The author of this article directs his remarks primarily to teachers of literature who may be considering the teaching of technical writing. He shows the similarities existing among the forms of creative, expository, and technical writing. He then cites some of the differences: the interactions of writer, subject, and the audience; the use of graphics; and the emphasis of the practical rather than the aesthetic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MathesJ. C. and StevensonD. W., Designing Technical Reports, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, p. 15, 1976.
2.
McCrimmonJ. M., Writing With a Purpose, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 6th ed., p. 5, 1976.
3.
GorrellR. M. and LairdC., Modern English Handbook, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 6th ed., p. 3, 1976.
4.
CrewsF., The Random House Handbook, Random House, New York, p. 3, 1974.
5.
PickettN. A. and LasterA., Writing and Reading in Technical English, Canfield Press, San Francisco, p. 5, 1970.
6.
FearD. E., Technical Communication, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois, p. 5, 1977.
7.
PauleyS. E., Technical Report Writing Today, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, p. 9, 1973.
8.
Ambiguity: An Exercise in Practical Semantics, Proceedings, the 21st International Technical Communication Conference, STC, 1974.
9.
The Electric Report Card: A Followup on Cassette Grading, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 5:1, 1975.
10.
Inexpensive Visuals for Oral Presentations, with BreidenbachE. J., Technical Communication, 23:2, 1976.
11.
Needs Assessment for Communication System Design, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 6:2, 1976.
12.
System Design for Communication Packages, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 6:3, 1976.
