This paper investigates the robust performance of fuzzy supervisory control (FSC) technique for seismically excited cable-stayed bridge. The FSC technique utilizes fuzzy logic-based decision-making process to incorporate a set of pre-designed static control gains into a time-varying optimal control gain. To demonstrate the excellent robustness of the FSC technique on response control of earthquake-excited cable-stayed bridge, a conventional linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller with single static gain and two fuzzy supervisory controllers are designed for the benchmark cable-stayed bridge, and their robust performances are examined under uncertainty in bridge model and against failures in actuators and sensors. Under the presence of uncertainty in the bridge model, the FSC system successfully reduces the seismic responses of the bridge without significant increase in the total amount of power and stroke required by the control system, while the LQG system exhibits a substantial increase in the seismic responses. Under conditions of sensor or actuator failures, the FSC system guarantees a more enhanced robust performance than the LQG system as well.
BattainiM. and DykeS.J. (1998). “Fault tolerant structural control systems for civil engineering applications”, Journal of Structural Control, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5–29.
2.
BurlJ.B. (1999). Linear Optimal Control –H2and HMethods, Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
3.
ChangS.P. (2001). Cable-Supported Bridges-Challenging Technical Limits, IABSE Conference, Seoul, Korea.
4.
DykeS.J.CaicedoJ.M.TuranG.BergmanL.A. and HagueS. (2003). “Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 857–872.
5.
FujinoY.SoongT.T. and SpencerB.F.Jr (1996). “Structural control–basic concepts and applications”. Proceedings of the ASCE Structures Congress XIV, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 1277–1287.
6.
FujinoY. (2002). “Vibration, control and monitoring of long-span bridges–recent research, developments and practice in Japan”, Journal of Construction Steel Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 71–97.
7.
FujitaT.KamadaT. and MasakiN. (1992). “Fundamental study of active mass damper using multistage rubber bearing and hydraulic actuator for vibration control of tall buildings: Part I study on control law for the active mass damper”, Trans JSME, Vol. 58, pp. 87–91.
GoldbergD.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
10.
HousnerG.W.BergmanL.A.CaugheyT.K.ChassiakosA.G.ClausR.O.MasriS.F.SkeltonR.E.SoongT.T.SpencerB.F.Jr and YaoJ.T.P. (1997). “Structural control: Past, present, and future”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 9, pp. 897–971.
11.
ItoM.FujinoY.NaritaN. and MiyataT. (1991). Cable-Stayed Bridges–Their Recent Developments and Their Future, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherland.
12.
LarsenA. (1992). Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, Rotterdam, Netherland.
13.
LarsenA. and EsdahlS. (1998). Bridge Aerodynamics, Rotterdam, Netherland.
14.
NagashimaI. and ShinozakiY. (1997). “Variable gain feedback control technique of active mass damper and its application to hybrid structural control”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 815–838.
15.
OkS.Y.ParkK.S. and KohH.M. (2005). “Evaluation of robust performance of fuzzy supervisory control technique”, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 41–51. (in Korean)
16.
ParkK.S.KohH.M. and OkS.Y. (2002). “Active control of earthquake excited structures using fuzzy supervisory technique”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 33, No. 11–12, pp. 761–768.
17.
ParkK.S.KohH.M.OkS.Y. and SeoC.W. (2005). “Fuzzy supervisory control of earthquake-excited cable-stayed bridges”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 1086–1100.
18.
ParlosA.G.AbrahamM.A. and MorganJ.R. (2001). “Gain-scheduled adaptive control for seismically excited hybrid structures”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 11, pp. 1286–1294.
19.
PassinoK.M. and YurkovichS. (1998). Fuzzy Control, Addison-Wesley/Longman, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
20.
SchemmannA.G. and SmithH.A. (1998a). “Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges–part 1: Modeling issues”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 811–824.
21.
SchemmannA.G. and SmithH.A. (1998b). “Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges–part 2: Control analyses”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 825–843.
22.
SpencerB.F.Jr and NagarajaiahS. (2003). “State of the art of structural control”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 845–856.
23.
SymansM.D. and ConstantinouM.C. (1999). “Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: A state-of-the-art review”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 469–487.
24.
TanidaK. (2002). “Progress in the application of active vibration control technologies to long-span bridges in Japan”, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 363–371.
25.
YangJ.N. and AkbarpourA. (1990). “Effect of system uncertainty on control of seismic-excited buildings”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 462–478.
26.
YangJ.N.LinS. and JabbariF. (2003). “H2-based control strategies for civil engineering structures”, Journal of Structural Control, Vol. 10, No. 3–4, pp. 205–230.
27.
YoshidaK.NishimuraY. and YonezawaY. (1986). “Variable gain feedback controller for linear sampled-data systems with bounded control”, Control Theory and Advanced Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 313–323.
