There is considerable evidence that brief group psychoeducational programs for cancer patients, offering support and some training in coping skills, may have lasting beneficial effects on mood and quality of life.
Objective:
to compare two different formats of a brief, group psychoeducational program for cancer patients; a standard format of six weekly two-hour sessions or a “weekend intensive,” involving the same content and contact time compressed into two days.
Method:
Cancer patients were randomly assigned to either the standard weekly intervention (n = 77) or the weekend program (n = 79). Two assessment measures were used: Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Functional Living Index for Cancer (FLIC). Assessments were made before and after each intervention and at a nineteen-week follow-up.
Results:
While the two formats were found to be equivalent in their overall effects on mood and quality of life, there were some differences. There was a sudden, large improvement in mood by the end of the weekend version of the course (2-day time point) but this did not persist, and by the six-week point and again at nineteen-weeks, mood improvement was the same for both groups. Quality of life improvement seemed to be marginally greater with the six-weekly sessions (reaching statistical significance at the 6-week point).
Conclusions:
The two formats produced similar improvements in both mood and quality of life. We discuss the need for further studies to find optimal ways of presenting such help for different patient groups.
YalomI. D. and GreavesC.Group Therapy with the Terminally Ill, American Journal of Psychiatry, 134: 396–400, 1977.
2.
WeismanA. D.WordenJ. W., and SobelH. J., Psychosocial Screening and Intervention with Cancer Patients, (Project Omega, Grant No. CA-19797), Boston, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1980.
3.
TelchC. F. and TelchM. J.Psychological Approaches for Enhancing Coping among Cancer Patients: A Review, Clinical Psychological Review, 5: 325–344, 1985.
4.
TaylorS. E.FalkeR. L.ShoptawS. J., and LichtmanR. R.Social Support Groups and the Cancer Patient, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54: 608–615, 1986.
5.
CunninghamA. J., From Neglect to Support to Coping: The Evolution of Psychosocial Intervention for Cancer Patients, in Stress and Breast Cancer, CooperC. (ed.), John Wiley, New York, pp. 135–154, 1988.
6.
GreerS.Can Psychological Therapy Improve the Quality of Life of Patients with Cancer?British Journal of Cancer, 59: 149–151, 1989.
7.
MassieM. J.HollandJ. C., and StrakerN., Psychotherapeutic Interventions, in Handbook of Psychooncology, HollandJ. C. and RowlandJ. H. (eds.), Oxford University Press, pp. 455–469, 1989.
8.
AndersonB. L.Psychological Interventions for Cancer Patients to Enhance the Quality of Life, Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 60: 552–568, 1992.
9.
TrijsburgR. W.Van KnippenbergF. C. E., and RijpmaS. E.Effects of Psychological Treatment on Cancer Patients: A Critical Review, Psychosomatic Medicine, 54: 489–517, 1992.
10.
KrupnickJ. L.RowlandJ. H.GoldbergR. L., and DanielU. V.Professionally-led Support Groups for Cancer Patients: An Intervention in Search of a Model, International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 23: 275–294, 1993.
11.
FordM. F.JonesM.ScannellT.PowellA.CoombesR. C., and EvansC.Is Group Psychotherapy Feasible for Oncology Out-patient Attenders Selected on the Basis of Psychological Morbidity?British Journal of Cancer, 62: 624–626, 1990.
12.
PresbergB. A. and LevensonJ. L.A Survey of Cancer Support Groups Provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Clinical and Comprehensive Centers, Psychooncology, 2: 215–217, 1993.
13.
D. F. Cella and S. B. Yellen, Cancer Support GroupsThe State of the Art, Cancer Practice, 1: 1–6, 1993.
14.
SpiegelD.BloomJ. R., and YalomI.Group Support for Patients with Metastatic Cancer, Archives of General Psychiatry, 38: 527–533, 1981.
15.
ZimpferD. G.Psychosocial Treatment of Life-threatening Disease: A Wellness Model, Journal of Counseling and Development, 71: 203–209, 1992.
16.
TelchC. F. and TelchM. J.Group Coping Skills Instruction and Supportive Group Therapy for Cancer Patients: A Comparison of Strategies, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54: 802–808, 1986.
17.
CunninghamA. J. and ToccoE. K.A Randomized Trial of Group Psychoeducational Therapy for Cancer Patients, Patient Education and Counseling, 14: 101–114, 1989.
18.
MastrovitoR., Behavioral Techniques: Progressive Relaxation and Self-regulatory Therapies, in Handbook of Psychooncology, HollandJ. C. and RowlandJ. H. (eds), Oxford University Press, pp. 492–501, 1989.
19.
FawzyF. I. and FawzyN. W.A Structured Psychoeducational Intervention for Cancer Patients, General Hospital Psychiatry, 16: 142–192, 1994.
20.
SpiegelD.BloomJ. R.KraemerH. C., and GottheilE.Effect of Psychosocial Treatment on Survival of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer, Lancet, ii: 888–891, 1989.
21.
FawzyF. I.FawzyN. W.HyunC. S.ElashoffR.GuthrieD.FaheyJ. L., and MortonD. L.Malignant Melanoma. Effects of an Early Structured Psychiatric Intervention, Coping and Affective State on Recurrence and Survival 6 Years Later, Archives of General Psychiatry, 50: 681–689, 1993.
22.
IlnyckyjA.FarberJ.CheangM. C., and WeinermanB. H.A Randomised Controlled Trial of Psychotherapeutic Intervention in Cancer Patients, Annals Royal College of Physicians & Surgeons of Canada, 27: 93–96, 1994.
23.
CunninghamA. J.EdmondsC. V. I.HampsonA. W.HansonH.HovanecM.JenkinsG., and ToccoG. K.Helping Cancer Patients Cope With, and Combat, Their Disease: A Group Psychoeducational Program, Advances, 7(3): 41–56, 1991.
24.
CunninghamA. J.LockwoodG. A., and CunninghamJ. A.A Relationship between Perceived Self-efficacy and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients, Patient Education and Counselling, 17: 71–78, 1991.
25.
CunninghamA. J.LockwoodG. A., and EdmondsC. V.Which Cancer Patients Benefit Most from a Brief, Group, Coping Skills Program?International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 23: 383–398, 1993.
26.
KilmanP. R.SotileW. M., and FritzK. R.Marathon versus Weekly Encounter-group Treatment on Self-actualization: Two Years Later, Group and Organization Studies, 3: 483–488, 1978.
27.
CunninghamA. J., Helping Yourself (workbook and 2 audiotapes), Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, 1989.
28.
McNairD. M.LorrM., and DropplemanL. F., Profile of Mood States, Manual, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, California, 1971–1981.
29.
SchipperH.ClinchJ.McMurrayA., and LevittM.Measuring the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: The Functional Living Index-Cancer: Development and Validation, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2: 472–483, 1984.
30.
GanzP. A.LeeJ. J., and SiauJ.Quality of Life Assessment, An Independent Prognostic Variable for Survival in Lung Cancer, Cancer, 67: 3131–3135, 1991.
31.
J. C. Ruckdeschel, S. Piantadosi, and the Lung Cancer Study Group, Quality of Life Assessment in Lung Surgery for Bronchogenic Carcinoma, Journal of Thoracic Surgery, 6: 201–205, 1991.
32.
DonovanK.Sanson-FisherR. W., and RedmanS.Measuring Quality of Life in Cancer Patients, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 7: 959–968, 1989.
SAS Institute Inc., SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 1985.
35.
SutherlandH. J.LockwoodG. A., and CunninghamA. J.A Simple, Rapid Method for Assessing Psychological Distress in Cancer Patients: Evidence of Validity for Linear Analogue Scales, Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 7: 31–43, 1989.
