This paper discusses a use of technology in which the student controls the computer (e.g., computer programming) instead of it controlling the student (e.g., drill-and-practice). A description of the nature of this mode of computer use is provided, and some examples are given.
A rationale for learner control is discussed in terms of cognitive and affective outcomes of computing. The cognitive outcomes include relatively specific learning and thinking skills and more general systematic methods of problem solving. Affective outcomes include self-confidence, curiosity and exploratory behaviors, and motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EissA. F. and HarbeckM. B., Behavioral Objectives in the Affective Domain. Washington, D.C.: National Science Supervisors Association, Division of the National Science Teachers Association, 1969.
2.
TofflerA., Future Shock. New York: Random House, 1970.
3.
MilnerS., The Effects of Computer Programming on Performance in Mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La., February 1973.
4.
FeurzeigW.PapertS.BloomM.GrantR., and SolomonS., Programming Languages as a Conceptual Framework for Teaching Mathematics. Project Report No. 1889. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.
5.
PapertS., Teaching Children Thinking. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, LOGO Memo No. 2, 1971.
6.
DwyerT., “Heuristic Strategies for Using Computers to Enrich Education,”International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1974, 6, 136–154.
7.
PapertS., “Teaching Children to be Mathematicians vs. Teaching About Mathematics,”International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1972, 3, 249–262.
8.
PolyaG., How to Solve It (Second Edition). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.
