The relative significance and influence of a variety of measures of urban form on household vehicle kilometers traveled, automobile ownership, and mode choice were investigated. The travel data came from the 1990 San Francisco Bay Area travel surveys, and the land use data were largely constructed from hectare-level descriptions provided by the Association of Bay Area Governments. After demographic characteristics were controlled for, the measures of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance—computed for trip-makers’ home neighborhoods and at trip ends—proved to be highly statistically significant and influential in their impact on all measures of travel behavior. In many cases, balance, mix, and accessibility were found to be more relevant (as measured by elasticities) than several household and traveler characteristics that often form a basis for travel behavior prediction. In contrast, under all but the vehicle ownership models, the impact of density was negligible after accessibility was controlled.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KelbaughD.(ed.). The Pedestrian Pocket Book. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1989.
2.
Transit-Oriented Development Impacts on Travel Behavior. Calthorpe Associates, Inc., San Francisco, 1992.
3.
BookoutL. W.Neotraditional Town Planning: Cars, Pedestrians, and Transit. Urban Land, Feb.1992, pp. 10–15.
4.
NewmanP., and KenworthyJ.. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower Publishing, Aldershot, England, 1989.
5.
PushkarevB. S., and ZupanJ. M.. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1977.
6.
HoltzclawJ.Manhattanization vs. Sprawl: How Urban Density Impacts Auto Use Comparing Five Bay Area Communities. Presented at the 11th International Pedestrian Conference, 1990.
7.
HoltzclawJ.Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Automobile Dependence and Cost. California Home Energy Efficiency Rating Systems; Natural Resources Defense Council, San Francisco, 1994.
8.
CheslowM. D., and NeelsJ. K.. The Effect of Urban Development Patterns on Transportation Energy Use. In Transportation Research Record 764, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 70–78.
KitamuraR., MokhtarianP. L., and LaidetL.. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.
11.
CerveroR.America’s Suburban Centers: The Land Use–Transportation Link. Unwin-Hyman, Boston, 1989.
12.
PivoG. E.The Intrasuburban Pattern of Office Suburbanization: Form and Impact in the San Francisco Bay Area. In The City of the 21st Century (PihlakM., ed.), 1988.
13.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc.The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Management Strategies on Commuting Behavior. Contract DTFH61-91-C-00085. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July1994.
14.
HopperK. G.NCHRP Report 323: Travel Characteristics at Large-Scale Suburban Activity Centers. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989.
15.
FrankL. D., and PivoG.. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density of Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 44–52.
16.
KockelmanK.Which Matters More in Mode Choice: Density or Income?: The Relative Effects of Population Density and Income on Modal Split in Urban Areas. Proc., ITE District 6 Conference, Denver, Colo., 1995.
17.
LevinsonH. S., and WynnF. H.. Effects of Density on Urban Transportation Requirements. In Highway Research Record 2, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1963, pp. 38–64.
18.
BurnsL.Transportation, Temporal, and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 1979.
19.
PirieG. H.Measurement of Geographic Accessibility. Public Administration Series: Bibliograph P676 Vance Bibliographies, Monticello, Ill., 1981.
20.
AllenW. B., LiuD., and SingerS.. Accessibility Measures of U.S. Metropolitan Areas. In Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 27, No. 6, Dec.1993, pp. 439–449.
21.
WachsM., and KumagaiT. G.. Physical Accessibility as a Social Indicator. UMTA (PB 212-740). School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, 1972.
22.
HandyS.Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and its Implications for Non-Work Travel. Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1992, pp. 252–267.
23.
LevinsonD.Location, Relocation, and the Journey to Work. Presented at the Western Regional Science Conference, San Diego, Nov. 1995.
24.
LevinsonD., and KumarA.. A Multimodal Trip Distribution Model: Structure and Application. In Transportation Research Record 1446, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
25.
FrankL. D.An Analysis of Relationship Between Urban Form (Density, Mix, and Jobs: Housing Balance) and Travel Behavior (Mode Choice, Trip Generation, Trip Length, and Travel Time). Washington State Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation, July1994.
26.
MessengerT., and EwingR.. Transit-Oriented Development in the Sunbelt. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 145–153.
27.
AttaranM.Industrial Diversity and Economic Performance. The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 44–54.
28.
GarrisonC. B., and PaulsonA.. An Entropy Measure of the Geographic Concentration of Economic Activity. Economic Geography, Vol. 49, 1973, pp. 319–324.
29.
ShannonC. E., and WeaverW.. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1962 (c.1949).
30.
MillerV. P., and QuigleyJ.. Segregation by Racial and Demographic Group: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Paper 14. University of California Transportation Center, 1990.
31.
ProcosD.Mixed Land Use: From Revival to Innovation. Dowden, Hutchison, & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa., 1976.
32.
LynchK.Good City Form. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
33.
Bendavid-ValA.Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners, 4th ed.Praeger, Westport, Conn., 1991.
34.
RodgersA.Some Aspects of Industrial Diversification in the United States. Economic Geography, Vol. 33, 1957, pp. 16–30.
35.
TressR. C.Unemployment and the Diversification of Industry. The Manchester School, Vol. 3, 1938, pp. 140–152.
36.
TomazinisA. R.A Study on Factors Affecting Success of Suburban Mass Transit Lines. Final Report. UMTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979.
37.
TieboutC.A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 64, 1964, pp. 416–424.
38.
HandyS.How Land Use Patterns Affect Travel Patterns: A Bibliography. Bibliography No. 279. Council of Planning Librarians, Chicago, 1992.
