Based on the guiding principles of the symbolic interactions theory, the authors used symbolic interaction theory to understand the views and meanings attached to welfare, poverty, and poor families, as well as to decipher grandmothers' policy recommendations. The culturally variant perspective provided a conceptual lens that placed grandmothers' adaptive behaviors in a historical, socio-political context. Using Grounded Theory Methods, the authors analyzed 20 personal interviews from a larger multiple-case study that examines the influence of TANF on grandparent-led families in southwest Virginia. Grandparents' views create a continuum of beliefs toward poverty, TANF, and personal responsibility with themes of individualistic, structural, and fatalistic views. They made distinct policy recommendations to remove the penalties attached to kinship care. Kinship care continues to be an adaptive family feature, but Black grandmothers' maintain some of the same societal and familial values as the larger society.
References
1.
AbramovitzM. (1996). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. (Rev. ed.). Boston, MA: South End Press.
2.
Administration for Children and Families. (2005, March 8). Welcome to the office of family assistance. Retrieved from http://www.act.dhhs.gov/programs/ofa/.
AllenW. (1978). The search for applicable theories of Black family life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 117–129.
5.
BaileyK. D. (1978). Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press.
6.
BaneM. J., & EllwoodD. T. (1994). Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BanksS. P.LouieE., & EinersonM. (2000). Constructing personal identities in holiday letters. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 299–327.
8.
BurtonL. (1992). Black grandparents rearing children of drug-addicted parents: Stressors, outcomes, and social needs. The Gerontologist, 32, 744–751.
9.
BurtonL. M. (1996). Age, norms, the timing of family transitions, and intergenerational caregiving among aging African American women. The Gerontologist, 36, 199–208.
10.
Center for the Study of Policy Attitudes. (1994). Fighting poverty in America: A study of American public attitudes. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
CoxC. B. (2000). Why grandchildren are going to and staying at grandmother's house and what happens when they get there? In CoxC. B. (Ed.), To grandmother's house we go and stay: Perspective on custodial grandparents (pp. 1–19). New York: Springer.
12.
DavidsonC. E. (1994). Dependent children and their families: A historical survey of United States policies. In JacobsF. H. & DaviesM. W. (Eds.), More than kissing babies: Current child and family policy in the United States (pp. 65–89). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
13.
EdinK., & LienL. (1997). Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
FranklinJ. H. (1988). A historical note on Black families. In McAdooH. P. (Ed.), Black families (2nd ed.; pp. 23–26). Newburg, CA: Sage.
15.
Generations United. (2002). Fact Sheet—Grandparents and other relatives raising children: Challenges of caring for the second family. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
GordonL. (1994). Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare 1890–1935. New York: The Free Press.
17.
GutmanH. G. (1976). From slavery to freedom: 1750–1925. New York: Vintage Press.
18.
Harvard Law Review. (1999). The policy of penalty in kinship care. Retrieved December 11, 2002, from http://www.lexis-nexis.com
19.
HendersonT. L., & StevensM. (2003). Grandparents raising grandchildren: Rights and responsibilities (Publication No. 350–255). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech.
20.
HillR. (1971). The strengths of Black families. New York: Emerson.
21.
HillR. (1999). The strengths of Black families: Twenty-five years later. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
22.
HunterA. G., & TaylorR. J. (1998). Grandparenthood in African American families. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook of grandparenthood (pp. 70–86). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
23.
JendrekM. P. (1994). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Circumstances and decisions. The Gerontologist, 34, 206–216.
24.
KargerH. J., & StoeszD. (2002). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
KleinD., & WhiteJ. (1996). The symbolic interaction framework. In KleinD. & WhiteJ. (Eds.), Family theories (pp. 87–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LaRossaR., & ReitzesD. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In. BossP.DohertyW.LaRossaR.SchummW. & SteinmetzS. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum Press.
27.
MalveauxJ. (1995, February). The GOP's war against poor women. Black Enterprise, 25, 32.
28.
MinklerM., & RoeK. M. (1996). Grandparents as surrogate parents. Generations, 20, 34–38.
29.
MintzS. (1992). Children, families, and the state: American family law in historical perspective. Denver University Law Review, 69, 635–661.
30.
MonroeP. A., & TillerV. V. (2001). Commitment to work among welfare-reliant women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 816–828.
31.
MoynihanP. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.
32.
MullenF. (2000a). Grandparents and welfare reform. In CoxC. B. (Ed.), To grandmother's house we go and stay: Perspectives on custodial grandparents (pp. 113–131). New York: Springer.
33.
MullenF. (2000b). Why grandchildren are going to and staying at grandmother's house and what happens when they get there. In CoxC. B. (Ed.), To grandmother's house we go and stay: Perspectives on custodial grandparents (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.
34.
MullenF., & EinhornM. (2000). The effects of state TANF choices on grandparent-headed households. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons (AARP).
35.
Perry-JenkinsM.RepettiR. L., & CrouterA. C. (2001). Work and family in the 1990s. In MilardoR. (Ed.), Understanding families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 200–217). Minneapolis, MN: National Council of Family Relations.
36.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA/96). (1996). (Pub. L. No. 104–193, codified in part at 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq).
37.
RankM. R. (1994). A view from the inside out: Recipients' perceptions of welfare. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 21, 27–47.
38.
RobertsD. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
39.
ScarcellaC. A.EhrleJ., & GreenR. (2003). Identifying and addressing the needs of children in grandparent care (Document No. B-55 in Series, New Federalism: National Survey of American Families). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
40.
SeccombeK. (1999). So you think I drive a Cadillac? Welfare recipients' perspective on the system and its reform. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
41.
SinghB.WilliamsJ., & SinghB. (1998). An examination of extended family residence sharing predispositions in the United States: 1973–1989. Marriage and the Family Review, 27, 131–143.
42.
StackC. B., & BurtonL. M. (1993). Kinscripts. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24, 157–170.
43.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
SudarkasaN. (1988). Interpreting the African heritage in Afro-American family organization. In McAddoH. P. (Ed.), Black families (2nd ed.; pp. 27–43). Newburg, CA: Sage.
45.
ThomasJ. L.SperryL., & YarbroughM. S. (2000). Grandparents as parents: Research findings and policy recommendations. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 31, 3–22.
46.
ThomsonE. F.MinklerM., & DriverD. (2000). A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States. In CoxC. B. (Ed.), To grandmother's house we go and stay: Perspective on custodial grandparents (pp. 20–33). New York: Springer.
47.
TurnerW. L., & AlstonR. J. (1994). The role of the family in psychological adaptation to physical disabilities for African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association, 86, 915–921.
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000, September). The Black population in the United States (Document No. P20–530). Washington, DC: Author.
49.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003, October). Grandparents living with grandchildren: 2000 (Report Number C2KBR-31) Washington, DC: Author.
50.
U.S. Congress, House Committee on Ways and Means. (1998, May). Overview of Entitlement program: 1998 green book (p. 419). Washington, DC: 105th Congress, 2d session.
51.
WeaverR. K.ShapiroR. Y., & JacobsL. R. (1995). The polls—Trends welfare. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 606–627.
