Effect of Directly Welded Stringer-To-Beam Connections on the Analysis and Design of Modular Steel Building Floors

Abstract

Modular Steel Buildings (MSBs) are fast evolving as an effective alternative to conventional on-site steel construction. An explanation of the concept of modular steel design, including its unique detailing requirements is given in this paper. The paper also focuses on a typical MSB floor system which is achieved by welding the webs of the stringers directly to the floor beams. A typical modular floor grid structure is designed using conventional methods. The floor is then modelled using the finite element method and analyzed under the effect of dead and live service loads. This allows an assessment of the effect of direct welding between stringers and floor beams on the analysis and design of floor beams, stringers, and welded connections. The results reveal that consideration of the true behaviour of direct welding leads to a distribution of forces and moments which is different from those found in conventional steel buildings. A simplified analytical model is proposed to capture such behaviour. Regression functions have been developed to describe the model. In practice, the proposed model can predict the actual forces and moments, leading to a reliable design of modular steel floors.

Keywords

modular steel buildings floor grid structure directly welded connection finite element analysis analytical model regression function

References

Al-Emrani

and Kliger

(2003). “FE analysis of stringer-to-floor-beam connections in riveted railway bridges”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp. 803–818.

Astaneh

Nader

M.N.

and Malik

(1989). “Cyclic behavior of double angle connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 5, pp. 1101–1118.

Chen

W.F.

and Toma

(1994). Advanced Analysis of Steel Frames: Theory, Software and Applications, New Directions in Civil Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

CSA (2001). Handbook of Steel Construction, 7th edn, Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada.

CSI. (2000). SAP2000 Nonlinear Computer Program, Computers and Structures, Inc, Berkeley, USA.

Doerk

Fricke

and Weissenborn

(2003). “Comparison of different methods for structural stresses at welded joints”, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 359–369.

Faella

Piluso

and Rizzano

(2000). Structural Steel Semi-Rigid Connections: Theory, Design and Software, New Directions in Civil Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

Goverdan

A.V.

(1983). A Collection of Experimental Moment-Rotation Curves and Evaluation of Prediction Equations for Semi-Rigid Connections, Vanderdilt University, Nashville, Tennesse.

Kishi

and Chen

W.F.

(1986). Steel Connection Data Bank Program, Structural Engineering Report, No. CE-STR-86-18, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

10.

Lawson

R.M.

Grubb

P.J.

Prewer

and Trebilcock

P.J.

(1999). Modular Construction using Light Steel Framing: An Architect's Guide, The Steel Construction Institute Publication SCI-P272, UK.

11.

Lipson

S.L.

(1968). “Single-angle and single-plate beam framing connections”, Proceedings of the Canadian Structural Engineering Conference, Toronto, Ontario, pp. 141–162.

12.

Marley

M.J.

and Gerstle

K.H.

(1982). “Analysis and tests of flexible-connected steel frames”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 107–118.

13.

Mazzolani

F.M.

and Piluso

(1992). “Evaluation of the rotation capacity of steel beams and beam-columns”, Proceedings of the 1st COST C1 Workshop, Strasbourg, 28–30 October.

14.

Engineering

Murray P.C.

(2000). “SUNY Purchase College Dormitory Construction Drawings”, (materials obtained by personal communication with Mr. Robert J. Murray, P.E., Principal, Murray Engineering, P.C.).

15.

NBCC (2005). National Building Code of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

16.

Thompson

L.E.

McKee

R.J.

and Visintainer

D.A.

(1970). An Iinvestigation of Rotation Characteristic of Web Shear Framed Connections using A-36 and A-441 Steel, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla, MO.

17.

Weaver

M.A.

(1999). “Determination of weld loads and throat requirements using finite element analysis with shell element models – A comparison with classical analysis”, Welding Research Supplement (April 1999).