Self-ratings of satisfaction with appearance and accomplishment of psychosocial tasks were examined by age and gender among school aged children with visible defects (cleft lip and/or palate, n = 272), or Invisible defects (cleft palate only, n = 159), and dental patients (n = 128) without clefts. Using weighted least squares ANOVA and logistic regressions, the results revealed that subjects with visible defects expressed greater dissatisfaction with their appearance than those subjects with invisible defects (p < .001). Subjects with Invisible defects consistently expressed lower problem solving ability than subjects with visible defects (p < .001) and dental patients with no defects (p < .05). Both groups with clefts expressed less social independence (p < .001); and subjects with clefts reported having more friends than other children (p < .01). Implications for clinicians and further research are discussed.
BroderH., RichmanL.An examination of mental health services for cleft/craniofacial patients.Cleft Palate j1987; 24: 158–162.
4.
BroderH.L., SmithF.B., StraussR.P.Habilitation of patients with clefts. Parent and child ratings of satisfaction with appearance and speech.Cleft Palate j1992; 29: 262–267.
5.
BroderH.L., StraussR.P.Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects.Cleft Palate J1989; 26: 114–117.
6.
Clarke-StewartA., FriedmanS.Child development: infancy through adolescence.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
7.
DionK.D., BerscheidE., WalsterE.What is beautiful is good.j Pers Soc Psychol1972; 24: 285–290.
8.
EricksonE.H.Childhood and society.New York: Norton, 1963.
9.
FisherS.Body consciousness: you are what you feel.Englewood Cliffs, nj: Prentice-Hall,1973.
10.
ForthoferR.N., LehnenR.G.Public program analysis: a new categorical data approach.Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1981.
11.
GoethalsG.R., WorshelS.Adjustment and human relations.New York: Alfred Knopf, 1981.
12.
GoffmanE.Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
13.
GrizzleJ.E., StarmerC.F., KochG.G.Analyses of categorical data by linear models.Biometrics1969; 25: 489–504.
14.
HarterS.Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In: LeahyR., ed. The development of the self.New York: Academic Press,1983a.
15.
HarterS.Developmental perspectives on self-system. In: HeatheringtonE.M., ed. Mussen PH, series ed. Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4.New York: John Wiley and Sons,1983b.
16.
JourardB.M.Personal adjustment: an approach through the study of healthy personality.2nd Ed.New York: MacMillan, 1963.
Kapp-SimonK.Parameters of practice for psychosocial care. Paper presented at the Standards for Care Conference of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1991.
19.
Kapp-SimonK., SimonD.J.Meeting the challenge: a social skills training program for adolescents with special needs.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
20.
KochG.G., ImreyP.B.Analysis of categorical data.Montreal, Quebec: Les Presses de L'Universite de Montreal, 1985; 262–279.
21.
LazarusR.S.Psychological stress and coping process.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
22.
MacgrecorF.C.Transformation and identity — the face and plastic surgery.New York: Quadrangle, New York Times, 1974.
23.
McCartheyL., HogeM.Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem.Dev Psych1982; 18: 372–379.
24.
McKinneyF., LorianR.P., ZaxM.Aspects of adjustment. In: Effective behavior and human development.New York: MacMillan, 1976.
25.
PhillipsD.The illusion of incompetence among academically competent children.Child Dev1984; 55: 2000–2016.
26.
RichmanL.C.The effects of facial disfigurement of ability in cleft palate children.Cleft Palate J1978; 15: 155–168.
27.
RichmanL.C., EliasonM.Psychological characteristics of children with cleft lip/palate: intellectual achievement, behavioral, and personality variables.Cleft Palate J1982; 19: 249–254.
28.
RichmanL.C., EliasonM., LindgrenS.D.Reading disability in children with cleft lip and/or palate.Cleft Palate J1988; 25: 21–27.
SchneidermanC.R., HardingJ.B.Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers.Cleft Palate J1984; 24: 219–222.
31.
ShapiroS.K., HoganA.E., VaugnS., QuayH.C.Factors related to discrepancies between children's self-reported peer acceptance and peer ratings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in San Francisco, CA, 1991.
32.
SigelmanC.K., MillerT.E., WhitworthL.A.The early stigmatizing reactions to physical differences.J Appl Dev Psychol1986; 7: 17–23.
33.
StraussR.P., BroderH.Speech and appearance concerns among adolescents with cleft lip and palate and their parents.Cleft Palate J1988; 25: 335–342.
34.
StraussR.P., BroderH.Psychological and socio-cultural aspects of cleft lip and palate. In: BardachJ., MorrisH.J. eds. Multidisciplinary treatment of cleft lip and palate.Philadelphia: WB Saunders,1990; 831–837.
35.
StraussR.P., BroderH.Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to craniofacial anomalies.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1991; 25: 1–7.
36.
SullivanH.S.Interpersonal theory of psychiatry.New York: Norton, 1953; 165.
37.
TobiasenJ.M., HiebertJ.M.Parent's tolerance for the conduct problems of the child with cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate J1984; 21: 82–86.
38.
Van DemarkD.R., HardenM.A.Speech therapy for the child with cleft lip and palate. In: BardachJ., MorrisH.L. eds. Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate.Philadelphia: WB Saunders,1990; 799–805.
