Pilot Ability to Anticipate the Consequences of Flight Actions as a Function of Expertise

Abstract

The study offers insights into pilot ability to anticipate consequences of actions and how this ability changes with experience. Novice and expert pilots completed trials in which 3 screens depicted a control movement (or control movements), a cockpit flight situation, or a change in flight situation. Changes depicted in the 3rd screen of each trial were consistent, inconsistent with the mental model of the effect of the control movement or movements, or inconsistent with the application of the control movement(s) to the current flight situation. Pilots indicated whether the depicted change was inconsistent or consistent with their expectations, and accuracy of consistency judgments was greater for mental-model than for situation-model inconsistent statements. Experts are more accurate than novices, particularly for trials that involve multiple, meaningfully related control movements. Expert ability to organize information into meaningful units appears to facilitate future flight state projections, and projection failures appear to result from situation- rather than mental-model failures. Actual or potential applications of this research include analysis of flight situation awareness and flight performance errors.

References

Adams, M. J. , Tenney, Y. J. , & Pew, R. W. (1995). Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Human Factors, 37, 85–104.

Anderson, J. R. , & Jeffries, R. (1985). Novice LISP errors: Undetected losses of information from working memory. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 133–161.

Chase, W. G. , & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 1–58). New York: Academic.

Doane, S. M. , McNamara, D. S. , Kintsch, W. , Polson, P. G. , & Clawson, D. M. (1992). Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory and Cognition, 20, 327–343.

Doane, S. M. , Pellegrino, J. W. , & Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Expertise in a computer system: Conceptualization and performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 267–304.

Doane, S. M. , Sohn, Y. W. , McNamara, D. S. , & Adams, D. (2000). Comprehension-based skill acquisition. Cognitive Science, 24, 1–52.

Durso, F. T. , & Gronlund, S. D. (1999). Situation awareness. In F. T. Durso , R. S. Nickerson , R. W. Schvaneveldt , S. T. Dumais , D. S. Lindsay , & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 283–314). New York: Wiley.

Endsley, M. R. (1995a). A taxonomy of situation awareness errors. In R. Fuller , N. Johnson , & N. McDonald (Eds.), Human factors in aviation operations (pp. 287–292). Aldershot, England: Avebury Aviation, Ashgate Publishing.

Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.

10.

Endsley, M. R. , & Garland, D. J. (Eds.). (2000). Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Ericsson, K. A. , & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.

12.

Flach, J. M. (1995). Situation awareness: Proceed with caution. Human Factors, 37, 149–157.

13.

Flach, J. M. , & Rasmussen, J. (2000). Cognitive engineering: Designing for situation awareness. In N. D. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 153–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Green, D. L. , & Swets, J. A. , (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

15.

Horne, T. A. (1997). Measure of skill: Staying ahead of the airplane setting goals for each flight, a step at a time. AOPA Pilot, 40(6), 45–47.

16.

Jones, D. G. , & Endsley, M. R. (2000). Overcoming representational errors in complex environments. Human Factors, 42, 367–378.

17.

Mogford, R. H. (1997). Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 331–342.

18.

Moray, N. (1999). Mental models in theory and practice. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.) Attention and performance (pp. 223–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Sarter, N. B. , & Woods, D. D. (1991). Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 45–57.

20.

Sarter, N. B. , & Woods, D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5–19.

21.

Shebilske, W. L, Goettl, B. P. , & Garland, D. J. (2000). Situation awareness, automaticity, and training. In M. R. Endsley & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 303–323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

22.

Sohn, Y. W. , & Doane, S. M. (1997). Cognitive constraints on computer solving skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 288–312.

23.

Sohn, Y. W. , & Doane, S. M. (2003). Roles of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance. Memory and Cognition, 31, 458–466.

24.

vanDijk, T. A. , & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.

25.

Wickens, C. D. (1999). Cognitive factors in aviation. In F. T. Durso , R. S. Nickerson , R. W. Schvaneveldt , S. T. Dumais , D. S. Lindsay , & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 247–282). New York: Wiley.