Reduced Relative Frequency of Knowledge of Results without Visual Feedback in Learning a Golf-Putting Task

Abstract

This study examined the effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results (KR) on learning to putt in golf. Participants (19 men and 15 women) putted a golf ball, stopping the ball on a line at a distance of 3.5 m from the starting position, which included an uphill portion. After a pretest, participants were assigned as they arrived in balanced order by sex to one of two groups (100% KR, 33% KR) and practiced 60 trials. Those in the 100% KR group performed the task in its natural context, while others assigned to the 33% KR were shown the location of the putted ball after every third trial. All participants then performed a posttest and two retention tests, done 10 min. and 24 hr. after the posttest. Analysis at posttest showed each group had a constant error and an absolute constant error (|CE|) less than those at pretest. Also, in the retention test conducted the following day, the constant error of the 33% KR group was less than that of the 100% KR group. Third, in the posttest and both retention tests, the |CE| of the 100% KR group was larger than that of the 33% KR group. These results suggest that reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results is effective in learning the accuracy of the golf putt.

References

Adams

J. A.

(1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111ndash;149.

Bilodeau

E. A.

Bilodeau

I. M.

(1958) Variable frequency of knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 379ndash;383.

Butki

B. D.

Hoffman

S. J.

(2003) Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 569ndash;580.

Lai

Shea

C. H.

(1999) The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 33ndash;40.

Lee

T. D.

White

M. A.

Carnahan

(1990) On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 191ndash;208.

Magill

R. A.

(2001) Augmented feedback in motor skill. In Singer

R. N.

Hausenblas

H. A.

Janelle

C. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology. New York: Wiley. Pp. 86–114.

Magill

R. A.

(2007) Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. (8th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Newell

K. M.

(1973) Flight feedback and learning a projectile task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 65ndash;72.

Salmoni

A. W.

Schmidt

R. A.

Walter

C. B.

(1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355ndash;386.

10.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225ndash;260.

11.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1991a) Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In Requin

Stelmach

G. E.

(Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Pp. 59–75.

12.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1991b) Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

13.

Schmidt

R. A.

Lange

Young

D. E.

(1990) Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 325ndash;348.

14.

Schmidt

R. A.

Lee

T. D.

(2005) Motor control and learning: Behavioral emphasis. (4th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

15.

Schmidt

R. A.

Wrisberg

C. A.

(2004) Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

16.

Sidaway

Yook

Fairweather

(2001) Visual and verbal guidance in the learning of a novel motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 40, 43ndash;63.

17.

Sparrow

W. A.

Summers

J. J.

(1992) Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 197ndash;209.

18.

Winstein

C. J.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 677ndash;691.

19.

Wulf

Shea

Matschiner

(1998) Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 180ndash;192.