Middle School Students' Perceptions,Persistence,and Performance in Mathematical Problem Solving

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore middle school students' (N = 54) perceptions of problem difficulty, persistence, and knowledge and use of problem-solving strategies in solving mathematical word problems. Students identified as learning disabled, average achieving, or gifted were tested individually as they solved six word problems classified as 1-, 2-, or 3-step problems. After the examiner read each problem, the student rated the problem's difficulty on a 1-to-6 scale (very easy to very hard) and then solved the problem. Results indicated that students with learning disabilities rated problems as significantly more difficult and had a significantly lower total word problem score than both average and gifted students. In comparison, average students rated problems as significantly more difficult than gifted students but did not differ significantly on total word problem score. There was no significant difference between students with learning disabilities and average achievers in the length of time they spent solving problems, but both groups took significantly longer than the gifted students. Students with learning disabilities used significantly fewer problem-solving strategies on the two- and three-step problems than both the average and the gifted students, who did not differ. Findings suggest that although students with learning disabilities perceive problems as more difficult than do their more successful peers, they do not spend more time solving problems. Even with greater persistence, however, they would still be at a serious disadvantage compared with better problem solvers because they seem to lack important problem-solving strategies for effective and efficient mathematical problem solving.

References

Berk

I.E.

(1997). Child development (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Ericcson

K.A.

Simon

H.A.

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

Flavell

J.H.

Miller

P.H.

Miller

S.A.

(1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Garner

Alexander

P.A.

(1989). Metcognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

Grimes

(1981). Learned helplessness and attribution theory: Redefining children's learning problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 88–99.

Heath

(1996). The emotional domain: Self-concept and depression in children with learning disabilities. In Scruggs

T.E.

Mastropieri

M.A.

(Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part A, pp. 47–76). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Heller

Hungate

(1985). Implications for mathematics instruction of research in mathematical thinking. In Silver

E.A.

(Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 83–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hutchinson

(1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34–63.

Janvier

(1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Kaufman

A.S.

(1976). A four-test short form of the WISC-R. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 180–196.

11.

Kazdin

A.E.

(1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Mayer

R.E.

(1985). Mathematical ability. In Sternberg

R.J.

(Ed.), Human abilities: Information processing approach (pp. 127–150). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

13.

Meichenbaum

(1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.

14.

Meltzer

L.J.

Roditi

Houser

R.F.

Perlman

(1998). Perceptions of academic strategies and competence in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 437–451.

15.

Montague

(1991). Gifted and gifted-learning disabled students' knowledge of mathematical problem solving. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 393–411.

16.

Montague

(1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248.

17.

Montague

(1997a). Cognitive strategy training in mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164–177.

18.

Montague

(1997b). Student perceptions, mathematical problem solving, and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 21–30.

19.

Montague

Applegate

(1993a). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 175–201.

20.

Montague

Applegate

(1993b). Middle school students' mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 19–32.

21.

Montague

Applegate

(1996, April). Cognition, perceptions, and mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

22.

Montague

Applegate

Marquard

(1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 223–232.

23.

Montague

Marquard

LeBlanc

(1993, April). Affective and cognitive processes of middle school students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

24.

Silver

E.A.

(1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some underrepresented themes and needed directions. In Silver

E.A.

(Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 247–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

25.

Sternberg

R.J.

(1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Swanson

H.L.

(1990). Instruction derived from the strategy deficit model: Overview of principles and procedures. In Scruggs

T.E.

Wong

B.Y.L.

(Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 34–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.

27.

Swanson

H.L.

Carson

Sachse-Lee

C.M.

(1996). A selective synthesis of intervention research for students with learning disabilities: Is there a general support for a strategy deficit model. In Scruggs

T.E.

Mastropieri

M.A.

(Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part A, pp. 51–180). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

28.

Swanson

H.L.

O'Shaughnessy

T.E.

McMahon

C.M.

Hoskyn

Sachse-Lee

C.M.

(1998). In Scruggs

T.E.

Mastropieri

M.A.

(Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 12, pp. 1–42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

29.

Wechsler

(1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

30.

Whimbey

(1990). Thinking through math word problems: Strategies for intermediate elementary school students, teacher's manual. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

31.

Woodcock

Johnson

(1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Boston: Teaching Corp.

32.

Zawaiza

Gerber

(1993). Effects of explicit instruction on math word problem solving by community college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 64–79.