Using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model Approach to Explore the Role of Age,Motor Proficiency,and Cognitive Styles in Children's Reach Estimation Accuracy
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2014
Using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model Approach to Explore the Role of Age,Motor Proficiency,and Cognitive Styles in Children's Reach Estimation Accuracy
The purpose was to use a multi-level statistical technique to analyze how children's age, motor proficiency, and cognitive styles interact to affect accuracy on reach estimation tasks via Motor Imagery and Visual Imagery. Results from the Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis (GLMM) indicated that only the 7-year-old age group had significant random intercepts for both tasks. Motor proficiency predicted accuracy in reach tasks, and cognitive styles (object scale) predicted accuracy in the motor imagery task. GLMM analysis is suitable to explore age and other parameters of development. In this case, it allowed an assessment of motor proficiency interacting with age to shape how children represent, plan, and act on the environment.
References
1.
AdolphK. E.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.KarasikL. B. (2010) Cinderella indeed—a commentary on Iverson's ‘Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development.’Journal of Child Language, 37, 269–273. DOI: 10.1017/S030500090999047X.
2.
Al-YahyaE.DawesH.SmithL.DennisA.HowellsK.CockburnJ. (2011) Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 715–728. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008.
3.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B. (1978) Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology, 26, 337–354.
4.
BlazhenkovaO.BeckerM.KozhevnikovM. (2011) Object-spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in children and adolescents: Developmental trajectories in relation to ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 281–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.012.
5.
BlazhenkovaO.KozhevnikovM. (2010) Visual-object ability: A new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition, 117, 276–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021.
6.
BerkL. E. (1999) Infants, children, and adolescents. (3rd ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BruininksR. H.BruininksB. D. (2005) Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. (2nd ed.) Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
8.
CaçolaP.SpessatoB.GabbardC. (2014) An age-related view of the role of object and spatial cognitive styles in distance estimation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 147–156. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.876028.
9.
CaeyenberghsK.TsoupasJ.WilsonP. H.Smits-EngelsmanB. C. M. (2009) Motor imagery in primary school children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34(1), 103–121. DOI: 10.1080/87565640802499183.
CarelloC.GrosofskyA.ReichelF. D.SolomonH. Y.TurveyM. T. (1989) Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1, 27–54.
12.
CarrollJ. (1993) Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
13.
CassentiD. (2011) The intrinsic link between motor behavior and temporal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 72–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.011.
14.
ChoiH. J.MarkL. S. (2004) Scaling affordances for human reach actions. Human Movement Science, 23, 785–806. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.004.
15.
ChoudhuryS.CharmanT.BirdV.BlakemoreS. J. (2007) Development of action representation during adolescence. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 255–262.
16.
ClarkJ. E.MetcalfeJ. M. (2002) The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. In ClarkJ. E.HumphreyJ. H. (Eds.), Motor development: Research and reviews. Vol. 2. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Pp. 163–190.
17.
CoelloY.Delevoye-TurrellY. (2007) Embodiment, spatial categorization and action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 667–683. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.003.
18.
CordovaA.GabbardC. (2012) Children's use of allocentric cues in visually- and memory-guided reach space. International Journal of Behavior Development, 36(1), 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/0165025411426681.
19.
CorenS. (1993) The Lateral Preference Inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 1–3.
20.
DaceyJ. S.TraversJ. F. (2006) Human development across the lifespan. (6th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
DecetyJ.GrèzesJ. (1999) Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172–178. DOI: 10.1016/S1364–6613(99)01312–1.
22.
DügerT.BuminG.UyanikaM.AkiE.KayihanH. (1999) The assessment of Bruininks-Osteretsky test of motor proficiency in children. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 3, 125–131.
FrickA.DaumM. M.WilsonM.WilkeningF. (2009) Effects of action on children's and adults' mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 34–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.003.
25.
FunkM.BruggerP.WilkeningF. (2005) Motor processes in children's imagery: The case of mental rotation of hands. Developmental Science, 8(5), 402–408. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–7687.2005.00428.x.
26.
GabbardC. (2009) Studying action representation in children via motor imagery. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 234–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.011.
27.
GabbardC.CordovaA.AmmarD. (2007) Estimation of reach in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: A developmental view. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32(3), 749–756. DOI: 10.1080/87565640701539451.
28.
GabbardC. P. (2011) Lifelong motor development. (6th ed.) San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
29.
GallahueD. L.OzmunJ. C.GoodwayJ. D. (2012) Understanding motor development. (7th ed.) Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
30.
GalleseV.RochatM.CossuG.SinigagliaC. (2009) Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology, 45, 103–113. DOI: 10.1037/a0014436.
31.
GrushR. (2004) The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–396. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000093.
32.
HaywoodK. M.GetchellN. (2009) Life span motor development. (5th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33.
JarrayaM.ChtourouH.SouissiN.ChamariK. (2011) Effect of aerobic physical exercise and training status on the perceived egocentric distances. BIO Web of Conferences, 1(00042). DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20110100042.
34.
JeannerodM. (2006) Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
35.
JohnsonS.CorballisP.GazzanigaM. (2001) Within grasp but out of reach: Evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 39, 36–50. DOI: 10.1016/S00283932(00)00096–8.
36.
KosslynS. M. (1999) If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 354(1387), 1283–1294. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0479.
37.
MolinaM.TijusC.JouenF. (2008) The emergence of motor imagery in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(3), 196–209.
38.
NipI. S. B.GreenJ. R.MarxD. B. (2011) The coemergence of cognition, language, and speech motor control in early development: A longitudinal correlation study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 149–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.08.002.
39.
OliverB.GabbardC.CaçolaP.BobbioT. (2012) Examining the age-related ability to maintain visual images. International Journal of Mind, Brain, & Cognition, 3(1), 59–72.
40.
PangelinanM. M.ZhangG.VanMeterJ. W.ClarkJ. E.HatfieldB. D.HauflerA. J. (2011) Beyond age and gender: Relationships between cortical and subcortical brain volume and cognitive-motor abilities in school-age children. NeuroImage, 54(4), 3093–3100. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.021.
41.
RieserJ. J.GaringA. E.YoungM. F. (1994) Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: It's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. Child Development, 65, 1262–1278.
42.
RobertonM. A. (1982) Describing ‘stages’ within and across motor tasks. In KelsoJ. A. S.ClarkJ. E. (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport – 1979. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 269–279.
43.
VasilyevaM.LourencoS. F. (2012) Development of spatial cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3, 349–362. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1171.
44.
WilsonB. N.KaplanB. J.CrawfordS. G.DeweyD. (2000) Interrater reliability of the Bruininks-Osteretsky Test of Motor Proficiency–Long Form. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 95–110.
45.
WolpertD. M.KawatoM. (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11(7–8), 1317–1329. DOI: 10.1016/S0893–6080(98)00066–5.
46.
WongG. Y.MasonW. M. (1985) The hierarchical logistic regression model for multilevel analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(391), 513–524.
