Two measures of effect size are described for the Mantel–Haenszel test. Both measures belong to the r-family of effect size measures. One measure is based on a maximum-corrected model, and the second measure is based on a chance-corrected model.
References
1.
AgrestiA., & FinlayB. (1997) Statistical methods for the social sciences. (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AlhijaF. N-A. (2009) Effect size reporting practices in published articles. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 245–265.
3.
American Psychological Association. (1994) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
4.
American Psychological Association. (2001) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (5th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
5.
BerryK. J.MartinT. W., & OlsonK. F. (1974) A note on fourfold point correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 53–56.
6.
CapraroM. M., & CapraroR. M. (2003) Exploring the APA fifth edition Publication Manual's impact on the analytic preferences of journal editorial board members. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 554–565.
7.
CapraroR. M., & CapraroM. M. (2002) Treatment of effect sizes and statistical significance tests in textbooks. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 771–782.
8.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CostnerH. L. (1965) Criteria for measures of association. American Sociological Review, 30, 341–353.
CuretonE. E. (1959) Note on φ/φmax. Psychometrika, 24, 89–91.
12.
FidlerF. (2002) The fifth edition of the APA Publication Manual: why its statistics recommendations are so controversial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 749–770.
13.
Guidelines For Authors. (2010) Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 308–309.
14.
HaysW. L. (1963) Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
HunterJ. E. (1997) Needed: a ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3–7.
16.
JohnstonJ. E.BerryK. J., & MielkeP. W. (2004) A measure of effect size for experimental designs with heterogeneous variances. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 3–18.
17.
KeppelG. (1982) Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
KilleenP. R. (2005) An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16, 345–353.
19.
LoftusG. R. (1996) Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 161–171.
20.
MantelN., & HaenszelW. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
21.
McLeanJ. E., & KaufmanA. S. (2000) Editorial: statistical significance testing and other changes to Research in the Schools. Research in the Schools, 7, 1–2.
22.
MerendaP. F. (2007) Psychometrics and psychometricians in the 20th and 21st centuries: how it was in the 20th century and how it is now. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 3–20.
23.
MurphyK. R. (1997) Editorial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 3–5.
24.
PearsonK. (1904) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: XIII. On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation. Draper's Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 1–35.
25.
PedersenS. (2003) Research methods: effect sizes and “what if” analyses as supplements to statistical significance tests. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 310–319.
26.
RosenthalR. (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In CooperH. & HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage. Pp. 231–234.
27.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR., & RubinD. B. (2000) Contrasts and correlation in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11, 446–453.
28.
SnyderP. (2000) Guidelines for reporting results of group quantitative investigations. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 145–150.
29.
ThompsonB. (2002) “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: how many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider?Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64–71.
30.
Vacha-HaaseT. (2001) Statistical significance should not be considered one of life's guarantees: effect sizes are needed. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 219–224.
31.
Vacha-HaaseT.NilssonJ. E.ReetzD. R.LanceT. S., & ThompsonB. (2000) Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size. Theory & Psychology, 10, 413–425.
32.
VaughanG. M., & CorballisM. C. (1969) Beyond tests of significance: estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 204–213.
33.
WoodwardM. (1999) Epidemiology: study design and data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
