The Correlation between Nasalance and a Differentiated Perceptual Rating of Speech in Dutch Patients with Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Abstract

Objective:

The correlation between the nasalance score and the perceptual rating of several aspects of speech of speakers with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) by six speech-language pathologists was evaluated.

Procedure:

The overall grade of severity, hypernasality, audible nasal emission, misarticulations, and intelligibility were rated on visual analog scales. Speech samples with a normal distribution of phonemes (normal text [NT]) and those free of nasal consonants (denasal text [DT]) of 43 patients with VPI were used. Mean nasalance scores were computed for the speech samples, and Spearman correlation coefficients were computed between the mean nasalance score and the five parameters of the differentiated rating.

Setting:

The Institute of Phoniatrics, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.

Results:

The correlation coefficient between the mean nasalance and the perceptual rating of hypernasality ranged among judges from .31 to .56 for NT speech samples and .36 to .60 for DT speech samples. Only small differences were found between speech pathologists with and without expertise in cleft palate speech. The rating of the overall grade of severity appeared to correlate quite well with the rating of the intelligibility (r_NT = .77, r_DT = .79). Lower correlation coefficients, ranging from .34 to .71, were found between overall grade of severity and hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and mis-articulations.

Conclusions:

A low correlation between the nasalance and the perceptual rating of hypernasality was found. The parameter overall grade of severity appeared to be determined mainly by the parameter intelligibility. Expertise in rating of cleft palate speech does not guarantee a high correlation between instrumental measurement and perceptual rating.

Keywords

acoustic nasometry cleft palate speech correlation differentiated perceptual rating Dutch nasalance

References

Bzoch

K.R.

. Measurement and assessment of categorical aspects of cleft palate speech. In: Bzoch

K.R.

, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1989: 137–173.

Carney

P.J.

, Sherman

. Severity of nasality in three selected speech tasks. J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 396–407.

Croatto

. L'évaluation phoniatrique de l'insuffisance vélopharyngienne. Bull Audiophonol. 1984; 17: 163–175.

Dalston

R.M.

, Neiman

G.S.

, Gonzalez-Landa

. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 285–291.

Dalston

R.M.

, Seaver

E.J.

. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 17–21.

Dalston

R.M.

, Warren

. Comparison of Tonar II, pressure-flow, and listener judgments of hypernasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23: 108–115.

Dalston

R.M.

, Warren

D.W.

, Dalston

E.T.

. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 184–188.

Dejonckere

P.H.

, Obbens

, De Moor

G.M.

, Wieneke

G.H.

. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr. 1993; 45: 76–83.

Dejonckere

P.H.

, Remacle

, Fresnel-Elbaz

, Woisard

, Crevier-Buchman

, Millet

. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord.) 1996; 117: 219–224.

10.

Fletcher

S.G.

. Diagnosing Speech Disorders From Cleft Palate. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1978: 92–157.

11.

Fletcher

S.G.

. ‘Nasalance’ vs listener judgements of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1976; 13: 31–44.

12.

Fletcher

S.G.

, Adams

L.E.

, McCutcheon

M.J.

. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. In: Bzoch

K.R.

, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little, Brown; 1989: 246–257.

13.

Haapanen

M-L

. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr. 1991; 43: 197–203.

14.

Hardin

M.A.

, Van Demark

D.R.

, Morris

H.L.

, Payne

M.M.

. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 346–351.

15.

Heppt

, Westrich

, Strate

, Moering

. Nasalanz: Ein neuer Begriff der objectiven Nasalitaetsanalyse Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 1991; 70: 208–213.

16.

Hirschberg

, van Demark

D.R.

. A proposal for standardization of speech and hearing evaluations to assess velopharyngeal function. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997; 49: 158–167.

17.

Karling

, Larson

, Leanderson

, Henningsson

. Speech in unilateral and bilateral cleft palate patients from Stockholm. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 73–77.

18.

Karnell

M.P.

. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 145–148.

19.

Kavanagh

J.L.

, Fee

E.J.

, Kalinowski

, Doyle

P.C.

, Leeper

H.A.

. Nasometric values for three dialectal groups within the Atlantic provinces of Canada. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1994; 18: 7–13.

20.

Keuning

K.H.D.

, Wieneke

G.H.

, Dejonckere

P.H.

. The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 328–333.

21.

Kreiman

, Gerratt

B.R.

, Kempster

G.B.

, Erman

, Berke

G.S.

. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res. 1993; 36: 21–40.

22.

McWilliams

B.J.

, Morris

H.L.

, Shelton

R.J.

. Cleft Palate Speech. Philadelphia and Toronto: BC Decker; 1990.

23.

Nellis

J.L.

, Neiman

G.S.

, Lehman

J.A.

. Comparison of nasometer and listener judgements of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 157–163.

24.

Pommez

, Rebufy

. L'examen phoniatrique de l'insuffisance vélaire congénitale. Rev Laryngol. 1987; 108: 299–305.

25.

Santos-Terron

M.J.

, Gonzalez-Landa

, Sanchez-Ruiz

. Patrones normales del nasometer en ninos de habla castellana [nasometric patterns in the speech of normal child speakers of Castilian Spanish]. Rev Esp Foniatr. 1991; 4: 71–75.

26.

Schmelzeisen

, Hausamen

J.E.

, Loebell

, Hacki

. Long-term results following velopharyngoplasty with a cranially based pharyngeal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90: 774–778.

27.

Seaver

E.J.

, Dalston

R.M.

, Leeper

H.A.

, Adams

L.E.

. A study of nasometric values for normal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34: 715–721.

28.

Tachimura

, Mori

, Hirata

, Wada

. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of mid-west Japanese dialect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 463–467.

29.

Van Demark

D.R.

. A comparison of the results of pressure articulation testing in various contexts for subjects with cleft palates. J Speech Hear Res. 1970; 13: 741–754.

30.

Van Demark

D.R.

. Misarticulations and listener judgements of the speech of individuals with cleft palates. Cleft Palate J. 1964; 1: 232–245.

31.

van de Weyer

J.C.

, Slis

I.H.

. Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer. Logoped Foniatr. 1991; 63: 97–101.

32.

Van Doorn

, Purcell

. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998; 35: 287–292.

33.

Watterson

, Hinton

, McFarlane

SC.

. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996; 33: 67–73.

34.

Watterson

, McFarlane

S.C.

, Wright

D.S.

. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. J Commun Disord. 1993; 26: 13–28.

35.

Wise

C.M.

. Applied Phonetics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1957.