Facial Attractiveness and Facial Impairment Ratings in Children with Craniofacial Malformations

Abstract

Objective:

This study examined (1) the effects of type of malformation, sex of ratee, and sex of rater on facial attractiveness and facial impairment ratings, and (2) the reliability of judgments on facial attractiveness and facial impairment and the association between these two constructs.

Setting:

A university hospital for children.

Participants:

Raters were eight volunteers from the student population in a university, four men and four women.

Main Outcome Measures:

Raters judged frontal and lateral view slides of children with various types of craniofacial malformations both on a 5-point facial attractiveness scale and on a 5-point facial impairment scale.

Results:

Main effects were found for type of malformation, sex of ratee, and sex of rater. No interaction effects were found among type of malformation, sex of ratee, and sex of rater. Interrater reliability was moderate to high, both for attractiveness ratings and for impairment ratings. The correlation between facial attractiveness and facial impairment was also moderate to high.

Conclusions:

Both condition parameters (type of malformation) as well as social parameters (sex of rater and sex of ratee) seem to influence judgments on attractiveness and impairment. Facial attractiveness and facial impairment can be rated reliably in children with (cerebro)craniofacial dysplasias. Raters consider these concepts to be very similar but not identical.

Keywords

cerebrocraniofacial dysplasia children craniofacial dysplasia facial attractiveness facial impairment

References

Albino

J.E.

Alley

T.R.

Tedesco

L.A.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Kiyak

H.A.

Lawrence

S.D.

Esthetic issues in behavioral dentistry.

Ann Behav Med. 1990; 12: 148–155.

Albino

J.E.

Cunat

J.J.

Fox

R.N.

Lewis

E.A.

Slakter

M.J.

Tedesco

L.A.

Variables discriminating individuals who seek orthodontic treatment.

J Dent Res. 1981; 60: 1661–1667.

Alley

T.R.

Hildebrandt

K.A.

Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In: Alley

T.R.

, ed. Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988: 101–140.

Bull

Rumsey

The Social Psychology of Facial Appearance. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988.

Cunningham

M.R.

Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 50: 925–935.

Demellweek

Humphris

G.M.

Hare

Brown

Children's perception of, and attitude towards, unfamiliar peers with facial port-wine stains.

J Pediatr Psychol. 1997; 22: 471–485.

Eagly

A.H.

Ashmore

R.D.

Makhijani

M.G.

Longo

L.C.

What is beautiful is good, but …: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.

Psychol Bull. 1991; 110: 109–128.

Feingold

Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: a comparison across five research paradigms.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 59: 981–993.

Feingold

Good-looking people are not what we think.

Psychol Bull. 1992; 111: 304–341.

10.

Ferrario

V.F.

Sforza

Poggio

C.E.

Colombo

Tartaglia

The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children.

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997; 12: 145–152.

11.

Fridell

S.R.

Zucker

K.J.

Bradley

S.J.

Maing

D.M.

Physical attractiveness of girls with gender identity disorder.

Arch Sex Behav. 1996; 25: 17–31.

12.

Glass

Starr

C.D.

Stewart

R.E.

Hodge

S.E.

Identi-Kit model II- a potential tool for judging cosmetic appearance.

Cleft Palate J. 1981; 18: 147–151.

13.

Jackson

L.A.

Hunter

J.E.

Hodge

C.N.

Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: a meta-analytic review.

Soc Psychol Q. 1995; 58: 108–122.

14.

Jenny

Cons

N.C.

Kohout

F.J.

Frazier

R.J.

Test of a method to determine socially acceptable occlusal conditions.

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980; 9: 424–433.

15.

Langlois

J.H.

The origins and functions of appearance-based stereotypes: theoretical and applied implications. In: Eder

R.A.

, ed. Craniofacial Anomalies: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995: 22–47.

16.

Langlois

J.H.

Ritter

J.M.

Roggman

L.A.

Vaughn

L.S.

Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces.

Dev Psychol. 1991; 27: 79–84.

17.

Langlois

J.H.

Roggman

L.A.

Musselman

What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?

Psychological Science. 1994; 5: 214–220.

18.

Maret

S.M.

Harling

G.A.

Cross cultural perceptions of physical attractiveness: ratings of photos of whites by Cruzans and Americans.

Percep Mot Skills. 1985; 60: 163–166.

19.

Nakamura

Kawashima

Nagumo

Ito

Sugiura

Kato

Nakamura

Hatano

Kubota

Fukuda

Kojima

Neuro-anatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness.

Neuroreport. 1998; 9: 753–757.

20.

Patzer

G.L.

Practice made perfect. Measurement of physical attractiveness: truth-of-consensus.

J Esthet Dent. 1994; 6: 185–188.

21.

Patzer

G.L.

The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.

22.

Reis

H.T.

Hodgins

H.S.

Reactions to craniofacial disfigurement: lessons from the physical attractiveness and stigma literatures. In: Eder

R.A.

, ed. Craniofacial Anomalies: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995: 177–198.

23.

Roberts-Harry

D.P.

Evans

Hathorn

I.S.

The effects of different surgical regimens on nasal symmetry and facial attractiveness in cleft lip and palate patients.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 28: 274–278.

24.

Samuels

C.A.

Butterworth

Roberts

Graupner

Hole

Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.

Perception. 1994; 23: 823–831.

25.

Schneiderman

C.R.

Harding

J.B.

Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 190–193.

26.

Shaw

W.C.

The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults.

Am J Orthod. 1981; 79: 399–415.

27.

Slade

Bishop

S.C.

Jowett

R.A.

Relationship between cleft severity and attractiveness of newborns with unrepaired clefts.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 318–322.

28.

Speltz

M.L.

Galbreath

Greenberg

M.T.

A developmental framework for psychosocial research on young children with craniofacial anomalies. In: Eder

R.A.

, ed. Craniofacial Anomalies: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995: 258–286.

29.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Psychosocial correlates of congenital facial clefts: a conceptualization and model.

Cleft Palate J. 1984; 21: 131–139.

30.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Scaling facial impairment.

Cleft Palate J. 1989; 26: 249–254.

31.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Social judgements of facial deformity.

Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 323–327.

32.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Social psychological model of craniofacial anomalies: example of cleft lip and palate. In: Eder

R.A.

, ed. Craniofacial Anomalies: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995: 233–257.

33.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Hiebert

J.M.

Clefting and psychosocial adjustment: influence of facial aesthetics.

Clin Plast Surg. 1993a; 20: 623–631.

34.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Hiebert

J.M.

Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993b; 30: 82–86.

35.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Hiebert

J.M.

Reliability of aesthetic ratings of cleft impairments.

Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25: 313–317.

36.

Tobiasen

J.M.

Hiebert

J.M.

Boraz

R.A.

Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 419–424.

37.

Vermeij-Keers

Craniofacial embryology and morphogenesis: normal and abnormal. In: Stricker

Van der Meulen

J.C.

Raphael

Mazzola

Tolhurst

D.E.

Murray

J.E.

, eds. Craniofacial Malformations. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1990: 27–60.

38.

Vermeij-Keers

, Mazzola RF, Van der Meulen JC, Stricker M. Cerebro-craniofacial and craniofacial malformations: an embryological analysis. Cleft Palate J. 1983; 20: 128–145.

39.

Zebrowitz

L.A.

Collins

M.A.

Dutta

The relationship between appearance and personality across the life span.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1998; 24: 736–749.