The Sport Motivation Scale was developed in French and later translated into English and validated by Pelletier, et al. in 1995. It is based on the principles of self-determination theory. In this study the scale was translated into Spanish to assess and validate it for a sample of 275 athletes (78 women and 197 men) whose mean age was 21.3 yr. (SD = 3.8) and who represented eight sports (track and field, tennis, swimming, waterpolo, soccer, basketball, handball, and volleyball). The Spanish version showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach α of .70 to .80) and temporal stability (test-retest r = .69 to .74) over a 4-wk. period. A confirmatory factor analysis partially supported the seven-factor structure. Correlations among the subscales indicated a simplex pattern supporting the construct validity of the scale. Sex differences were found. Taken together, these findings support use of the Spanish version for assessment of motivation in sport.
References
1.
BentlerP. M. (1995) EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2.
BrièreN. M.VallerandR. J.BlaisM. R.PelletierL. G. (1995) Devéloppement et validation d'une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d'amotivation en contexte sportif: L'echelle de motivation dans les sports (ÉMS). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 465–489.
3.
BrislinR. W. (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW.BerryJ. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 137–164.
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongsJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 136–162.
5.
CarminesE.McIverJ. (1981) Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In BohrnstedtG.BorgattaE. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 65–115.
6.
CokleyK. O. (2000) Examining the validity of the Academic Motivation Scale by comparing scale construction to self-determination theory. Psychological Reports, 86, 560–564.
7.
DeciE. L. (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1991) A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In DienstbierR. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation. Lincoln, NE: Univer. of Nebraska. Pp. 237–288.
10.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1999) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
11.
DoganisG. (2000) Development of a Greek version of the Sport Motivation Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 505–512.
12.
HeinV.MüürM.KokaA. (2004) Intention to be physically active after school graduation and its relationship to three types of intrinsic motivation. European Physical Education Review, 10, 5–19.
13.
HollembeakJ.AmoroseA. J. (2005) Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes' intrinsic motivation: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 20–36.
14.
HoyleR. H. (1995) Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
16.
JöreskogK. G. (1969) A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.
17.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993) Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Inc.
18.
KokaA.HeinV. (2005) The effect of perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical education. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 91–106.
19.
LiF.HarmerP. H. (1996) Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Sport Motivation Scale: A structural equation modeling analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 396–405.
20.
MartensM. P.WebberS. N. (2002) Psychometric properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: An evaluation with college varsity athletes from the U.S.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 254–270.
21.
NúñezJ. L.Martín-AlboJ.NavarroJ. G. (2005) Validación de la versión española de la èchelle de motivation en èducation. Psicothema, 17, 344–349.
22.
PelletierL. G.TusonD. M.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BrièreN. M.BlaisM. R. (1995) Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–53.
23.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
24.
SarrazinP.VallerandR.GuilletE.PelletierL.CuryF. (2002) Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 395–418.
25.
VallerandR. J. (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 29. Toronto: Academic Press. Pp. 271–360.
26.
VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.BlaisM. R.BrièreN. M.SenécalC.VallièresE. F. (1992) The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
27.
VallerandR. J.RatelleC. F. (2002) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), The motivation and self-determination of behavior: Theoretical and applied issues. Rochester, NY: Univer. of Rochester. Pp. 37–63.
