This article examines the assemblages of two Contact period Native American sites: Posey (c. 1650-1700) and Camden (c. 1680-1710). While the collections from these two sites share many similarities, their analysis revealed that occupants of the Posey site had far greater proportions of European material goods than their counterparts at the Camden site. The amount of European artifacts at each site was scant at best, but Posey residents used European artifacts as commodities for trade while Camden inhabitants possessed a number of formal European tools, suggesting that they were more directly integrated into daily activities.
References
1.
ARCHIVES OF MARYLAND1883Archives of Maryland, Vol. I-LXXII, Maryland Historical Society, Baltimore.
2.
AxtellJ.1988After Columbus: Essays in the Ethnohistory of Colonial North America, Oxford University Press, New York.
3.
AxtellJ.1995The Rise and Fall of the Powhatan Empire: Indians in Seventeenth-Century Virginia, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
4.
BarseW.1985A Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Naval Ordnance Station, Indian Head, Maryland, Volume I: Cornwallis Neck, Bullit Neck and Thoroughfare Island, draft report prepared for the Department of the Navy, Chesapeake Division, Naval Facilities Command.
5.
BoyceH. and FryeL.1986Radiocarbon Dating of Archeological Samples from Maryland, Maryland Geological Survey Archeological Studies No. 4, Baltimore.
6.
BradleyJ. W.MahlsteadtT. F., and GibbonsM.1998European Contact and the Continuity of Mortuary Ceremonialism on Cape Cod: An Update from the Corn Hill Site, Truro, MA, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 26:189–199.
7.
CallowayC. G.1997New Worlds for All: Indians, Europeans, and the Remaking of Early America, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
8.
CissnaP. B.1993Algonquians of the Western Shore: Indian/English Relations in the Maryland Colony, 1634-1705, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Middle Atlantic Archeological Conference, Ocean City, Maryland.
9.
DauntonM. and HalpernR. (editors) 1999Empire and Others: British Encounters with Indigenous Peoples, 1600-1850, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
10.
DavidsonT.1993Relations between the Powhatans and the Eastern Shore, in Powhatan Foreign Relations, 1500-1722, RountreeHelen C. (ed.), University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp. 136–153.
11.
De DauphineD.1934A Huguenot Exile in Virginia, The Press of the Pioneer, New York.
12.
DiamondJ. E.1996Terminal Late Woodland/Early Contact Period Settlement Patterns in the Mid-Hudson Valley, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 12, pp. 95–111.
13.
FauszJ. F.1980Amerindian Resistance and Accommodation in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake, paper presented at the Southern Historical Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
14.
FauszJ. F.1982Profits, Pelts, and Power: The “Americanization” of English Culture in the Chesapeake, 1620-1652, paper presented at the American Historical Association Annual Meeting.
15.
FauszJ. F.1984Merging and Emerging Worlds: The Interplay of Anglo-Indian Interest Groups in the Early Chesapeake, 1620-1660, paper presented at the Third Hall of Records Conference, St. Mary's City, Maryland.
16.
FauszJ. F.1985Patterns of Anglo-Indian Aggression and Accommodation along the Mid-Atlantic Coast, in Cultures in Contact: The European Impact on Native Cultural Institutions in Eastern North America, A.D. 1000-1800, FitzhughWilliam W. (ed.), Anthropological Society of Washington Series, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 225–261.
17.
FinnR. R.1987The Belief System of the Powhatan Indians, Quarterly Bulletin of Archaeological Society of Virginia, 42:3, pp. 150–158.
18.
GleachF.1997Powhatan's World and Colonial Virginia: A Conflict of Cultures, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
19.
GoodmanC. G.1984Copper Artifacts in Late Eastern Woodlands Prehistory, CantwellA. M. (ed.), Center for American Archaeology, Evanston, Illinois.
20.
HarmonJ. M.1996The Posey Site Revisited: A Contact Period Native American Village in Cultural Context, paper presented at the 1996 Middle Atlantic Archaeology Conference, Ocean City, Maryland.
21.
HarmonJ. M.1999Archaeological Investigations at The Posey Site (18CH281) and 18CH282 Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center Charles County, Maryland. Draft, prepared for Environmental Division Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Jefferson Patterson Park And Museum Occasional Papers Number 7.
22.
HerrmanA.1673Virginia and Maryland: As it is Planted and Inhabited this Present Year 1670 Surveyed and Exactly Drawn by the Only Labour and Endeavor of Augustine Herrman, John Carter Brown Library, Providence, Rhode Island.
23.
HodgesM. E. N.1981A Brief Relation of Virginia Prehistory: A Summary of Current Ideas on the Cultural History of the Native Inhabitants of Virginia, ca. 10,000 BC to the Present, manuscript on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Richmond, Virginia.
24.
HodgesM. E. N.1986Archaeological Addendum to the Camden National Historic Landmark, Caroline County, Virginia, manuscript on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Richmond, Virginia.
25.
HodgesM. E. N.1993Archaeology of Native American Life in Virginia in the Context of European Contact: Review of Past Research, in The Archaeology of 17th-Century Virginia, ReinhartTheodore R. and PogueDennis J. (eds.), Special Publication 30 of the Archaeology Society of Virginia, pp. 1–65.
26.
KentB. C.1984Susquehanna's Indians, Anthropological Series No. 6, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.
27.
KingJ. A. and ChaneyE. E.2000Did the Chesapeake English Have a Contact Period?, manuscript on file at the Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, St. Leonard, Maryland.
28.
KraftH. C.1989Evidence of Contact and Trade in the Middle Atlantic Region and with the Minisink Indians of the Upper Delaware River Valley, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 5, pp. 77–102.
29.
KraftH. C.1991The Indians of the Lower Hudson Valley at the Time of European Contact, in The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of the Lower Hudson Valley and Neighboring Regions: Essays in Honor of Louis A. Brennan, Occasional Publications in Northeastern Anthropology No. 11, Archaeological Services, Bethlehem, Connecticut, pp. 193–221.
30.
LandonD. B. and ShapiroA.1998Analysis of Faunal Remains from the Posey Site (18CH281), report on file at the Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory, St. Leonard, Maryland.
31.
LenikE. J.1989New Evidence on the Contact Period in Northeastern New Jersey and Southeastern New York, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 5, pp. 103–120.
32.
LightfootK. G.1995Culture Contact Studies: Redefining the Relationship between Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology, American Antiquity, 60:2, pp. 199–217.
33.
MacCordH. A.Sr.1967The Camden Site, Caroline County, Virginia, The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Paper, 2:1, pp. 95–97.
34.
MacCordH. A.Sr.1969Camden Site Report, Quarterly Bulletin of the Archeological Society of Virginia, 24:1, pp. 1–55.
35.
MacCordH. A.Sr.1969The Contact Period in Virginia, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 5, pp. 121–128.
36.
MacCordH. A.Sr.1995Contact Ethnography in the Middle Atlantic Region, Part II, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 11, pp. 139–150.
37.
MillerC. L. and HamellG. R.1986A New Perspective on Indian-White Contact: Cultural Symbols and Colonial Trade, The Journal of American History, 73:2, pp. 311–328.
38.
MoreauJ. F.1698Traditions and Cultural Transformations: European Copper-Based Kettles and Jesuit Rings from 17th Century Amerindian Sites, North American Archaeologist, 19:1, pp. 1–11.
39.
MorganP. D.1999Encounters between British and “Indigenous” Peoples, c. 1500-1800, in Empire and Others: British Encounters with Indigenous Peoples, 1600-1850, DauntonMartin and HalpernRick (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 42–78.
40.
ObergM. L.1999Dominion and Civility: English Imperialism and Native America, 1585-1685, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
41.
PotterS. R.1989Early English Effects on Virginia Algonquian Exchange and Tribute in the Tidewater Potomac, in Powhatan's Mantle: Indians in the Colonial Southeast, WoodPeterWaselkovGregory, and HatleyThomas (eds.), University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 151–172.
42.
PotterS. R.1993Commoners, Tribute, and Chiefs: The Development of Algonquian Culture in the Potomac Valley, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.
43.
SahlinsM.1993“Goodbye to tristies tropes,”Journal Modern History, 65, pp. 1–25.
44.
SalisburyN.1982Manitou and Providence: Indians, Europeans, and the Making of New England, 1500-1643, Oxford University Press, New York.
45.
SantoneL.1998Resiliency as Resistance: Eastern Woodland Munsee Groups on the Early Colonial Frontier, North American Archaeologist, 19:2, pp. 117–134.
46.
ScarryJ. F. and MaxhamM. D.2002Elite Actors in the Protohistoric: Elite Identities and Interaction with Europeans in the Apalachee and Powhatan Chiefdoms, in Between Contacts and Colonies: Archaeological Perspectives on the Protohistoric Southeast, WessonCameron B. and ReesMark A. (eds.), The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 142–169.
47.
SemmesR.1929Aboriginal Maryland, 1608-1689 in Two Parts, Part Two: The Western Shore, Maryland Historical Magazine, XXIV:3, pp. 195–209.
48.
SillimanS.2001Agency, Practical Politics and the Archaeology of Culture Contact, Journal of Social Archaeologgy, 1:2, pp. 190–209.
49.
StuiverM. and ReimerP.2000Calib Revision 4.3, Radiocarbon Calibration Program, Radiocarbon, 35, pp. 215–230.
50.
ThomasN.1991Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in The Pacific, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
51.
TurnerE. R.1985Socio-Political Organization within the Powhatan Chiefdom and the Effects of European Contact, A.D. 1607-1646, in Cultures in Contact: The European Impact on Native Cultural Institutions in Eastern North America, A.D. 1000-1800, FitzhughWilliam W. (ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 193–224.
52.
UbelakerDouglas and CurtinPhilip D.2001Human Biology of Populations in the Chesapeake Watershed, in Discovering the Chesapeake, CurtinPhilip D.BrushGrace S., and FisherGeorge W. (eds.), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 127–148.
53.
WalshL. S.2001Land Use, Settlement Patterns, and the Impact of European Agriculture, 1620-1820, in Discovering the Chesapeake, CurtinP. D.BrushG. S., and FisherG. W. (eds.), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 220–248.
54.
WaselkovG. A.1989Seventeenth-Century Trade in the Colonial Southeast, Southeastern Archaeology, 8:2, pp. 117–133.
55.
WayP.1999The Cutting Edge of Culture: British Soldiers Encounter Native Americans in the French and Indian War, in Empire and Others: British Encounters with Indigenous Peoples, 1600-1850, DauntonMartin and HalpernRick (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 123–148.
