Teaching Real-World Issues: Comparison of Written versus Annotated Still Image Case Study

Abstract

A well-accepted method of bringing real-world issues to students is the use of case studies. This method was modified by bringing a manager to the classroom electronically using two picture phone systems. The project manager presented current issues from the project site with the help of still images. Students and the manager interacted using speakerphones. This article compares the effectiveness of the two methods, written case studies and information technology based case studies, for teaching project management issues. The effectiveness of both methods were evaluated based on the four constructs of useful, challenging, clear, and attractive. A survey instrument was administered at the end of each case study and the responses were analyzed. The information technology based method was found to be more useful, attractive and challenging than the written case studies. The students preferred the new method irrespective of their GPA or their work experience. Their written comments in addition to the statistical results suggest that this method exposed the students to important issues in project management.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Leidner

D. E.

Jarvenpaa

S. L.

, The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms, Information Systems Research, 4: 1, pp. 24–54, March 1993.

Aldridge

M. D.

, Professional Practice: A Topic for Engineering Research and Instruction, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 1–6, June 1994.

Winterburn

, Case Study Method in Management Development, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 1987.

Ellington

H. I.

Harris

, Dictionary of Instructional Technology, Kogan Page, London, 1986.

Yin

R. K.

, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.

Fish

R. S.

Kraut

R. E.

Root

R. W.

Rice

R. E.

, Video as a Technology for Informal Communication, Communications of the ACM, 36: 1, pp. 48–61, January 1993.

Payne

(ed.), Education in the Age of Information: The Challenge of Technology, Manchester University Press, Manchester, United Kingdom, 1993.

Spizizen

Hart

C. W. L.

, Active Learning and the Case Method: Theory and Practice, The Journal of Hospitality Education, pp. 63–66, August 1985.

O'Reilly

, What's Killing the Business School Deans of America, Fortune, 130: 3, pp. 64–68, August 8, 1994.

10.

Dertouzos

Lester

R. K.

Solow

R. M.

MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity, Made in America: Regaining the Productivity Edge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989.

11.

Bobrowski

P. M.

Kumar

, Learning Project Management Outside the Classroom: The Internship, Project Management Journal, XXIII: 1, pp. 27–31, 1992.

12.

Einsiedel

, Profile of Effective Project Managers, Project Management Journal, XVIII: 5, pp. 51–56, 1987.

13.

Champness

deAlberdi

, Measuring Subjective Reactions to Teletext Page Design, NSF Grant DAR-7924489-AO2, Alternate Media Center, New York University, New York, 1981.

14.

Kydd

C. T.

Ferry

D. L.

, Computer Supported Cooperative Work Tools and Media Richness; An Integration of the Literature, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Vol. III, IEEE Society Press, Los Alamos, California, pp. 324–332, 1991.

15.

Feagin

J. R.

Orum

A. M.

Sjoberg

, A Case for the Case Study, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1991.

16.

Armjio

E. J.

Stowitschek

J. J.

Smith

A. J.

McKee

C. M.

Solheim

K. J.

Phillips

R. D.

, CARAS: A School-based Care Management System for At-risk Students, Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 21: 11, pp. 66–71, June 1994.

17.

Caines

, Policies for the Future in the UK, in Education in the Age of Information: The Challenge of Technology, Payne

(ed.), Manchester University Press, London, pp. 7–17, 1993.

18.

Nunnally

, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

19.

Treacy

, An Empirical Evaluation of a Causal Model of User Information Satisfaction, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis, Indiana, pp. 285–287, December 1985.

20.

Myers

I. B.

, Gifts Differing, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1980.

21.

Chidambaram

Jones

, Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings, MIS Quarterly, pp. 465–491, December 1993.