Speed Photo–Radar Enforcement and Its Effects on Speed in Work Zones

Abstract

Automated speed photo–radar enforcement (SPE) in work zones was implemented for the first time in the United States in Illinois. This paper presents the results of the effectiveness of SPE on the basis of three data sets collected in two work zones. SPE was effective in reducing the average speed and increasing compliance with the work zone speed limit in all three data sets. In almost all cases in which SPE was implemented, the average speeds were significantly lower than the work zone speed limit. The average free-flowing speed of cars was reduced by 4.2 to 7.9 mph, and that of trucks by 3.4 to 6.9 mph. SPE reduced the percentage of cars and heavy vehicles exceeding the speed limit significantly. The percentages of free-flowing cars exceeding the speed limit were reduced from 39.8% to 8.3% in Data Set 1, from 30.4% to 4.2% in Data Set 2, and from 93.2% to 45.5% in Data Set 3. The percentages of free-flowing heavy vehicles exceeding the speed limit were reduced from 17.3% to 4.2% in Data Set 1; from 6.1% to 1.2% in Data Set 2; and from 69.2% to 13.9% in Data Set 3. Trucks did not exceed the speed limit by more than 10 mph in any of the data sets when SPE was implemented. In two data sets no cars exceeded the speed limit by more than 10 mph, while in the third data set only 2.5% did. Field data were also collected after the SPE van left the work zone to examine the halo (temporal) effects of SPE. SPE had a halo effect of 1.8∼2.7 mph on free-flowing trucks in one work zone but none in the other work zone. The halo effect of SPE on free-flowing cars was a limited 1.2 mph on the shoulder lane in only one data set.

References

Speed and Accidents: A Preliminary Report. Ministry of Transport and Communications, Ontario, Canada, 1974.

Pisarski

A. E.

Deep-Six 55. Reason Foundation, Vol. 17, No. 6 1986, pp. 32–35.

Cerelli

E. C.

Safety Consequences of Raising the National Speed Limit from 55 mph to 60 mph. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1981.

Garber

N. J.

and Gadiraju

. Factors Affecting Speed Variance and Its Influence on Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1213, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 64–71.

Benekohal

R. F.

Chitturi

Hajbabaie

Wang

M.-H.

and Medina

J. C.

. Automated Speed Photo Enforcement Effects on Speeds in Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2055, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 11–20.

Goldenbeld

and Van Schagen

. The Effects of Speed Enforcement with Mobile Radar on Speed and Accidents: An Evaluation Study on Rural Roads in the Dutch Province Friesland. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 6 2005, pp. 1135–1144.

Chen

Meckle

and Wilson

. Speed and Safety Effect of Photo Radar Enforcement on a Highway Corridor in British Columbia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 2 2002, pp. 129–138.

Bloch

S. A.

Comparative Study of Speed Reduction Effects of Photo-Radar and Speed Display Boards. In Transportation Research Record 1640, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 27–36.

Oei

N. L.

The Effect of Enforcement on Speed Behaviour: A Literature Review. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 1998.

10.

Rogerson

Newstead

and Cameron

. Evaluation of the Speed Camera Program in Victoria 1990–1991, Phase 3. Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, 1994.

11.

Benekohal

R. F.

Hajbabaie

Medina

J. C.

Wang

M.-H.

and Chitturi

. Speed Photo-Radar Enforcement Evaluation in Illinois Work Zones. Final Report. Illinois Center for Transportation, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, June 2008.