN), Kaufman

S.L.

(STC), Green

(IT Power), Nieuwenhout

F.D.J.

(ECN),: Streamlining CDM procedures for solar home systems. ECN-C—01-098, Petten December 2001a.

15.

Martens

J.W.

van Rooijen

S.N.M.

(ECN), Bovée

(Ecosecurities), Wijnants

H.J.

(DHV), 2001b: Standardised baselines for small-scale CDM activities. ECN-C—01-122, Petten December 2001b.

16.

Pearson

, The Cerupt portfolio, A step backwards for climate protection, published by CDM Watch, 2003.

17.

Prototype Carbon Fund, A public-private partnership, Annual report 2002, 2002.

18.

Schleich

Ehrhart

K.M.

Hoppe

Seifert

, Are companies ready for emission trading? Implications of a simulation game in Germany, this issue, 2003.

19.

Senter, 2003b, press release: CERUPT announcement. March 13, 2003.

20.

Senter, 2003a, press release: Expressions of Interest ERUPT 3. February 13, 2003.

21.

SGS, CERUPT Validation of the Bayano Hydroelectric Project, Panama, Unqualified validation report, 2002.

22.

Sorrell

(SPRU), Who owns the carbon?, this issue, 2003.

23.

Stavins, Robert (1998). ‘What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 12, No. 3. 69–88.

24.

UNFCCC, Greenhouse gas inventory database, available on www.unfccc.int, 2002.

25.

UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties. Volume II, Decision 17/CP7, 2001.UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997.

26.

VROM: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of the Netherlands, Operational Guidelines for Baseline Studies, Validation, Monitoring and Verification of Clean Development Mechanism Project Activities. Volume 1: Introduction, October 2001a.

27.

28.

VROM: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment of the Netherlands, Standardised Baselines and Streamlined Monitoring Procedures for Selected Small-scale Clean Development Mechanism Project Activities. Volume 2c: Baseline Studies for small-scale project categories, December 2001c.

29.

Ybema

J.R.

Volkers

, Baseline Greenhouse Gas emission factors for grid-connected electricity generation of countries in Central and Eastern Europe (Contribution to the Version 2.0 operational guidelines for setting up baseline studies under the second tender of the Dutch ERUPT programme, October 2001.

30.

Zhang, ZhongZiang, Estimating the Size of the potential market for all three flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, University of Groningen, November 1999.