This study investigated the effect of the disability labels learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) on public school general education and special education teachers' willingness to refer students to gifted programs. Results indicated that teachers were significantly influenced by the LD and EBD labels when making referrals to gifted programs. Both groups of teachers were much less willing to refer students with disability labels to gifted programs than identically described students with no disability label. Additionally, when compared to general education teachers, special education teachers were less likely to refer a gifted student, with or without disabilities, to a gifted program.
References
1.
AlgozzineB.SutherlandJ. (1977). The “learning disabilities” label: An experimental analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 292–297.
2.
BaldwinA.Y. (1999). Learning disability: The mysterious mask - The USA perspective. In BaldwinA.Y.VialleW. (Eds.), The many faces of giftedness (pp. 103–134). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.)
3.
BaumS. (1990). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox. ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted ChildrenReston: VA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED321484). Retrieved January 20, 2001, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed321484.html
4.
BaumS.CooperC.R.NeuT. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38 (5), 477–490.
5.
BaumS.EmerickL.J.HermanG.N.DixonJ. (1989). Identification, programs and enrichment strategies for gifted learning disabled youth. Roeper Review, 12 (1), 48–53.
6.
BaumS.M.OwenS.V.DixonJ. (1991). To be gifted & learning disabled. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
BeilkeJ.R.YsselN. (1999). The chilly climate for students with disabilities in higher education. College Student Journal33 (3), 364–71.
9.
BrodyL.E.MillsD.J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30 (3), 282–286.
10.
BusseT.V.DahmeG.WagnerH.WieczerkowskiW. (1986). Factors underlying highly gifted students: A cross-cultural study. Education and Psychological Measurement, 46, 903–915.
11.
ClarkB. (1997). Growing up gifted (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
ClineS.HedgemanK. (2001). Gifted children with disabilities. Gifted Child Today, 24 (3), 16–24.
13.
ColemanL.J.CrossT.L. (2001). Being gifted in school. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
14.
ColemanM.R.GallagherJ.J.FosterA. (1994). Updated report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
15.
Colorado Department of Education. (in press).Gifted students with disabilities: Twice exceptional resource book. Denver: Author.
DavisG.A.RimmS.B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
DavisG.A.RimmS.B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
DunnL. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded - Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
20.
EllisE. (1997). Watering up the curriculum for adolescents with learning disabilities: Goals for the knowledge dimension. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 326–346.
21.
Florida Department of Education. (2001). Florida statutes and state board of education rules. Tallahassee: Author.
22.
FosterG.YsseldykeJ. (1976). Expectancy and halo effects as a result of artificially induced teacher bias. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 37–45.
23.
FriedrichsT. (2001). Distinguishing characteristics of gifted students with disabilities. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
24.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
25.
GearG.H. (1978). Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22 (1), 90–7.
26.
JohnsonL.J.KarnesM.B.CarrV. W. (1997). Providing services to children with gifts and disabilities: A critical need. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 516–527). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
27.
KarnesF.A.ShaunessyA.B.BislandA. (2004). Gifted students with disabilities are we finding them?Gifted Child Today, 27 (4), 16–22.
28.
KloostermanV.SurannaK. (2003). Gifted and talented females: The struggle for recognition. In CastellanoJ.A. (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education (pp. 97–112). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.)
29.
MillerM.Terry-GodtP.R., (1996). The handicapped gifted. In Jenkins-FriedmanR.RichertE.S.FeldhusenJ.F. (Eds.), Special populations of gifted learner (pp. 85–91). National Association of Gifted Children, Committee on Special Populations. New York: Royal Fireworks Press).
30.
MinnerS. (1989). Initial referral recommendations of teachers toward gifted students with behavioral problems. Roeper Review, 12 (2), 78–80.
31.
MinnerS. (1990). Teacher evaluation of case descriptions of LD gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34 (1), 37–39.
32.
MinnerS.PraterG. (1984). College teachers' expectations of LD students. Academic Therapy, 20 (2), 225–229.
33.
MinnerS.M.PraterG.M.BloodworthH.WalkerS. (1987). Referral and placement recommendations of teachers toward gifted handicapped children. Roeper Review, 9 (4), 247–249.
MorrisonW.F. (2001). Emotional/behavioral disabilities and gifted and talented behaviors: Paradoxical or semantic differences in characteristics?Psychology in the Schools, 38 (5), 425–431.
36.
MorrisonW.F.OmdalS.N. (2000). The twice exceptional student. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 9 (2), 103.
37.
NielsenM.E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10 (2), 93–112.
38.
NeuT.W. (2003). When the gifts are camouflaged by disability. In CastellanoJ.A. (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education(pp. 151–162). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.)
39.
PattonJ.M. (1997). Disproportionate representation in gifted programs: Best practices for meeting this challenge. In ArtilesA.J.Zamora-DuranG. (Eds.), Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education(pp. ?-?). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.)
40.
PiirtroJ. (1999). Talented children and adults. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
PurcellC. (1978). Gifted and talented children's education act of 1978, Congressional Record. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
ReidB.D.McGuireM.D. (1995). Square pegs in round holes - These kids don't fit. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 402 701)
43.
ReisS.M.ColbertR. (2004). Counseling needs of academically talented students with learning disabilities. Professional School Counseling, 8 (2), 156–168.
44.
RenzulliJ.S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (3), 180–184.
45.
RenzulliJ.S. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In BaumS.M.ReisS.M.MaxfieldL.R. (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 1–28). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.)
46.
RenzulliJ.S. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 3–10). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
47.
RichertE.S. (1997). Excellence with equity in identification and programming. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 75–88). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
48.
SiegleD. (2001). Overcoming bias in gifted and talented referrals. Gifted Education Communicator, 32 (2), 22–25.
SilvermanL.K. (2003). Gifted children with learning disabilities. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 533–543). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
51.
St. JeanD. (1996). Valuing, identifying, cultivation, and rewarding talents of students from special population. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 494)
52.
StephensK.R.KarnesF.A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children66 (2), 219–238.
53.
SternbergR.J. (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 43–53). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
54.
SwessonK. (1994). Helping the gifted/learning disabled: Understanding the special needs of the “twice exceptional.”Gifted Child Today, 17 (15), 24–26.
55.
TannenbaumA.J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 27–24). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.)
56.
TannenbaumA.J.BaldwinL.J. (1983). Giftedness and learning disability: A paradoxical combination. In FoxL.H.BrodyL.TobinD. (Eds.), Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 11–36). Baltimore: University Park Press.)
57.
TaylorR.L.SmileyL.R.ZieglerE.W. (1983). The effects of labels and assigned attributes on teacher perceptions of academic and social behaviors. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18 (1), 45–51.
