School-based tobacco prevention programs have been proven effective in reducing tobacco use. This evaluation aimed to assess the impact of an online tobacco prevention teacher training program on teachers and their students in Florida schools. A total of 344 teachers, including 72 K-3 grade teachers, 44 4th-5th grade teachers, and 228 6th-12th grade teachers completed the online training program and 323 (93.9%) were followed up to assess impacts on their 6,490 students. Results suggested that the online tobacco prevention education program for teachers was effective with high satisfaction and the impact on students was significant in improving knowledge and attitude about tobacco use and in increasing the proportion of 6–12th grade students who decided not to use tobacco. The evaluation study recommended the online education program be continued and expanded in the future.
References
1.
AtkinsonT. S., & O'ConnorK. A. (2007). Establishing professional development partnerships online: Reaching out to veteran teachers. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 51(3), 21–29.
2.
BaskaT.StrakaS.BaskovaM., & MadarR. (2004). Effectiveness of school programs in tobacco control. Central European Journal of Public Health, 12(4), 184–186.
3.
BullerD. B.BorlandR.WoodallW. G.HallJ. R.HinesJ. M.Burris-WoodallP. (2008). Randomized trials on Consider This, a tailored, internet-delivered smoking prevention program for adolescents. Health Education & Behavior, 35(2), 260–281.
4.
CarterK. (2004). Online training: What's really working? What does today's successful online professional development look like?Technology & Learning, 24(10), 32.
5.
CatoB.ChenW. W., & Corbett-PerezS. (1998). Logic Model—A tool for planning and evaluating health and recreation prevention projects. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 69(8), 57–61.
ChenW. W., & CatoB. (1999). Using a Logic Model to plan and evaluate community intervention program—A case study. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 18(4), 451–460.
8.
ChristensenH.GriffithsK. M., & JormA. F. (2004). Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 328(7434), 265.
9.
DobbinsM.DecorbyK.ManskeS., & GoldblattE. (2008). Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention. Preventive Medicine, 46(4), 289–297.
10.
EversK. E.ProchaskaJ. M.ProchaskaJ. O.DriskellM.CumminsC. O., & VelicerW. F. (2003). Strengths and weaknesses of health behavior change programs of the Internet. Journal of Health Psychology, 8(1), 63–70.
FrayB. R. (2009). School-based smoking prevention programs with the promise of long-term effects. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 5, 6.
13.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G., & SchulenbergJ. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2007. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
14.
LaceyC. H. (2008). Evaluation of the Tobacco Prevention and Intervention Teacher Training Project. Palm Beach, FL: School District of Palm Beach County.
15.
Muller-RiemenschneiderF.BockelbrinkA.ReinholdT.RaschA.GreinerW., & WillichS. N. (2008). Long-term effectiveness of behavioural interventions to prevent smoking among children and youth. Tobacco Control, 17(5), 301–312.
16.
NemireK.BeilJ. A., & SwanR. W. (1999). Preventing teen smoking with virtual reality. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(1), 35–47.
17.
NormanC. D.MaleyO.LiX., & SkinnerH. A. (2008). Using the Internet to assist smoking prevention and cessation in schools: A randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychology, 27(6), 799–810.
18.
PetersonA. V.Jr.KealeyK. A.MannS. L.MarekP. M., & SarasonI. G. (2000). Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: Long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention-results on smoking. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92(24), 1979–1991.
19.
ProkhorovA. V.KelderS. H.ShegogR.MurrayN.PetersR.Jr.Agurcia-Parker (2008). Impact of A Smoking Prevention Interactive Experience (ASPIRE), an interactive, multimedia smoking prevention and cessation curriculum for culturally diverse high-school students. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 10(9), 1477–1485.
20.
Public Health Service. (1964). Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Public Health Service Publication No. 1103. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
21.
RitterbandL. M.Gonder-FrederickL. A.CoxD. J.CliftonA. D.WestR. W., & BorowitzS. M. (2003). Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future. Professional Psychology, 34(5), 527–534.
22.
ShegogR.McAlisterA. L.HuS.FordK. C.MeshackA. F., & PetersR. J. (2005). Use of interactive health communication to affect smoking intentions in middle school students: A pilot test of the “Headbutt” risk assessment program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(5), 334–338.
23.
SkaraS., & SussmanS. (2003). A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Preventive Medicine, 37(5), 451–474.
24.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Using Logic Models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic Model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
25.
WaltersS. T.WrightJ. A., & ShegogR. (2006). A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 31(2), 264–277.
26.
WieheS. E.GarrisonM. M.ChristakisD. A.EbelB. E., & RivaraF. P. (2005). A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(3), 162–169.
27.
World Health Organization (WHO). (1999). Programming for adolescent health and development: Report of a WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF study group on programming for adolescent health. Report 886. Saillon, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
28.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2005). Preventing chronic diseases: A vital investment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/en/
