The Role of Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs and Self-Regulation in High School Students' Online Academic Help Seeking: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2013
The Role of Internet-Specific Epistemic Beliefs and Self-Regulation in High School Students' Online Academic Help Seeking: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis
Three instruments (i.e., Internet-specific epistemic beliefs, self-regulation, and online academic help seeking questionnaires) were administered to 319 high school students with the aim of understanding the role of Internetspecific epistemic beliefs and self-regulation in their online academic help seeking. Through a structure equation modeling analysis, the results confirm the mediated effects of self-regulation on the relationships between Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and online academic help seeking. Interestingly, naïve beliefs about how Internet-based knowledge is constructed and sophisticated beliefs about how Internet-based knowledge is evaluated are verified to be linked with the students' online academic help seeking. The results imply that, with the focus on the Internet as a context of information, the positive influences of sophisticated epistemic beliefs on learning might be challenged, and the role of personal epistemic beliefs should be reinterpreted.
References
1.
AkyolZ.GarrisonD. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190.
2.
AlevenV.StahlE.SchwormS.FischerF.WallaceR. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320.
3.
AzevedoR.CromleyJ. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia?Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.
4.
AzevedoR.MoosD. C.GreeneJ. A.WintersF. I.CromleyJ. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72.
5.
BarnardL.LanW. Y.ToY. M.PatonV. O.LaiS. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.
6.
BarnardL.PatonV.LanW. Y. (2008). Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–11.
7.
BartholoméT.StahlE.PieschlS.BrommeR. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 113–129.
8.
BendixenL. D.HartleyK. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 15–30.
9.
BoekaertsM. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457.
10.
BråtenI.StrømsøH. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1027–1042.
11.
BråtenI.StrømsøH. I.SamuelstuenM. S. (2005). The relationship between Internetspecific epistemological beliefs and learning within Internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 141–171.
12.
BuehlM. M.AlexanderP. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 385–418.
13.
BuehlM. M.AlexanderP. A.MurphyP. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3),415–449.
14.
ChengK. H.LiangJ. C.TsaiC. C. (2013). University students' online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 70–77.
15.
ChengK. H.TsaiC. C. (2011). An investigation of Taiwan University students' perceptions of online academic help seeking, and their web-based learning self-efficacy. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 150–157.
16.
DahlT. I.BalsM.TuriA. L. (2005). Are students' beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 257–273.
17.
HodgesC. B. (2005). Self-regulation in web-based courses: A review and the need for research. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(4), 375–383.
18.
HoferB. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378–405.
19.
HoferB. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55.
20.
HoferB. K.PintrichP. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
21.
KarabenickS. A. (1998). Help seeking as a strategic resource. In KarabenickS. A. (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Mäkitalo-SieglK.KohnleC.FischerF. (2011). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 257–266.
24.
MasonL.AriasiN.BoldrinA. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 137–151.
25.
MasonL.BoldrinA.AriasiN. (2010). Searching the web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active?Instructional Science, 38(6), 607–633.
26.
MasonL.BoscoloP. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 103–128.
27.
MuisK. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190.
28.
MuisK.FrancoG. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 27–45.
29.
ParisS. G.ParisA. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.
30.
PerryN. E.VandeKampK. O.MercerL. K.NordbyC. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.
31.
PieschlS.StahlE.BrommeR. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17–37.
32.
PintrichP. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
PintrichP. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
34.
PuustinenM.BernicotJ.Bert-ErboulA. (2011). Written computer-mediated requests for help by French-speaking students: An analysis of their forms and functions. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 281–289.
35.
RyanA. M.PintrichP. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help-seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329–341.
36.
RyanA. M.PatrickH.ShimS. O. (2005). Differential profiles of students identified by their teacher as having avoidant, appropriate or dependent help-seeking tendencies in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 275–285.
37.
SchommerM. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411.
38.
SchwartzN. H.AndersenC.HongN.HowardB.McGeeS. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners' memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 77–93.
39.
SheaP.BidjeranoT. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731.
40.
SheaP.BidjeranoT. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316–326.
41.
SheaP.HayesS.SmithS. U.VickersJ.BidjeranoT.PickettA. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the community of inquiry (CoI) framework. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89–95.
42.
StrømsøH. I.BråtenI. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 91–111.
43.
SungurS.TekkayaC. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 99(5),307–317.
44.
TienF. F.FuT. T. (2008). The correlates of the digital divide and their impact on college student learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 421–436.
45.
TsaiC. C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7), 970–974.
46.
TsaiC. C. (2004). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of the Internet as an ‘epistemological’ tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 525–536.
47.
TuY. W.ShihM.TsaiC. C. (2008). Eighth graders' web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1142–1153.
48.
YangY. F.TsaiC. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72–83.
49.
ZimmermanB. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. E. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
