Feminist scholarship has shown that the welfare state is not only a set of agencies and policies to distribute services, but is engaged in the promotion of normative concepts of the female through its structural arrangements and the content of its programs and policies. Yet, this scholarship conceptualizes the state as a national entity and free from external influences, ignoring its transnational dimension. States are embedded in an international network consisting of other states, international agencies, and corporations that influence the practices and discursive frame of the welfare state. To uncover the process by which the welfare state institutionalizes and promotes female identities and the transnational dimension of this process, the author analyzes the case of community health worker programs conducted by the Mexican state from the 1970s to the early 1990s. The analysis corroborates the gender practices of the welfare state and suggests a reconceptualization that takes into account the transnational dimension of the state practices. The implications for feminist theories on the welfare state and for analyses of health promotion policies and programs are discussed.
References
1.
DaykinN.NaidooJ.Feminist critiques of health promotion. In The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analyses of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk, edited by BuntonR.NettletonS., pp. 60–69. Routledge, London, 1995.
2.
FinchJ.GrovesD.A Labour of Love. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1983.
3.
WilsonE.Feminism and social policy. In Social Policy and Social Welfare, edited by LoneyM.BoswellD.ClerkeJ., pp. 33–45. Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1983.
4.
DotyR. L.Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1996.
5.
GuptaA.Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. Am. Ethnol.22: 375–402, 1995.
6.
MohantyC.Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Rev. 30: 61–88, 1988.
7.
ScottJ.Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. Am. Hist. Rev.91: 1067–1070, 1986.
8.
de LauretisT.Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1987.
9.
SawickiJ.Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power, and the Body. Routledge, New York, 1991.
10.
AnnandaleE.ClarkJ.What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction. Sociol. Health Illness18: 17–44, 1996.
11.
BourqueS.Gender and the state: Perspectives from Latin America. In Women, the State, and Development, edited by CharltonS.EverettJ.StaudtK., pp. 114–129. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1989.
12.
CharltonS.EverettJ.StaudtK. (eds.). Women, the State, and Development. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1989.
13.
FraserN.Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1989.
14.
RadcliffeS.People have to rise up—like the great women fighters: The state and the peasant women in Peru. In Viva: Women and Popular Protest in Latin America, edited by RadcliffeS.WestwoodS., pp. 197–218. Routledge, London, 1993.
MorantzR.Making women modern: Middle class women and health reform in 19th century America. Soc. Hist.10: 490–507, 1977.
18.
JensonJ.Gender and reproduction: Or babies and the state. Stud. Polit. Econ.20: 187–213, 1986.
19.
ChuchrykP.From dictatorship to democracy: The women's movement in Chile. In The Women's Movements in Latin America: Participation and Democracy, Ed. 2, edited by JaquetteJ., pp. 65–108. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., 1994.
20.
FrenchW.Prostitutes and guardian angels: Women, work and the family in Porfiriato Mexico. Hispanic Am. Hist. Rev.72: 529–553, 1992.
21.
GuyD.Sex and Danger in Buenos Aires: Prostitution, Family, and Nation in Argentina. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1991.
22.
McGeeD. S.Gender and sociopolitical change in twentieth-century Latin America. Hispanic Am. Hist. Rev.71: 259–304, 1991.
23.
FrancoJ.Plotting Women: Gender and Representation in Mexico. Columbia University Press, New York, 1989.
24.
VaughanM.Women, class, and education in Mexico 1880–1928. In Modern Mexico: State, Economy, and Social Conflict, edited by HamiltonN.HardingT. F., pp. 43–66. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1986.
25.
HallidayF.Hidden from international relations: Women and the international arena. Millennium. J. Int. Stud.17: 419–428, 1988.
26.
HannerzU.Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. Routledge, New York, 1996.
27.
MorganL. M.Community Participation in Health: The Politics of Primary Care in Costa Rica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993.
28.
RamirezF.SoysalY.The changing logic of political citizenship: Cross- national acquisition of women's suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990. Am. Sociol. Rev.62: 735–745, 1997.
29.
EscobarA.Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1995.
30.
BermanP.GwatkinD.BurgerS.Community-based health workers: Head start or false start toward health for all. Soc. Sci. Med.25: 443–459, 1987.
31.
Centers for Disease Control. Community Health Advisors: Models, Research, and Practice, Selected Annotations—United States, Vols. I and II. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga., 1994.
32.
EngE.ParkerE.HarlanC.Lay health advisor intervention strategies: A continuum from natural helping to paraprofessional helping. Health Educ. Behav.24: 413–417, 1997.
33.
Ofosu-AmaahV.National Experiences in the Use of Community Health Workers: A Review of Current Issues and Problems. Offset Publication No. 71. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1983.
34.
Pan American Health Organization. Community Participation in Health and Development in the Americas: An Analysis of Selected Case Studies. Scientific Publication No. 473. Washington, D.C., 1984.
35.
WernerD.The village health worker: Lackey or liberator?World Health Forum2: 46–68, 1981.
36.
FoucaultM.The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vintage Books, New York, 1990.
37.
ProcacciG.Social economy and the government of poverty. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP., pp. 151–168. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991.
38.
La BergeA. F.Mission and Method: The Early Nineteenth-Century French Public Health Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992.
39.
RosenG.A History of Public Health: Expanded Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1993.
40.
Davin, A. Imperialism and motherhood. Hist. Workshop5: 9–65, 1978.
41.
KlausA.Women's organizations and the infant health movement in France and the United States, 1890–1920. In Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy and Power, edited by McCarthyK. D., pp. 157–173. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1990.
42.
HegemannK.Rationalizing family work: Municipal family welfare and urban mothers of Germany. Soc. Polit.40: 19–47, 1997.
43.
RossE.Good and bad mothers: Lady philanthropists and London housewives before the First World War. In Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy and Power, edited by McCarthyK. D., pp. 174–198. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1990.
44.
SymondsA.Angels and interfering busybodies: The social construction of two occupations. Sociol. Health Illness13: 249–264, 1991.
45.
DingwallR.The Social Organization of Health Visitor Training. Croom Helm, London, 1977.
46.
EhrenreichB.EnglishD.For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women. Anchor Books, New York, 1989.
47.
FeeE.PorterD.Public health, preventive medicine and professionalization: England and America in the nineteenth century. In Medicine in Society: Historical Essays, edited by WearA., pp. 249–276. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992.
48.
KaminerW.Women Volunteering: The Pleasure, Pain, and Politics of Unpaid Work for 1830 to the Present. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., 1984.
49.
SkocpolT.Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
50.
BrownR. E.Public health in imperialism: Early Rockefeller programs at home and abroad. Am. J. Public Health66: 897–903, 1976.
51.
SachsW.The archeology of the development idea. The Ecologist20: 42–43, 1990.
52.
American Public Health Association. The State of the Art of Delivering Low Cost Health Services in Developing Countries: A Summary Study of 180 Health Projects. International Health Programs, Washington, D.C., 1977.
53.
UgaldeA.Ideological dimensions of community participation in Latin America health programs. Soc. Sci. Med.21: 41–53, 1985.
54.
HartmannB.Population control I: Birth of an ideology. Int. J. Health Serv. 27: 523–540, 1997.
55.
WaltG. (ed.). Community Health Workers in National Programmes: Just Another Pair of Hands?Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1990.
56.
World Health Organization and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. Alma-Alta Declaration 1978. Primary Health Care. WHO, Geneva, 1978.
57.
HeggenhougenH. K.Community Health Workers: The Tanzanian Experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
58.
WernerD.Health care and human dignity: A subjective look at community-based rural health programs in Latin America. Contact3: 91–105, 1980.
59.
FendallN. R.Auxiliaries in Health Care: Programmes in Developing Countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1972.
60.
RogersE. M.SolomonD.Traditional Midwives as Family Planning Communicators in Asia. Case study No. 1. East-West Communication Institute, Honolulu, 1975.
61.
SidelV.SidelR.The health care delivery system of the People's Republic of China. In Health by the People, edited by NewellK., pp. 1–12. WHO, Geneva, 1975.
62.
BeherhorstC.The Chimaltenango development project in Guatemala. In Health by the People, edited by NewellK., pp. 30–52. WHO, Geneva, 1975.
63.
MangelsdorfK. R.The selection and training of primary health care workers in Ecuador: Issues and alternatives for public policy. Int. J. Health Serv. 18: 471–487, 1988.
64.
MinklerM.CoxK.Creating critical consciousness in health: Applications of Freire's philosophy and methods to the health care setting. Int. J. Health Serv. 10: 311–321, 1980.
65.
AnnelM. V.A Guatemalan experience: The community, not the doctor, in control. World Health Forum3: 282–284, 1982.
66.
JobertB.Populism and health policy: The case of community health volunteers in India. Soc. Sci. Med.20: 1–28, 1985.
67.
SwiderS.McElmuryB.A women's health perspective in primary health care: A nursing and community health worker demonstration project in urban America. Fam. Community Health13: 1–17, 1990.
68.
AroleM.AroleR.A comprehensive rural health project in Jamkhed (India). In Health by the People, edited by NewellK., pp. 70–90. WHO, Geneva, 1975.
69.
ByrdT.Project verdad: A community development approach to health. Hygiene11: 15–19, 1992.
70.
StormsD.Training and Working with Auxiliary Health Workers: Lessons from Developing Countries. International Health Programs Monograph, Series No. 3. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1982.
71.
SalberE.Where does primary health care begin? The health facilitator as a central figure in primary care. Isr. J. Med. Sci.17: 110–111, 1981.
72.
American Public Health Association. Primary Health Care Progress and Problems: An Analysis of 52 AID-Assisted Projects. International Health Programs, Washington, D.C., 1982.
73.
FrankelS.Overview. In The Community Health Worker: Effective Programs for Developing Countries, edited by FrankelS., pp. 1–61. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
74.
Ramirez-VallesJ.Women Community Health Workers: A Case Study of Feminine Identities and Health Education in a Northern Mexican City. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1997.
75.
FujigakiL. A.Los Programas de bienestar rural en Mexico. In La Atencion Medica Rural en Mexico: 1930–1980, edited by LlamasH. Hernandez, pp. 253–268. IMSS, Mexico, 1984.
76.
BustamanteM. E.Hechos sobresalientes en la historia de la secretaria de salubridad y asistencia. Salud Publica Mexico25: 465–482, 1983.
77.
United Nations. Case Studies in Population Policy: Mexico. Population Policy Paper, No. 21. New York, 1989.
78.
AlbaF.PotterJ. E.Population and development in Mexico since 1940: An interpretation. Popul. Dev. Rev.12: 47–75, 1986.
79.
TurnerF.Responsible Parenthood: The Politics of Mexico's New Population Policies. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., 1974.
80.
Presidencia de la Republica. Plan Nacional de Salud. Mexico, 1984.
81.
Objetivos y estrategias del sector salud para alcanzar los minimos de salud para todos en el ano 2000. Document presented by the Mexican delegation to the XXVII Reunion del Consejo Directivo de la Organizacion Panamericana de Salud. Salud Publica Mexico23: 49–63, 1981.
82.
SentiesY. E.Higiene materno-infantil: Adiestramiento de parteras empiricas. In I Reunion Nacional de Salud y Enfermedad en el Medio Rural de Mexico, edited by PachecoC. R.FujigakiA., pp. 339–346. SSA, Mexico, 1991.
83.
PinedaC.La participacion de la partera empirica en los programs de salud. Higiene25: 165–172, 1975.
84.
AlarconN. F.BravoB. H.PurielM. A.El medio rural mexicano y los servicios de salud. In Planificacion Familiar, Poblacion y Salud en Mexico Rural, edited by MartinezJ., pp. 35–50. IMSS, Mexico, 1986.
85.
CorreuA.GarciaS. F.CabelloG. J.Los servicios de planificacion familiar en el medio rural. In Planificacion Familiar, Poblacion y Salud en Mexico Rural, edited by MartinezJ., pp. 53–96. IMSS, Mexico, 1986.
86.
de LeneroM. EluDe lo Institucional a lo Comunitario: Un Programa de Salud Rural. Asociacion Mexicana de Poblacion, Mexico, 1982.
87.
Secretaria de Salud. Projecto de Actividades Basicas para Ejecutar el Plan Quinquenal de Trabajo 1972–1976. Dir. de Educacion Higienica, Mexico, n.d.
88.
Secretaria de Salud. 1977–1979 Pensamiento Rector. SSA, Mexico, n.d.
89.
GalindoC.PoindexterD.Using soap operas to promote family planning. Populi13: 30–38, 1986.
90.
NarimanH.Soap Operas for Social Change: Toward a Methodology for Entertainment-Education Television. Praeger, Westport, Conn., 1993.
91.
MartinezM. J.Impacto Social del Programa de Salud Rural “Menos y Mejores.”IMSS and the Academia Mexicana de Investigacion en Demografia, Mexico, 1988.
92.
IMSS-COPLAMAR. Boletin Informativo2, 1984.
93.
StebbinsK. R.Constraints on successful public health programs: A view from a Mexican community. In Health and Health Care in Developing Countries: Sociological Perspectives, edited by ConradP.GallagherE. B., pp. 211–227. Temple University Press, Philadelpha, 1993.
94.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social–COPLAMAR. Esquema del Curso Para Capacitacion de los Promotores Sociales Voluntarios Rurales del IMSS. Mexico, 1984.
95.
MartinezM. G.La participacion comunitaria en los programas de salud del IMSS. Higiene38: 19–21, 1988.
96.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social–COPLAMAR. Evaluacion de la Participacion Comunitaria en el Programa IMSS-COPLAMAR. Mexico, 1986.
97.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Programa Nacional de Integracion de la Mujer al Desarrollo: Acciones en Zonas Populares, Evaluacion de Resultados Primera Etapa, Junio-Diciembre 1984. Mexico, 1985.
98.
CastroP. R.HernandezT. I.Participacion Comunitaria y Planificacion Familiar. Perspectivas en Salud Publica, No. 15. Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 1992.
99.
Secretaria de Salud. Programa de Mejoramiento de los Servicios de Salud Mexico-BID: Promocion de la Participacion Comunitaria. SSA, Mexico, 1988.
100.
Secretaria de Salud. Puedo Dar Salud: Madres y Procuradoras de Salud: Experiencia en Mexico. Dir. General de Salud Materno Infantil and UNICEF, Mexico, 1991.
101.
Consejo Consultivo del Programa Nacional de Solidaridad. El Programa Nacional de Solidaridad. Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico, 1994.
102.
CorneliusA. W.CraigL. A.FoxJ.Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. Center for US-Mexican Studies, San Diego, Calif., 1994.
103.
Velazquez-DiazG.Organizacion y funcionamiento de los servicios de salud del programa IMSS-Solidaridad. Salud Publica Mexico34: 644–652, 1992.
104.
MolinaC. L.La participacion de la mujer en el programa IMSS-Solidaridad. IMSS-Solidaridad Boletin Informativo8: 4–5, 1990.
105.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social–Solidaridad. Cuaderno de Trabajo del Promotor Social Voluntario Rural. Mexico, 1994.
106.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Guia Para la Formacion de los Promotores Sociales Voluntarios del Programa IMSS-Solidaridad. IMSS-Solidaridad, Mexico, 1991.
107.
ChanJ. ChanLa participacion del promotor social en el programa materno infantil. IMSS-Solidaridad Boletin Informativo8: 5–6, 1990.
108.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social–Solidaridad. Testimonios de Solidaridad. Mexico, 1993.
109.
SentiesY. E., Participacion Comunitaria en la Atencion Primaria a la Salud, Teoria y Praxis: Modelo de Estrategia Exitosa “La Salud Empieza en Casa.”SSA and UNICEF, Mexico, 1994.
110.
ArandaB. J.Politicas publicas y mujeres campesinas en Mexico. In Mujeres y Relaciones de Genero en la Antropologia Latinoamericana, coordinated by GonzalezS., pp. 171–222. El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico, 1993.
111.
LevinL. S.IdlerE. L.The Hidden Health Care System: Mediating Structures and Medicine. Ballinger, Cambridge, England, 1981.
112.
LevineS.Dolor y Alegria: Women and Social Change in Urban Mexico. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1993.
113.
AlatorreR.LangerA.LozanoR.Mujer y salud. In Las Mujeres en la Pobreza, edited by Grupo Interdisciplinario Sobre Mujer, Trabajo y Pobreza, pp. 217–242. El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico, 1994.
114.
PasaraL.ZarzarA.Ambiguedades, contradicciones e incertidumbres. In La Otra Cara de la Luna: Nuevos Actores Sociales en el Peru, edited by PasarL., pp. 174–203. Manatial, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1991.
115.
HartmannB.Population control II: The population establishment today. Int. J. Health Serv. 27: 541–557, 1997.
116.
TalamanteD. C.PerezG. CareagaParada-AmpudiaL.Es la cooperacion para las mujeres? In Las Mujeres en la Pobreza, edited by Grupo Interdisciplinario Sobre Mujer, Trabajo y Pobreza, pp. 325–343. El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico, 1994.
117.
HaneyL.Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. Am. Sociol. Rev.61: 759–778, 1996.
