Effect of Intertrial Interval and Verbal Reinforcement on Choice of Front or Back Tongue Position

Abstract

Intertrial intervals of 2 sec. as compared with 4 sec. significantly increased choice of front-articulated vowels as compared with back-articulated vowels in 4 reinforced and 4 non-reinforced groups of 5 Ss each. Ss who were native English speakers showed a significant preference for front over back-articulated vowels. The hypothesis that shorter intertrial intervals would increase conditioning was not supported since no reinforcement effects were found. Discrimination between the two response classes of front and back-articulated vowels was demonstrated in the 4 2-sec. intertrial interval groups as compared with the 4 4-sec. intertrial interval groups. The preference for front over back-articulated vowels and increased preference for the front over back-articulated vowels due to shorter intertrial intervals was discussed in terms of stimulus choice due to prior learning of English.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chomsky

Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.

Denes

P. B.

On the statistics of spoken English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963, 35, 892–904.

Dixon

P. W.

Hammond

Operant conditioning of spoken phonemes /s/ and /z/ and awareness. Psychological Reports, 1970, 26, 87–92.

Greenspoon

The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses. American Journal of Psychology, 1955, 68, 409–416.

Lenneberg

E. H.

On explaining language. Science, 1969, 164, 635–643.

Skinner

B. F.

Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

Taffel

Anxiety and the conditioning of verbal behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1955, 51, 496–501.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

Wise

C. M.

Introduction to phonetics. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1957.