The Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) has adopted a community approach to smoking cessation. State-of-the-art interventions that have proven efficacious for smoking cessation are delivered to smokers through community-based organizations. An innovative adaptation of community organization methods accommodated the need for a standardized protocol with the flexibility required for diverse and unique communities. The unique characteristics of the eleven intervention communities are examined with a focus on differences in size, location, availability and importance of the intervention channels, and other factors that were important for community mobilization. Initial results of the mobilization process are summarized. Although there were some differences in the structures formed and the time required to complete the initial project activities, all eleven intervention sites were mobilized around the COMMIT goals and activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 89-8411, Prepublication version, 1989.
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, DHHS Publication No. (CDC) 88-8406, 1988.
3.
IversonD. C., Smoking Control Programs: Premises and Promises, American Journal of Health Promotion, 1: 3, pp. 16–31, 1987.
4.
OckeneJ. K. and CamicP. M., Public Health Approaches to Cigarette Smoking Cessation, Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 7, pp. 14–18, 1985.
5.
AbramsD. B.ElderJ. P.CarletonR. A.LasaterT. M., and ArtzL. M., Social Learning Principles for Organizational Health Promotion: An Integrated Approach, in Health and Industry: A Behavioral Medicine Perspective, CataldoM. F. and CoatesT. J. (eds.), Wiley-Interscience Publications, New York, 1986.
6.
FeinhandlerS. J., The Social Role of Smoking, in Smoking and Society, TollinsonR. D. (ed.), Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1986.
7.
McAlisterA.PuskaP.SalonenJ. T.ToumilehtoJ., and KoskelaK., Theory and Action for Health Promotion: Illustrations from the North Karelia Project, American Journal of Public Health, 72, pp. 43–50, 1982.
8.
SussmanS., Two Social Influence Perspectives of Tobacco Use Development and Prevention, Health Education Research, 4: 2, pp. 213–223, 1989.
9.
MacCobyN., The Community as a Focus for Health Promotion, in The Social Psychology of Health, SpacapanS. and OskampS. (eds.), Sage Publications, Newberry Park, California, 1988.
10.
OmennG. S.ThompsonB.SextonM.HessolN.BreitensteinB.CurryS.MichnickM., and PetersonA., A Randomized Comparison of Worksite-Sponsored Smoking Cessation Programs, American Journal of Prevention Medicine, 4: 5, pp. 261–267, 1988.
11.
MillarW. J. and NaegeleB. E., Time to Quit: Community Involvement in Smoking Cessation, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 78, pp. 109–114, 1987.
12.
WandersmanA. and FlorinP., An Introduction to Citizen Participation, Voluntary Organizations and Community Development: Insights for Empowerment through Research, American Journal of Community Psychology, 1989.
13.
EnglundA., Strategies for Prevention: Role of Voluntary and Community Organizations in Implementation, Cancer Detection and Prevention, 9, pp. 413–415, 1986.
14.
WallackL., A Community Approach to the Prevention of Alcohol-Related Problems: The San Francisco Experience, International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 5: 2, pp. 85–102, 1985.
15.
WallackL. and BarrowsD., Preventing Alcohol Problems in California: Evaluation of the Three Year “Winners” Program, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Sacramento, California, 1981.
16.
RaeburnJ. M. and SeymourF. W., A Simple Systems Model for Community Programs, Journal of Community Psychology, 7, pp. 290–297, 1979.
17.
StunkardA. J.FelixM. R. J., and CohenR. Y., Mobilizing a Community to Promote Health, in Prevention in Health Psychology, RosenJ. C. and SolomonL. J. (eds.), University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1985.
18.
RobertsonI., Sociology, Worth Publishers, New York, 1977.
19.
PertschukM. and ShoplandD. R., Major Local Smoking Ordinances in the United States, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 90-479, September, 1989.
20.
WarnerK. E., Smoking and Health Implications of a Change in the Federal Cigarette Excise Tax, Journal of the American Medical Association, 255: 8, pp. 1028–1032, February 28, 1986.
21.
LewitE. M. and CoateD., The Potential for Using Excise Taxes to Reduce Smoking, Journal of Health Economics, 1: 2, pp. 121–145, 1982.
22.
FarquharJ., The Community-Based Model of Life Style Intervention Trials, American Journal of Epidemiology, 108, pp. 103–111, 1978.
23.
KellyJ. G., Tain't What You Do, It's the Way You Do It, American Journal of Community Psychology, 7, pp. 239–261, 1979.
24.
BlackburnH., Research and Demonstration Projects in Community Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Journal of Public Health Policy, 4, pp. 398–421, 1983.
25.
GreenL. W., The Theory of Participation: A Qualitative Analysis of Its Expression in National and International Health Politics, Advances in Health Education and Promotion: Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1986.
26.
KurjiK.OstbyeT., and BhattiT., Initiating Community Self-Help: A Model for Public Health Workers, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 79, pp. 208–209, 1988.
27.
LabonteR., Community Empowerment: The Need for Political Analysis, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 80, pp. 87–91, 1989.
28.
CrosbyN.KellyJ. M., and SchaeferP., Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation, Public Administration Review, 46: 2, pp. 170–178, 1986.
29.
GarroL. C.RouletteJ., and WhitmoreR. G., Community Control of Health Care Delivery: The Sandy Bay Experience, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 77, pp. 281–284, 1986.
30.
AllenR. F. and AllenJ., A Sense of Community, a Shared Vision and a Positive Culture: Core Enabling Factors in Successful Culture Based Health Promotion, American Journal of Health Promotion, 1: 3, pp. 40–47, 1987.
31.
GoodmanR. M. and StecklerA., A Model for the Institutionalization of Health Promotion Programs, Community Health, 11: 4, pp. 63–78, 1989.
32.
ChavisD. M.StuckyP. E., and WandersmanA., Returning Basic Research to the Community: A Relationship between Scientist and Citizen, American Psychologist, 36: 4, pp. 424–434, 1983.
33.
RothmanJ., Three Models of Community Organization Practice, in Strategies of Community Organization, CoxF. M.ErlichJ. L.RothmanJ., and TropmanR. E. (eds.), Peacock, Itasca, Illinois, 1979.
34.
WallackL. and SciandraR., Media Advocacy and Public Education in the Community Intervention Trial to Reduce Heavy Smoking (COMMIT), International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11: 3, pp. 205–222, 1990–91.
35.
OckeneJ. K.LindsayE. L.BergerL., and HymowitzN., Health Care Providers as Key Change Agents in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), International Quarterly of Community Health, 11: 3, pp. 223–2371990–91.
36.
SorensenG.GlasgowR. E., and CorbettK., Promoting Smoking Control through Worksites in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11: 3, pp. 239–257, 1990–91.
37.
PomrehnP.SciandraR.ShipleyR.LynnW., and LandoH., Enhancing Resources for Smoking Cessation through Community Intervention: COMMIT as a Prototype, International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11: 3, pp. 259–269, 1990–91.
38.
SmithR. A., Community Structural Characteristics and the Adoption of Fluoridation, American Journal of Public Health, 71, pp. 24–30, 1981.
39.
CorbettK.ThompsonB.WhiteN., and TaylorM., Process Evaluation in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11: 3, pp. 291–309, 1990–91.
40.
MattsonM. E.CummingsK. M.LynnW. R.GiffenC.CorleD., and PechacekT., Evaluation Plan for the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 11: 3, pp. 271–290, 1990–91.
