In this paper, the behavior and performance of a new type of bracing system called Hat Knee Bracing (HKB) is investigated in low-rise multistory steel structures. This novel form of resistant system, which provides reasonable stiffness in moderate earthquakes, consists of a V shaped knee member connected to mid span of the beam and the brace members. In this research work, the “FEMA P695 evaluation method” is utilized in order to explore the nonlinear behavior of the HKB frame, and quantification of three seismic performance factors: Response Modification Factor, Over-strength Factor, and Deflection Amplification Factor. The seismic response simulation of archetype frames is performed using the OpenSees software. The results of analyses reveal that the performance of the HKB is suitable under a rare earthquake and under moderate intense earthquakes the damages are mostly concentrated in knee members instead of the principal members such as beams and columns.
AISC 360–05 (2005). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
2.
Aristizabal-OchoaJ.D. (1986). “Disposable knee bracing: Improvement in seismic design of steel frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 7, pp. 1544–1552.
3.
ASCE/SEI 7–05 (2005). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
4.
ATC-40 (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied technology council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
5.
BakerJ.W. and CornellC. (2006). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1077–1095.
6.
BalendraT.SamM. and LiawC. (1990). “Diagonal brace with ductile knee anchor for aseismic steel frame”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 847–858.
7.
BalendraT.SamM. and LiawC. (1991). “Design of earthquake-resistant steel frames with knee bracing”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 193–208.
8.
FarahiM. and MofidM. (2013). “On the quantification of seismic performance factors of Chevron Knee Bracings, in steel structures”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 46, pp. 155–164.
9.
FEMA P695 (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
10.
FEMA-273 (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
11.
IbarraL.F. and KrawinklerH. (2005). Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic Excitations, Tech. reprt No. 152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.
12.
JafarramajiI. and MofidM. (2012). “On the characteristics and seismic study of Hat Knee Bracing system in steel structures”, Steel & Composite Structures, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
13.
KrawinklerH. and LignosD. (2009). Seismic Risk Assement and Retrofitting Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engimeering, Springer, New York, New York, USA.
14.
LignosD. (2008). Sidesway Collapse of Deteriorating Structural Systems under Seismic Excitations, PhD Thesis, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.
15.
LignosD. and KrawinklerH. (2010). “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 137, No. 11, pp. 1291–1302.
16.
OpenSees (2006). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
17.
RahnamaM. and KrawinklerH. (1993). Effects of Soft Soil and Hysteresis Model on Seismic Demands, Tech. reprt No. 108, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.
18.
RoederC.W. and PopovE.P. (1978). “Eccentrically braced steel frames for earthquakes”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 391–412.
19.
TajammolianH. and MofidM. (2013). “On the characteristics and design of yielding elements used in steel-braced framed structures”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 179–191.
20.
UrizP. and MahinA. (2008). Toward Earthquake-Resistant Design of Concentrically Braced Steel-Frame Structures, PEER repotr 2008/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
21.
VamvatsikosD. and CornellC. (2004). “Applied incremental dynamic analysis”, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 523–553.
22.
VamvatsikosD. and CornellC. (2005). Seismic Performance Capacity and Reliability of Structures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Tech. reprt No. 151, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.
