The aims of the study were to describe the health of older men and women and to investigate the social patterning of health and functional disability among older men and women, with special reference to social class differences. The data were derived from the 1994 nationwide Finnish Survey on Living Conditions (N = 1,448). Functional disability, limiting long-standing illness, and self-assessed health were used as health measures. Sociodemographic measures were social class, marital status, and urbanization. The age-adjusted social class differences were clear. Farmers and workers reported more functional disability and poorer health than did the white-collar class. Differences were somewhat smaller among women than among men. Social class was a stronger determinant than urbanization and marital status of functional disability and health.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Statistics Finland.Statistical Yearbook of Finland 1995. Helsinki, 1995.
2.
ArberS., and GinnJ.Gender and later life. Soc. Sci. Med.36: 33–46, 1993.
3.
SidellM.Health in Old Age—Myth, Mystery and Management. Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1995.
4.
VictorC. R.Continuity or change: Inequalities in health in later life. Ageing Soc.11: 23–39, 1991.
5.
VictorC.Health inequality in later life: Age, gender or class? In Readings for a New Public Health, edited by MartinC. J. and McQueenD. V.. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1989.
6.
ArberS., and GinnJ.Gender and Later Life: A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. Sage, London, 1991.
7.
ThorslundM., and LundbergO.Health and inequalities among the oldest old. J. Aging Health6: 51–69, 1994.
8.
DahlE., and BirkelundG. E.Health inequalities in later life in a socialdemocratic welfare state. Soc. Sci. Med.44: 871–881, 1997.
9.
PhillipsonC.Capitalism and the Construction of Old Age. Macmillan, London, 1982.
10.
ArberS.Chronic illness over the life course: Class inequalities among men and women in Britain. In Medical Sociology: Research on Chronic Illness, edited by AbelT.Informationszentrum Socialwissenschaften, Bonn/Berlin, 1993.
11.
TownsendP.DavidsonN., and WhiteheadM.Inequalities in Health. Penguin, Harmondsworth, England, 1988.
12.
LahelmaE., and RahkonenO. (eds.). Health inequalities in modern societies and beyond [special issue]. Soc. Sci. Med.44: 721–910, 1997.
13.
MartelinT.Mortality by indicators of socioeconomic status among the Finnish elderly. Soc. Sci. Med.38: 1257–1278, 1994.
14.
VerbruggeL. M.Longer life but worsening health? Trends in health and mortality of middle-aged and older persons. Milbank Mem. Fund Q.62: 475–519, 1984.
15.
BlaxterM.Health and Lifestyle. Routledge, London, 1990.
16.
AlestaloM.Structural Change, Classes, and the State: Finland in an Historical and Comparative Perspective. Research Reports 33. Research Group for Comparative Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 1986.
17.
KaristoA.Class and health: The development of the class pattern of morbidity in Finland 1964–1987. In Welfare Trends in the Scandinavian Countries, edited by HansenE. J.M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 1993.
18.
MacIntyreS.The effect of family position and status on health. Soc. Sci. Med.35: 453–464, 1992.
19.
GoldmanN.KorenmanS., and WeinsteinR.Marital status and health among the elderly. Soc. Sci. Med.40: 1717–1730, 1995.
20.
GlicksmanM. D.Social support, marital status and living arrangement correlates of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the elderly. Soc. Sci. Med.40: 811–814, 1995.
21.
GoveW. R.Sex, marital status and mortality. Am. J. Sociol. 79: 45–67, 1973.
22.
HuY., and GoldmanN.Mortality differentials by marital status: An international comparison. Demography27: 223, 1990.
23.
BerkmanL. F., and SymeS. L.Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda county residents. Am. J. Epidemiol. 109: 186–204, 1979.
24.
Statistics Finland.Elinolot numeroina 1994. Living Conditions 1996: 1. Helsinki, 1996.
25.
BlaxterM.A comparison of measures of inequality in morbidity. In Health Inequalities in European Countries, edited by FoxA. J.. Gower, Aldershot, England, 1989.
26.
RahkonenO.Social class, gender and illness—A Nordic experience. In Demography, Economy and Welfare, edited by LundhC.. Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden, 1995.
27.
JudgeT., and BenzevalM.Limiting Long-standing Illness and the 1991 Census: Implications for Health Planning in the 1990s. King's Fund, London, 1990.
28.
JylhäM.The Tampere Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Description of the study: Basic results on health and functional ability. Scand. J. Soc. Med.47(Suppl.): 1–58, 1992.
29.
SegoviaJ.BartlettR. F., and EdwardsA. C.An empirical analysis of dimensions of health status measures. Soc. Sci. Med.29: 761–768, 1989.
30.
MosseyJ. M., and ShapiroE.Self-rated health: A predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am. J. Public Health72: 800–808, 1982.
31.
ShapiroE., and TateR.Who really is at risk of institutionalization?Gerontologist28: 237–245, 1988.
32.
BowlingA.Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurements Scales. Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1991.
33.
WachtelT. J.FultonJ. P., and GoldfarbJ.Early prediction of discharge disposition after hospitalization. Gerontologist27: 98–103, 1987.
34.
ArberS.Class, paid employment and family roles: Making sense of structural disadvantage, gender and health status. Soc. Sci. Med.32: 425–436, 1991.
35.
ParkerM. G.ThorslundM., and LundbergO.Physical function and social class among Swedish oldest old. J. Gerontol. Soc. Sci.49: 196–201, 1994.
