How Beliefs about Substance Use Differ by Socio-Demographic Characteristics,Individual Experiences,and Neighborhood Environments among Urban Adolescents
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2002
How Beliefs about Substance Use Differ by Socio-Demographic Characteristics,Individual Experiences,and Neighborhood Environments among Urban Adolescents
In this article, we tested a series of Item Response Theory (IRT) models to examine the individual and neighborhood variation in perceived risk along dimensions of substance use (alcohol, marijuana, and hard drugs) and usage patterns (light/experimental use, moderate use, heavy/regular use). Data were gathered from 2266 adolescents aged 9,12, and 15 residing in 79 Chicago neighborhoods. Developmental patterns for age and amount of use were observed whereby older respondents rated alcohol and marijuana as less harmful compared to the younger respondents, but rated hard drugs as more harmful. Risk perceptions were found to be more closely tied to one's direct experience with drugs rather than a general constellation of beliefs. Neighborhood variation in risk perceptions was also observed for hard drugs and three patterns of use, controlling for characteristics of individual residents. Neighborhoods did not vary in risk perceptions toward alcohol use. Individuallevel factors rather than characteristics of the neighborhoods explained the observed neighborhood variation in perceptions toward marijuana use. These findings illustrate the complex links between individual and contextual factors in the development of beliefs about the health risks associated with substance use.
References
1.
DanescoE.KingeryP.CoggershallM., Perceived Risk of Harm from Marijuana Use among Youth in the USA, School Psychology International, 20, pp. 39–56, 1999.
2.
SmithA.RosenthalD., Adolescents' Perceptions of Their Risk Environment, Journal of Adolescence, 18:2, pp. 229–245, 1995.
3.
AndrewsJ.DuncanS. C., The Effect of Attitude on the Development of Adolescent Cigarette Use, Journal of Substance Abuse, 10, pp. 1–7, 1998.
4.
BachmanJ.JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.HumphreysR., Explaining the Recent Decline in Marijuana Use: Differentiating the Effects of Perceived Risks, Disapproval, and General Lifestyle Factors, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 29, pp. 92–112, 1988.
5.
AjzenI.FishbeinM., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980.
6.
RodgersR. W., A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change, Journal of Psychology, 91, pp. 93–114, 1975.
7.
RosenstockI. M.StrecherV. J.BeckerM. H., Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model, Health Education Quarterly, 15:2, pp. 175–183, 1988.
8.
WeinsteinN., Testing Four Competing Theories of Health Protective Behavior, Health Psychology, 12, pp. 324–333, 1993.
9.
GoldmanM. S.BrownS. A.ChristiansenB. A., Expectancy Theory: Thinking about Drinking, in BlaneH. T.LeonardK. E. (eds.), Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism, Guilford Press, New York, 1987.
10.
SzalayL.B.InnA.StrohlJ.B.WilsonL.C., Perceived Harm, Age, and Drug Use: Perceptual and Motivational Dispositions Affecting Drug Use, Journal of Drug Education, 23:4, pp. 333–356, 1993.
11.
LucasW. L.GillhamS. A., Profiles of Drug Use and Attitudes among Young Adolescents, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 4, pp. 41–60, 1995.
12.
PascaleP. J.TrucksisF. E.SylvesterJ., Trends and Sex Differences of Drug Use and Attitudes of High School Students in Northeast Ohio 1977–1983, Journal of Drug Education, 15, pp. 241–251, 1985.
13.
SpignerC.HawkinsW.LorenW., Gender Differences in Perception of Risk Associated with Drug Use among College Students, Woman and Health, 20:1, pp. 87–97, 1993.
14.
RobertsT. G.FournetG. P.PenlandE., A Comparison of the Attitudes toward Alcohol and Drug Use and School Support by Grade Level, Gender, and Ethnicity, Journal of Drug and Alcohol Education, 40:2, pp. 112–127, 1995.
15.
ChassinL.PressonC.RoseJ.ShermanS. J., From Adolescence to Adulthood: Age-Related Changes in Beliefs about Cigarette Smoking in a Midwestern Community Sample, Health Psychology, 20:5, pp. 377–386, 2001.
16.
MyersL. S.VankirkG.GentryT. A.WakefieldJ. A., Drug Attitude Factors: Comparisons of Samples from 1985 and 1992, Journal of Drug Education, 24:3, pp. 207–217, 1994.
17.
PrimaveraL. H.PascalR., A Comparison of Male Users and Nonusers of Marijuana on the Perceived Harmfulness Of Drugs, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 12:1–2, pp. 71–77, 1986.
18.
HittnerJ. B., A Preliminary Analysis of the Perceived Risk of Misusing Multiple Substances, Trait Anxiety and Multiple Motivation, The Journal of Psychology, 131:5, pp. 501–511, 1997.
19.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ., National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring The Future Study, 1975–1999. Volume 1 Secondary School Students, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 2000.
20.
FabriciusW. V.NagoshiC. T.MacKinnonD. P., Beliefs about the Harmfulness of Drug Use in Adults Who Use Different Drugs, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7:1, pp. 52–65, 1993.
21.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B., A Community-Level Theory of Crime, American Journal of Sociology, 4, p. 21, 1994.
22.
SkoganW. G., Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral Decay in American Neighborhoods, The Free Press, New York, 1990.
23.
DemboR.BlountW.SchmeidlerJ.BurgosW., Perceived Environmental Drug Use Risk and the Correlates of Early Drug Use or Nonuse among Inner-City Youth: The Motivated Actor, International Journal of Addictions, 21, pp. 977–1000, 1997.
24.
PetronisK. R.AnthonyJ. C., Perceived Risk of Cocaine Use and Experience with Cocaine: Do They Cluster within US Neighborhoods and Cities?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57, pp. 183–192, 2000.
25.
Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Preliminary Tables from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (Vols. 1 & 2; unpublished), Rockville, Maryland, 1998.
26.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF., Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy, Science, 277, pp. 918–924, 1997.
27.
KandelD. B., Drug and Drinking Behavior among Youth, Annual Review of Sociology, 6, pp. 235–285, 1980.
28.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F.MillerJ. Y., Risk and Protective Factors for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Implications for Substance Abuse Prevention, Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp. 64–105, 1992.
29.
RaudenbushS. W.SampsonR., Ecometrics: Toward a Science of Assessing Ecological Settings, with Application to the Systematic Social Observations of Neighborhoods, Sociological Methodology, 29, pp. 1–41, 1999.
30.
BrykA.RaudenbushS., Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analytic Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, California, 1992.
31.
HambletonR. K.SwaminathanH.RogersH. J., Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Holt, Rinehard and Winston, New York, 1992.
32.
BrykA.RaudenbushS.CongdonR., Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling with the HLM/2L and 3/L Programs, Scientific Software International, Chicago, 1998.
33.
WillsT. A.McNamaraG.VaccoroD., Parental Education Related to Adolescent Stress-Coping and Substance Use: Development of a Mediational Model, Health Psychology, 14:5, pp. 464–478, 1995.
34.
KaoG.TiendaM., Educational Aspirations of Minority Youth, American Journal of Education, 106:3, pp. 349–384, 1998.
35.
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates 1998, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland, DHHS publication SMA 99-3328, 1998.
36.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G., National Survey Results on Drug Use From the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1998 (Vol. 1), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, NIH publication 99-4660, 1999.
37.
WechlerH.MoeykensB.DavenportA.CastilloS.HansenJ., The Adverse Impact of Heavy Episodic Drinkers on Other College Students, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, pp. 41–55, 1995.
38.
HamillR.WilsonT. D.NisbettR. E., Insensitivity to Sample Bias: Generalizing from Atypical Cases, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, pp. 578–589, 1980.
39.
KandelD. B., Stages in Adolescent Involvement in Drug Use, Science, 190, pp. 912–914, 1975.
40.
JessorR.JessorS. L., Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
41.
BanduraA., Self Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change, Psychological Review, 84, pp. 191–215, 1977.
42.
PomerleauO. F.PomerleauC. S.NamenekR. J., Early Experiences with Tobacco among Women Smokers, Ex-Smokers, and Never-Smokers, Addiction, 93, pp. 595–599, 1998.
43.
RountreeP. W.ClaytonR. R., A Contextual Model of Adolescent Alcohol Use Across the Rural and Urban Continuum, Substance Use and Misuse, 34, pp. 495–519, 1999.
44.
RobertsonE.DonnermeyerJ. F., Patterns of Drug Use among Non-Metropolitan and Rural Adults, Substance Use and Misuse, 33:10, pp. 2109–2129, 1998.
45.
ShawC.McKayH., Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1942.
46.
KornhauserR. R., Social Sources of Delinquency, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.
47.
AndersonE., The Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City, W. W. Norton, New York, 1999.
48.
LynamD. R.CaspiA. V.MoffittT. E.LoeberR.NovakR.NovakS. P., Is the Relation between SES and Crime Stronger in Poorer Neighborhoods?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109:4, pp. 563–574, 2000.
49.
NovakS. P.ClaytonR. R., The Influence of School Environment on the Association between Self Regulation and Transitions in Smoking Behavior: A Multi-Level Analysis, Health Psychology, 20, pp. 196–207, 2001.
50.
JohnstonL. D., Toward a Theory of Drug Epidemics, in Persuasive Communication and Drug Abuse Prevention, DonohewL.SypherH. E.BukowskiW. J. (eds), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1991.
