The Effect of the Texas Instrument Interactive Instructional Environment on the Mathematical Achievement of Eleventh Grade Low Achieving Students

Abstract

Teaching and learning mathematics with technology poses a unique dilemma. If technology is to enhance mathematical achievement (NCTM, 2000), why do documented studies indicate that this may not be the case (Waxman, Connell, & Gray, 2002)? This study looks at the learning environment used when teaching with technology. What in the instructional environment actually maximizes technology's ability to increase mathematical achievement? The instructional environment used with Texas Instrument InterActive software is examined to determine its affect on the mathematical achievement of eleventh grade at-risk students when studying quadratic functions. The Texas Instrument instructional environment uses technology to manipulate mathematical objects to observe patterns, make generalizations, and test conjectures. Technology is used as a tool to perform action on objects and to problem solve.

References

American Mathematical Society. (2005). American mathematical society national policy statement. Retrieved 8/18/2005 from: http://www.ams.org/secretary/nat-policy.html

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Davis

R. B.

(1979, April). Conceptualizing the structures underlying cognitive behavior—The usefulness of “frames.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Heid

M. K.

(2001). Research on mathematics learning in CAS environments. Presented at the 11th annual ICTCM Conference, New Orleans.

Heid

M. K.

(2003). Theories for thinking about the use of CAS in teaching and learning mathematics. In Fey

J. T.

(Ed.), Computer algebra systems in secondary school Mathematics Education (pp. 33–52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Councils of Teachers of Mathematics.

Pinker

(1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Schoenfeld

A. H.

(1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

10.

Shaffer

D. W.

, & Kaput

(1999). Mathematics and virtual vulture: An evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 97–119.

11.

Texas Education Agency. (2005a). Chapter 13, Reliability. Retrieved 8/12/05 from: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdig/chap14.pdf#xml=http://www.tea.state.tx.uswww.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/texis/webinator/search/xml.txt?query=validity&db=db&id=08c170183cf9fab4

12.

Texas Education Agency. (2005b). Chapter 14, Validity. Retrieved 8/12/05 from: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdig/chap14.pdf#xml=http://www.tea.state.tx.uswww.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/texis/webinator/search/xml.txt?query=validity&db=db&id=08c170183cf9fab4

13.

United States Department of Education. (2003). Proven methods: the facts about… investing in what works. Retrieved July 22, 2004 from: http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/whatworks.html

14.

Waxman

Connell

, & Gray

(2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Retrieved 11/29/04 from: http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects/index.html

15.

Wilhelm

Confrey

Castro-Filho

, & Maloney

(1999). Interactive diagrams to address key student conceptions in mathematics. CD-ROM Ed media proceedings 1999, Charlettesville, VA: AACE.