Groups of listeners and rating scales were used to study the effects of extended speaking on resonance and voice quality in eight adults with cleft palate and mild to moderate hypernasality and a matched group of noncleft adults, with normal resonance and voice quality. Authors interpret their findings as indicating that resonance changes were greater and vocal quality changes less, for the cleft group, but that changes were not extensive nor always in the direction of increased hypernasality or decreased vocal quality.
BurzynskiC., TitzeI.Acoustic assessment of vocal endurance in untrained singers. In: LawrenceV., ed. Transcript of the Fourteenth Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice. Part 1: Scientific Papers.New York: The Voice Foundation,1985; 96–101.
2.
BzochK.Etiological factors related to cleft palate speech. In: Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate.3rd Ed.Boston: Little, Brown, 1989, 79–105.
3.
CounihanD.A clinical study of the speech efficiency and structural adequacy of operated adolescent and adult cleft palate persons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, 1956.
4.
CounihanD., CullinanW.Some relationships between vocal intensity and rated nasality.Cleft Palate J1972; 9: 101–108.
5.
GotaasC.A study of vocal fatigue in teachers, Unpublished masters thesis, University of Minnesota, 1986.
HolbrookA., MathiasW., BaileyC.Talking time and loud talking time as factors in vocal fatigue. Paper presented at the Convention of the Florida Speech and Hearing Association, 1974.
8.
HolbrookA.An instrumental approach to the assessment and remediation of speech disorders. In: PrinceL., ed, Biomedical psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins,1980; 82–87.
9.
McWilliamsB., BluestoneC.Diagnostic implications of vocal cord nodules in children with cleft palates.Laryngoscope1969; 79: 2072–2080.
10.
MollerK., StarrC.The effects of listening conditions on speech ratings obtained in a clinical setting.Cleft Palate J1984; 21: 65–69.
11.
MooreJ.The effects of noise and rate on the perception of nasality in cleft palate speech. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Minnesota, 1976.
12.
ReimersN., YairiE.Effects of speaking in noise on vocal fatigue and recovery.Asha1984; 26: 182.
13.
SchererR., TitzeI., RaphaelB., WoodR.Vocal fatigue: prolonged talking by trained voices.DCPA-RRC Research Report1986; 120–156.
14.
ShermanD., GoodwinF.Pitch level and nasality.J Speech Hear Res1954; 19: 423.
15.
ShermanD., JensenP.Harshness and oral-reading time.J Speech Hear Disord1962; 27: 172–177.
16.
SpriestersbachD.Assessing nasal quality in cleft palate speech of children.J Speech Hear Disord1955; 20: 266–270.
17.
StoneR.Sharf D. Vocal change associated with the use of atypical pitch and intensity levels.Folia Phoniatr1973; 25: 91–93.
18.
WeissA.Oral and nasal sound pressure levels as related to judged severity of nasality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1954.
19.
ZagoruikoN., TambovtsenY.Aspects of human performance in an intensive speech task.Int J Man-Machine Studies1982; 16: 173–181.
