Evaluative and Affective Dimensions of Self-Concept: A Test of Construct Validity Using Structural Equations Modeling

Abstract

It has been suggested that self-concept has both an evaluative and an affective dimension. Measures of self-concept, task satisfaction and performance were obtained from a sample of 188 Northern Irish university students. Using confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL 8), it was shown that, whereas a one-factor model did not fit the self-concept data, a two-factor model in which evaluative items loaded on one factor and affective items on the other, demonstrated a good fit (Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.99). Further, a structural model in which evaluative self-concept was related to performance and affective self-concept was related to task satisfaction also fitted (IFI = 0.99). Thus, both the discriminant and construct validity of affective and evaluative self-concept were demonstrated. This may mean that previous studies have underestimated the magnitude of relationships between self-concept and other variables such as achievement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. C.

Gerbing

D. W.

(1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

Aron

E. N.

(1994) Statistics for psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. London: Sage. Pp. 256–293.

Byrne

B. M.

(1984) The general/academic self-concept nomological network: a review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427–456.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

(1986) On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474–481.

Gerbing

D. W.

Anderson

J. C.

(1993) Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. London: Sage. Pp. 40–65.

Ghiselli

E. E.

Campbell

J. P.

Zedeck

(1981) Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

Holmes-Smith

Rowe

K. J.

(1994) The development and use of congeneric measurement models in school effectiveness research: improving the reliability and validity of composite and latent variables for fitting multilevel and structural equation models. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Melbourne, Australia

Jöreskög

K. G.

(1993) Testing structural equation models. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. London: Sage. Pp. 294–316.

10.

Joureskoug

K. G.

Lawley

D. N.

(1968) New methods in maximum likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 21, 85–96.

11.

Jöreskög

K. G.

Sörbom

(1989) LISREL 7 user's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, Inc.

12.

Latham

G. P.

Locke

E. A.

(1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212–247.

13.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990) Work motivation and satisfaction: light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science. 1, 240–246.

14.

Marsh

H. W.

(1990) The structure of academic self-concept: the Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 623–636.

15.

Marsh

H. W.

(1992) Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35–42.

16.

Marsh

H. W.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

(1988) A multifaceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366–380.

17.

Marsh

H. W.

Gouvernet

P. J.

(1989) Multidimensional self-concepts and perceptions of control: construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 57–69.

18.

Marsh

H. W.

Hocevar

(1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.

19.

Marsh

H. W.

MacDonald

Holmes I. W.

(1990) Multidimensional self-concepts: construct validation of responses by children. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 89–117.

20.

Marsh

H. W.

O'Neill

(1984) Self-description Questionnaire: III. The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.

21.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

Barnes

(1985) Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: their relationship to age, sex and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422–444.

22.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

J. W.

Smith

I. D.

(1983) Preadolescent self-concept: its relation to academic ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 60–78.

23.

Marsh

H. W.

Relich

J. D.

Smith

I. D.

(1983) Self-concept: the construct validity of interpretations based on the SDQ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173–187.

24.

Marsh

H. W.

Shavelson

(1985) Self-concept: its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–123.

25.

Marsh

H. W.

Smith

I. D.

Barnes

Butler

(1983) Self-concept: reliability, dimensionality, validity, and the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 772–790.

26.

Mathews

MacLeod

(1994) Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.

27.

Munck

I. M. E.

(1979) Model building in comparative education: applications of the LISREL method to cross-national survey data. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement Monograph Series, No. 10. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.

28.

Newstead

Dennis

(1994) Examiners examined: the reliability of exam marking in psychology. Psychologist, 7, 216–219.

29.

Pierce

J. L.

Gardner

D. G.

Cummings

L. L.

Dunham

R. B.

(1989) Organization-based self-esteem: construct definition, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622–648.

30.

Pierce

J. L.

Gardner

D. G.

Dunham

R. B.

Cummings

L. L.

(1993) Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition—employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 271–288.

31.

Quinn

R. P.

Staines

G. L.

(1979) The 1977 Quality of Employment Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, Univer. of Michigan.

32.

Shavelson

R. J.

Bolus

(1982) Self-concept: the interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 3–17.

33.

Shavelson

R. J.

Hubner

J. J.

Stanton

G. C.

(1976) Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

34.

Tanaka

J. S.

(1993) Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. London Sage Pp. 256–293.

35.

Tulving

Thompson

D. M.

(1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.

36.

Weiner

(1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

37.

Werts

C. E.

Rock

D. R.

Linn

R. L.

Jöreskog

K. G.

(1978) A general method of estimating the reliability of a composite. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 933–938.

38.

Wothke

(1993) Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. London: Sage. Pp. 256–293.