Persistence of Adult Undergraduates on a Traditionally-Oriented University Campus: Does Donaldson and Graham's Model of College Outcomes for Adult Students Still Apply?
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2011
Persistence of Adult Undergraduates on a Traditionally-Oriented University Campus: Does Donaldson and Graham's Model of College Outcomes for Adult Students Still Apply?
The purpose of this study was to explore the social and academic experiences of non-traditional students pursuing a bachelor's degree at a traditionally-oriented residential university and how these experiences promote or impede their persistence to graduation. The study explored components of Donaldson and Graham's Model of College Outcomes for Adult Students and confirmed their proposed influences, including prior experience and personal biographies, adult cognition, psycho-social and value orientation, life-world environment, and the connecting classroom. Three additional specific findings focused on a strong personal striving characteristic among students, the motivation to attend and stay in college to be role models for their children, and gender difference regarding the use of and expectation for faculty support.
References
1.
AstinA. (1998). The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966–1996. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 115–135.
2.
BeanJ., & MetznerB. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540.
3.
BrownS. (2002). Strategies that contribute to nontraditional/adult student development and persistence. PACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 11, 67–76.
4.
CalcagnoaJ.CrostaP.BaileyT., & JenkinsD. (2006). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on old community college student outcomes. New York: Community College Research Center, Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University.
5.
ComptonJ. I.CoxE., & LaananF. S. (2006). Adult learner in transition. New Directions for Student Services, 114, 73–80.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
7.
CubetaJ.TraversN., & SheckleyB. (2001). Predicting the academic success of adults from diverse populations. Journal of College Student Retention, 2(4), 295–311.
8.
DonaldsonJ., & GrahamS. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(1), 24–40.
9.
HagedornL. (1999). Factors related to the retention of female graduate students over 30. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(2), 99–114.
10.
HarringtonJ. (1993). Why they stay: A study on the persistence of reentry women. Initiatives, 55(4), 17–24.
11.
HughesJ., & GrahamS. (1990). Adult life roles: A new approach to adult development. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 38(2), 2–8.
12.
JusticeE. M., & DornanT. M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and non-traditional age college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 236–249.
13.
KasserT., & SheldonK. (2001). Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and psychological maturity across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 491–501.
14.
KaswormC. E. (1997, March). Adult meaning making in the undergraduate classroom. Paper presented at the American Association of Adult and Continuing Education Conference, Kansas City, MO.
15.
KaswormC. E. (2002). Responding to adult learners in higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
16.
KaswormC. E. (2003). Adult meaning making in the undergraduate classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(2), 81–98.
17.
KaswormC. E. (2005). Adult student identity in an intergenerational community college classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(1), 3–20.
18.
KaswormC. E. (2008). Emotional challenges of adult learners in higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 27–34.
19.
KaswormC., & PikeG. (1994). Adult undergraduate students: Evaluating the appropriateness of a traditional model of academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 689–710.
20.
KennedyP., & SheckleyB. (1999). Attrition and persistence in higher education: A review of the literature. College Park, MD: Institute for Research on Adults in Higher Education, University of Maryland University College.
21.
GiancolaKohler J.MunzD. C., & TraresS. (2008). First-versus continuing-generation adult students on college perceptions: Are differences actually because of demographic variance?Adult Education Quarterly, 58, 214–228.
22.
MartinP., & SheckleyB. (1999). Indicators of client satisfaction in academic, career and personal counseling in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 289–310.
23.
MerriamS., & CaffarellaR. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
PascarellaE. (Ed.). (1982). Studying student attrition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
PhilibertN.AllenJ., & EllevenR. (2008). Nontraditional students in community colleges and the model of college outcomes for adults. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 582–596.
SandlerM. (2000). Career decision-making self efficacy, perceived stress, and an integrated model of student persistence: A structural model of finances, attitudes, behavior and career development. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 537–580.
29.
TintoV. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.
30.
TintoV. (2006–2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next?Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1–20.
31.
TweedellC. (2000, October). A theory of adult learning and implications for practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
