Alcohol Prevention and Evaluation in the Era of Evidence Based Practice – the Need for a Systematic Approach to Evaluation

Anderberg M. , & Dahlberg M. (2005): Reflections on How Research and Local Practice Can Evolve Together. NAD publication 47: 71–95

Babor T.F. , & Biddle-Higgins J.C. & Saunders J.B. , & Monteiro M.G. (2001): AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva: World Health Organization

Babor T.F. , & Caetano R. , & Casswell R. , & Edwards G. , & Giesbrecht N. (2010): Alcohol: no ordinary commodity – research and public policy. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Baker P. , & Young M. , & Thomas R. (2006): Summary of Evidence: Systematic Reviews on Alcohol Dependence. Queensland Government, Australia

Blom B. , & Morén S. (2003): Explaining Human Change – On Generative Mechanism in Social Work Practice. Journal of Critical Realism 2(1): 37–60

Bullock S. (2004): Alcohol, Drugs and Student Lifestyle! A Study of The Attitudes, Beliefs and Use of Alcohol and Drugs Among Swedish University Students. SoRAD Research Report 21. Stockholm university, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs

Chan A-W. , & Altman D.G. (2005): Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials on PubMed: Review of publications and survey of authors. British Medical Journal 330, 753–756

Cook T.D. (2006): Criminal and Social Justice. London: SAGE Publications

Cuijpers P. (2002): Effective ingredients of drug prevention programs. A systematic Review. Addictive Behaviors 27(6): 1009–1023

Dahmström K. (1996): Från datainsamling till rapport – Att göra en statistisk undersökning (From Data Collection to Report – Performing a Statistical Study). Lund: Studentlitteratur

Dickersin K. (2005): Publication bias: Recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm. In: Rothstein H. , & Sutton A. , & Borenstein M. (eds.): Publication Bias in Meta Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Chichester: John Wiley

Dir. 2007:161 Kommittédirektiv – Socialt råd (Committé Directive for the Social Council). Stockholm: Regeringskansliet

Dombrowski S.U. , & Sniehotta F.F. , & Avenell A. , & Coyne J.C. (2007): Towards a cumulative science of behaviour change: Do current conduct and reporting of behavioural interventions fall short of best practice? Psychology and Health 22: 869–874.

Durlak J.A. (1998): Why program implementation is important. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 17(2): 5–18

Egger M. , & Davey Smith G. , & Altman D. (eds.) (2000): Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books

FHI (2003): Uppföljning av nationella hand-lingsplanen för att förebygga alkoholskador (A Follow-up of the National Alcohol Prevention Plan). Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut

FHI (2008): Effekter av lokalt alkohol- och narkotikaförebyggande arbete (Outcomes of Local Alcohol and Drug Prevention Initatives). Östersund: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut

FHI (2009): Det drogförebyggande arbetet i Sverige 2008. Rapport om det förebyggande arbetet mot alkohol-, narkotika-, tobaksoch dopningsproblem (Drog Prevention efforts in Sweden 2008. Report on the Prevention of Alcohol, Narcotics, Tobacco and Drugs). Östersund: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut

Foxcroft D. , & Ireland D. & Lister-Sharp D. , & Lowe G. , & Breen R. (2003): Longer-Term Primary Prevention for Alcohol Misuse in Young People: A Systematic Review. Addiction 98: 397–411

Gendreau P. (1996): Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior 23: 144–161

Gendreau P. , & Andrews D.A. (2001): The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory 2000 (CPAI 2000). Saint John: University of New Brunswick

Hallgren M. , & Källmén H. , & Leifman H. , & Sjölund T. , & Andréasson S. (2009): Evaluation of an alcohol risk reduction program (PRIME for Life) in young Swedish military conscripts. Health Education 109(2): 155–168

Haraschi T.W. , (1999): Employers and the Employment Option of the New Deal for Young Unemployed People: Employment additionality and its measurement. Institute for Employment Research. University of Warwick, England

Hope T. (2005): Pretend it Doesn't Work: The ‘Anti-Social’ Bias in the Maryland Scientific Methods Scale. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 11: 275–296

Karlsson T. , & Tigerstedt C. (2004): Testing new models in Finnish, Norweigan and Swedish alcohol policies. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 21(English Supplement): 79–91

Kriminalvården (2007): Kriminalvårdens FoU-strategi 2008–2010 (Swedish Prison and Probation Service – R&D Strategy 2008–2010). Norrköping: Kriminalvården

Lab S.P. (2007): Crime Prevention. Approaches, practices and evaluations. Cincinnati: LexisNexis

Latessa E. (1999): What Works in Correctional Intervention? Southern Illinois University Law Journal 23: 415–426

Lilja J. , & Giota J. , & Larsson S. (2004): Olika synsätt på utvärderingar av prevention-sprogram för skolor. (Different Views Upon Evaluations of School-based prevention programmes). Nordisk alkohol- och narkotikatidskrift 21(4–5): 297–307

McCord J. (2003): Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587(1): 16–30

Matthews B. , & Jones Hubbard D. , & Latessa E. (2001): Making the Next Step: Using Evaluability Assessment to Improve Correctional Programming. The Prison Journal 81: 454–472

Michi S. , & Fixsen D. , & Grimshaw J. , & Eccles M. (2009): Specifying and reporting complex behavior change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implementation Science 4(1): 40

NREPP (2009): Prime for Life Intervention Summary. National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices, U.S.A.

Patton M.Q. (1997): Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications

Patton M.Q. (2000): A vison of Evaluation that Strengthens Democracy, paper from EES conference in Lausanne October 12 th–14th

Petrosino A. (2003): Om och varför? Den potentiella nyttan av att inkludera programteoriutvärderingar i metanalys (If and Why? The Potential Benefit of Including Program Theory Evaluations in Meta Analysis). Socvet 2–3–02

Pohorecky L.A. (1991): Stress and alcohol interaction: An update of human research. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 15(3): 438–459

Prop. 1994/95:150 Bil.5 Medel för alkohol- och drogpolitiska åtgärder (Appendix 5: Funds for Alcohol and Drug Actions). Stockholm, Regeringskansliet

Prop. 2000/01:20 Nationell handlingsplan för att förebygga alkoholskador (National Plan of Action for Prevention of Alcohol Harm). Stockholm, Socialdepartementet

Prop. 2005/06:30 Nationella alkohol- och narkotikahandlingsplaner (National Alcohol and Drug Policies). Stockholm, Socialdepartementet

Reeder J. (2010): Det tystade samtalet. Om staten, psykiatrin och försöken att undanröja det psykoanalytiska inflytandet (The Silenced Conversation. About the State, Psychiatry and the Efforts to Remove the Psychoanalytical Influence). Stockholm: Norsteds

Riley B.L. , & MacDonald J. , & Mansi O. , & Kothari A. , & Kurtz D. , & von Tettenborn L. , & Edwards N. (2008): Is reporting on interventions a weak link in understanding how and why they work? A preliminary exploration using community heart health exemplars. Implementation Science 3: 27

Rothstein H.R. (2007): Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results. Journal of Experimental Criminology 4: 61–81

Sanderson I. (2000): Complexity, Evaluation and Evidence-Based Policy. Paper for European Evaluation Society, October 12–14th. Lausanne, Switzerland

Sandberg B. (2006): Utvärdering av Prime for Life – genomförande samt effekter av alkoliolpreventiv utbildning vid Örebro universitet (Evaluation of Prime for Life – Implementation and Outcomes of Alcohol Prevention Training at Örebro University). SoRAD Research report 38. Stockholm university, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs

Sandberg B. (2007a): Prime for Life – kompletterande analyser samt metodologiska erfarenheter från utvärderingen av Prime for Life vid Örebro universitet (Prime for Life – Complementing Analysis and Methodological Experiences from the Evaluation of Prime for Life at Örebro University). SoRAD Research Report 41. Stockholm university, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs

Sandberg B. (2007b): Utvärdering av Prime for Life inom Försvarsmakten (Evaluation of Prime for Life in the Swedish Armed Forces). SoRAD Research Report 44. Stockholm university, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs

Sandberg B. , & Faugert S. (2007): Perspektiv på utvärdering (Perspectives on Evaluation). Lund: Studentlitteratur

SBU (2001): Behandling av alkohol- och narkotikaproblem. En evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning (Treatment of Alcohol and Drug Problems. A Systematic Review of Evidence) Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, Stockholm

Sjölund T. , & Andréasson S. (2004): PRIME For Life, rapport II. Uppföljning av gymnasieelevers och värnpliktigas alkoholvanor fem månader efter genomgången kurs (Prime for Life, Report II. A Follow-up of High School Pupils’ and Military Conscripts’ Alcohol Use Five Months after the Program). STAD-Rapport 25. Stockholm förebygger alkohol- och drogproblem, Stockholm

Statskontoret (2002): Utvärderingar och politik II (Evaluations and Politics II). Statskontoret 2002: 21. Stockholm: Statskontoret

Sundell K. , & Soydan H. , & Tengvald K. , & Anttila S. (2009): From Opinion-Based to Evidence-Based Social Work: The Swedish Case. Research on Social Work Practice 20: 714–722

Sutton A. , & Abrams K. , & Jones D. (2001): An illustrated guide to the methods of meta-analysis. Journal of Evaluation of Clinical Practice 7(2): 135–148

Tilley N. (2000): Realistic Evaluation: An Overview. Paper presented at the Funding Conference of the Danish Evaluation Society, September 2000

Tilley N. (ed.) (2002): Evaluation for Crime Prevention. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press

Vedung E. (1998): Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning (Evaluation in Politics and Public Management). Lund: Studentlitteratur

WHO (2004): What are the most effective and cost-effective interventions in alcohol control? World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

WHO (2009): Handbook for action to reduce alcohol-related harm. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.