Experimental Study on the Effects of Stacking Sequence on Low Velocity Impact and Quasi-Static Response of Foam Sandwich Composite Structures

Abstract

In this study, investigation has been made on the impact response of twill weave carbon fabric/epoxy foam sandwich composites by subjecting two types of stacking sequences of a sandwich composite structure, SC1 and SC2 to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact loading. SC1 and SC2 had a sequence of [0/90, ±45, Core, 0/90, ±45], [0/90, ±45, 0/90, ±45, 0/90, Core, 0/90, 0/90, 0/90, 0/90], respectively. This work was done by use of material testing system and an instrumented Drop-Weight Machine (CEAST 9350 drop tower). Foam sandwich composite structures are mainly used in making an Engine Hood. The analysis was done with increase of impact energy on both types of stacking sequences, until complete perforation of the specimens at 25 Joule impact energy occurs. The failure processes of the damaged specimens under the three different impact energies (5 J, 15 J, and 25 J) were evaluated by comparing load–displacement curves. Images of damaged samples were taken from both impacted side and non-impacted side and compared for all impact energies. Cross-sections of damaged specimens were also inspected visually and discussed. The load-displacement curves were obtained to characterize the failure mechanisms in the face sheets and core. Failure modes were also studied by sectioning the samples at the impact location and observed under an optical microscope. The primary damage mode was found due to the fiber fracture, delamination, matrix crack, and foam crack.

Keywords

stacking sequences low velocity impact quasi-static fiber failure perforation

References

Abrate

(1991). “Impact on laminated composite materials”, Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 155–190.

Abrate

(1997). “Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings”, Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 69–82.

Abrate

(2005). Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, UK.

Aktaş

Atas

Içten

B.M.

Karakuzu

(2009). “An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates”, Composite Structures, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 307–313.

Aktay

Johnson

A.F.

Holzapfel

(2005). “Prediction of impact damage on sandwich composite panels”, Computational Materials Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 252–260.

Anderson

T.A.

(2005). “An investigation of SDOF models for large mass impact on sandwich composites”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 135–142.

Andrews

E.W.

Moussa

N.A.

(2009). “Failure mode maps for composite sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 418–425.

Bibo

G.A.

Hogg

P.J.

(1996). “The role of reinforcement architecture on impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behaviour”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 1115–1137.

Bull

D.J.

Scott

A.E.

Spearing

S.M.

Sinclair

(2014). “The influence of toughening-particles in CFRPs on low velocity impact damage resistance performance”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 58, pp. 47–55.

10.

Cantwell

W.J.

Morton

(1991). “The impact resistance of composite materials—a review”, Composites, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 347–362.

11.

Dariushi

Sadighi

(2014). “A new nonlinear high order theory for sandwich beams: An analytical and experimental investigation”, Composite Structures, Vol. 108, pp. 779–788.

12.

Diamanti

Soutis

Hodgkinson

J.M.

(2005). “Nondestructive inspection of sandwich and repaired composite laminated structures”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 13, pp. 2059–2067.

13.

Fan

X.L.

Wang

T.J.

Sun

(2011). “Damage evolution of sandwich composite structure using a progressive failure analysis methodology”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 10, pp. 530–535.

14.

Feraboli

Kedward

K.T.

(2006). “A new composite structure impact performance assessment program”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 10, pp. 1336–1347.

15.

Feraboli

(2006). “Damage resistance characteristics of thick-core honeycomb composite panels”, Fourty Seventh AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, No. 2006–2169.

16.

Fotsing

E.R.

Ross

Ruiz

(2014). “Characterization of surface defects on composite sandwich materials based on deflectrometry”, NDT & E International, Vol. 62, pp. 29–39.

17.

Godin

Huguet

Gaertner

Salmon

(2004). “Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers”, NDT & E International, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 253–264.

18.

Hogg

P.J.

Bibo

G.A.

(2000). Impact and Damage Tolerance, Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites, CRC, Boca Raton, USA.

19.

Huang

Y.D.

Froyen

Wevers

(2001). “Quality control and nondestructive tests in metal matrix composites”, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 113–132.

20.

Ivañez

Barbero

Sanchez-Saez

(2014). “Analytical study of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams”, Composite Structures, Vol. 111, pp. 459–467.

21.

Kenny

J.M.

Torre

(1998). “Impact testing and simulation of sandwich structures”, Proceedings of AIAS, Perugia, Italy.

22.

Kim

J.K.

Sham

M.L.

(2000). “Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 745–761.

23.

Lee

L.J.

Huang

K.Y.

Fann

Y.J.

(1993). “Dynamic responses of composite sandwich plate impacted by a rigid ball”, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 27, No. 13, pp. 1238–1256.

24.

Lim

T.S.

Lee

C.S.

(2004). “Failure modes of foam core sandwich beams under static and impact loads”, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 38, No. 18, pp. 1639–1662.

25.

Luo

R.K.

Green

E.R.

Morrison

C.J.

(2001). “An approach to evaluate the impact damage initiation and propagation in composite plates”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 513–520.

26.

Mohmmed

Zhang

Sun

(2014). “Static and low-velocity impact on mechanical behaviors of foam sandwiched composites with different ply angles face sheets”, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 48, pp. 1173–1188.

27.

Pan

Tian

Chen

Luo

(2012). “Defect characterisation using pulsed eddy current thermography under transmission mode and NDT applications”, NDT & E International, Vol. 52, pp. 28–36.

28.

Peters

Kommareddy

Liu

Fei

Hsu

(2003). “Non-contact inspection of composites using air-coupled ultrasound”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 657, No. 22, pp. 973–980.

29.

Raišutis

Kažys

Žukauskas

Mažeika

Vladišauskas

(2010). “Application of ultrasonic guided waves for non-destructive testing of defective CFRP rods with multiple delaminations”, NDT & E International, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 416–424.

30.

Raj

S.V.

Ghosn

L.J.

(2008). “Failure maps for rectangular 17–4PH stainless steel sandwiched foam panels”, Materials Science and Engineering, Vol.474, No. 1, pp. 88–95.

31.

Richardson

M.O.W.

Wisheart

M.J.

(1996). “Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 27, No. 12, pp. 1123–1131.

32.

D7136/D7136M (2007). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event, West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International, pp. 1–16.

33.

Torre

Kenny

J.M.

Mamalis

A.G.

(1999). “Energy adsorbing behavior of composite sandwich panels for civil transportation”, In Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, International SAMPE Europe Conference, pp. 457–468.

34.

Zenkert

Burman

(2011). “Failure mode shifts during constant amplitude fatigue loading of GFRP/foam core sandwich beams”, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 217–222.

35.

Zhu

Chai

G.B.

(2013). “Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact”, Composite Structures, Vol. 101, pp. 204–214.