Examining the Relationship between Gender and Drug-Using Behaviors in Adolescents: The Use of Diagnostic Assessments and Biochemical Analyses of Urine Samples
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1999
Examining the Relationship between Gender and Drug-Using Behaviors in Adolescents: The Use of Diagnostic Assessments and Biochemical Analyses of Urine Samples
The present study examined the relationship between gender and drug-use among adolescents using diagnostic assessments and biochemical analyses of urine samples. The data were collected in the context of a referral and assessment program for adolescents suspected of using drugs, using the Adolescent Substance Battery [1]. A six-month random sample of 20 percent of adolescents assessed for drug use were targeted for biochemical assay. Compliance for urine delivery was relatively high at 91 percent. Urine samples were quantitatively screened for pharmaceuticals using a standard thin-layer chromatography (TLC) technique [2]. Statistical significance was found in the relationship between gender and marijuana use (p = .05). This study confirms that gender and drug-using behaviors among adolescents need additional research and evaluation.
References
1.
JamesW.MooreD., The Adolescent Substance Battery: Clinical Diagnoses and Student Assistance Program-Case Management for Adolescents Using Drugs, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3:2, pp. 45–57, 1994.
2.
Comprehensive Toxicology Services, Drug Detection Guide, Tacoma, Washington, personal communication, June 18, 1996.
3.
AmaroH.ZuckermanB.CabralH., Drug Use Among Adolescent Mothers: Profile of Risk, Pediatrics, 84:1, pp. 144–151, 1989.
4.
DemboR.WilliamsL.SchmeidlerJ.ChristensenC., Recidivism in a Cohort of Juvenile Detainees: A 31/2-Year Follow-Up, International Journal of the Addictions, 28:7, pp. 631–658, 1993.
5.
FeuchtT.StephensR.WalkerM., Drug Use Among Juvenile Arrestees: A Comparison of Self-Report, Urinalysis and Hair Assay, Journal of Drug Issues, 24, pp. 99–116, 1994.
6.
HallJ.HenggelerS.FeliceM.ReynosoT.WilliamsN.SheetsR., Adolescent Substance Abuse during Pregnancy, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 18:2, pp. 265–271, 1993.
7.
HancockL.HennrikusD.HenryD.Sanson-FisherR., Agreement between Two Measures of Drug Use in a Low-Prevalence Population, Addictive Behaviors, 16, pp. 507–516, 1991.
8.
HuttenbachD., Adolescent Urine Drug Screening, A Cobb County Medical Society Program, Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia, 76:12, pp. 833–837, 1987.
9.
JenksB., Re: Adolescent Urine Drug Screening (letter), Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia, 77:5, p. 285, 1988.
10.
KokotailoP.AdgerH.DugganA.RepkeJ.JoffeA.CigaretteAlcohol, and Other Drug Use by School-Age Pregnant Adolescents: Prevalence, Detection, and Associated Risk Factors, Pediatrics, 90:3, pp. 328–334, 1992.
11.
KokotailoP.LanghoughR.CoxN.DavidsonS.FlemingM., Cigarette, Alcohol and Other Drug Use among Small City Pregnant Adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health, 15:5, pp. 366–373, 1994.
12.
McBrideD.InciardiJ., The Focused Offender Disposition Program: Philosophy, Procedures, and Preliminary Findings, Journal of Drug Issues, 23, pp. 143–160, 1993.
13.
TennantF.ShannonJ., Quantitative Urine Testing: A New Tool in Diagnosis and Beating Cocaine Abuse, Postgraduate Medicine, 86, pp. 107–114, 1989.
14.
TennantF., Quantitative Urine Levels of Abusable Drugs for Clinical Purposes, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 10, pp. 301–308, 1990.
15.
TennantF., Urine Drug Screening on Adolescents on Request of Parents, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3:3, pp. 75–81, 1994.
16.
ThomasF.QuinnQ.KuehlB.NealA., The Strategic Use of Urinalysis in the Treatment of Adolescents in Family Therapy, Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 6, pp. 1–11, 1987.
17.
ValentineJ.KomorskiE., Use of a Visual Panel Detection Method for Drugs of Abuse: Clinical and Laboratory Experience with Children and Adolescents, Journal of Pediatrics, 126:1, pp. 135–140, 1995.
18.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ., National Survey Results on Drug Use from The Monitoring The Future Study, 1975–1995. Volume I, Secondary School Students, The University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. National Institute on Drug Abuse. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. National Institutes of Health, 1996.
19.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1985.
20.
BrockT., Urine Drug Screens in Adolescent Programs, in Adolescent Substance Abuse: Etiology, Treatment, and Prevention, Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 207–218, 1992.
21.
FinkleB., Drug Analysis Technology: Overview and State of the Art, Clinical Chemistry, 33, pp. 13–18, 1987.
22.
SaxonA.CaslynD.HaverV.DelaneyC., Clinical Evaluation and Use of Urine Screening for Drug Abuse, Western Journal of Medicine, 149, pp. 296–303, 1988.
23.
SchwartzR.CohenP.BailG., Identifying and Coping with a Drug-Using Adolescent: Some Guidelines for Pediatricians and Parents, Pediatric Review, 7, pp. 133–139, 1985.
24.
SmithD.GutgesellM.SchwartzR.ThorneM.BogemaS., Federal Guidelines for Marijuana Screening Should Have Lower Cut-Off Levels. A Comparison of Results from Immunoassay and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 113, pp. 1299–1300, 1989.
EriksonE., Identity, Youth, and Crisis, Norton, New York, 1968.
27.
GilliganC., Adolescent Development Reconsidered, in Mapping the Moral Domain, GilliganC.WardJ.TaylorJ.BardigeB. (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.
28.
DawsonD., Gender Differences in the Probability of Alcohol Treatment, Journal of Substance Abuse, 8:2, pp. 211–225, 1996.
29.
BlumeS., Women and Alcohol: A Review, Journal of the American Medical Association, 256, pp. 1467–1470, 1986.
30.
GombergE., Alcoholic Women in Treatment: New Research, Substance Abuse, 12, pp. 6–12, 1991.
31.
ThomB., Sex Differences in Help-Seeking for Alcohol Problems: Entry into Treatment, British Journal of Addiction, 82, pp. 989–997, 1987.
32.
WallenJ., A Comparison of Male and Female Clients in Substance Abuse Treatment, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, pp. 243–248, 1992.
33.
WeisnerC., The Alcohol Treatment-Seeking Process from a Problem Perspective: Responses to Events, British Journal of Addiction, 85, pp. 561–569, 1990.
34.
DemboR.WilliamsL.SchmeidlerJ.GetreuA.BerryE.GenungL.WishE.ChristensenC., Recidivism among High Risk Youths: A 21/2 Year Follow-Up of a Cohort of Juvenile Detainees, International Journal of the Addictions, 26:11, pp. 1197–1221, 1991.
35.
MillsapsC.AzrinR.MittenbergW., Neuropsychological Effects of Chronic Cannabis Use on the Memory and Intelligence of Adolescents, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3:1, pp. 47–55, 1994.
36.
AzrinN.DonohueB.BesalelV.KoganE., Youth Drug Abuse Treatment: A Controlled Outcome Study, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3:3, pp. 1–16, 1994.
37.
KelleherK.RickertV.HardinB.PopeS.FarmerF., Rurality and Gender: Effects of Early Adolescent Alcohol Use, American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146:3, pp. 317–322, 1992.
38.
DeykinE.BukaS.ZeenaT., Depressive Illness Among Chemically Dependent Adolescents, American Journal of Psychiatry, 149:10, pp. 1341–1347, 1992.
39.
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV), Washington, D.C., 1994.
40.
DownsW., Using Panel Data to Examine Sex Differences in Causal Relationships Among Adolescent Use, Norms, and Peer Alcohol Use, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14:6, pp. 469–486, 1985.
41.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ., Drug Use Among American High School Seniors, College Students, and Young Adults, 1975–1990: High School Seniors, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 91-1813, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1991.
42.
JamesW.LonzakH., The Role of Denial and Defensiveness in Adolescent Substance Use, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 5:2, pp. 17–41, 1996.
