Factors Affecting Ventilation and Acoustical Quality in a Sustainably-Designed and in Conventional Buildings

Abstract

This paper discusses a pilot study involving direct monitoring of airflow and acoustical quality in a sustainably-designed and in conventional buildings. The objectives were to measure these environmental aspects, determine the factors affecting them and the relationships between them and key building-design concepts, and consider the implications of the results for ventilation-system design. Selected rooms in buildings with natural and mechanical ventilation, without and with acoustical treatment, were monitored. Measurements were made of airflow rates and acoustical quality. Correlations between these environmental aspects, the types of building and ventilation system, and the building window status were investigated. In rooms with natural ventilation, noise levels were lower; however, the rooms had lower airflow rates. Rooms with mechanical ventilation had higher airflow rates, but noise levels were higher; HVAC noise was a problem if the system was not well designed. In naturally-ventilated buildings, airflow rates and noise levels were low with windows closed, but opening the windows to increase the airflow rate resulted in higher noise levels. The results of the study suggest that the acceptability of indoor environments in buildings depends on the degree of compliance of the design and its implementation with standards and design guidelines, whether the original design is ‘sustainable’ or not.

References

Khaleghi

, Relationship between Ventilation, Air Quality and Acoustics in ‘Green’ and ‘Brown’ Buildings, M. Eng. Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2008.

Khaleghi

Bartlett

, and Hodgson

, Relationship between ventilation, indoor-air quality and acoustical quality in ‘green’ and non-‘green’ buildings, Journal of Green Building Research, 2011, 6(4), 168–180.

Hodgson

, Relationship between HVAC noise levels and air-flow rates, and noise control, in a mechanically-ventilated university building, ASHRAE Transactions, 2010, 116(1), 550–555.

Baird

, Sustainable Buildings in Practice: What the Users Think., Routledge, New York, 2010.

Hodgson

, Acoustical evaluation of six ‘green’ office buildings, Journal of Green Building Research, 2008, 3(4), 108–118.

A Manual of Recommended Practice in Industrial Ventilation, 21st edn., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 1992, 9.1 to 9.28.

Bearg

, Indoor Air Quality and HVAC Systems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1993, 114–119.

Acoustics and Vibration in Buildings in Design Standards Brief, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 2003, section 11. Accessed October 2012 at: http://psportal.gm.rmit.edu.au/files/DesignBrief/Section%2011%20%20Acoustics.pdf.

Glass

G.V.

, and Hopkins

K.D.

, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (3rd ed.), Allyn & Bacon Publishers, Boston, MA, 1995.

10.

Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, ASHRAE Standard 62.1, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2004.

11.

Personal communication. M. Lis, Manager Technical Services, University of British Columbia, 2002.

12.

Larsen

T.S.

, and Heiselberg

, Single-sided natural ventilation driven by wind pressure and temperature difference, Energy and Buildings, 2008, 40(6), 1031–1040.

13.

Bibby

, and Hodgson

, Prediction study of factors affecting speech privacy between rooms and the effect of ventilation openings, Applied Acoustics (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.10.005 in press.

14.

Sound and Vibration Control in Fundamentals Handbook, Ch. 7, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2005.

Factors Affecting Ventilation and Acoustical Quality in a Sustainably-Designed and in Conventional Buildings — A Pilot Study

Abstract

References