The rapid bridge construction (RBC) technique is the most recent application of precast concrete technology. While time saving is the main advantage of this emerging technology, a major obstacle to adopting RBC is the common perception that it has a high initial cost. This paper presents a methodology for assessing the savings in time and user costs associated with adopting RBC techniques. A case study is also presented to demonstrate how the assessment methodology can be implemented. A comparison study was carried out to assess the performance of RBC through use of an actual bridge construction project. The results of this study indicate that RBC technology may offer a more efficient and economical alternative to the conventional method.
References
1.
AbudayyehO., Abdel-QaderI., NabulsiS., and WeberJ.Using Non-Destructive Technologies and Methods in Bridge Management Systems. Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, April 2004, pp. 63–76.
ShahawyM. A.NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 324: Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems to Limit Traffic Disruption During Construction.Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
7.
Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/prefab. 2008. Accessed Dec. 30, 2008.
8.
KroppP. K., MilinskiE. L., GutzwillerM. J., and LeeR. B.Use of Precast Prestressed Concrete for Bridge Decks. Joint Highway Research Project 75–15, Final Report. Purdue University and Indiana State Highway Commission, West Lafayette, 1975.
BiswasM.On Modular Full Depth Bridge Deck Rehabilitation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 1, 1986, pp. 105–120.
11.
BiswasM., OseguedaR. A., and NoelJ. S.Scale-Model Tests for Full-Depth Precast Concrete Panel-Decked Composite Bridge Span. In Transportation Research Record 950, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 163–173.
12.
Dauphin Island Bridge.PCI Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, Jan.–Feb. 1984, pp. 128–147.
13.
BadieS. S., KamelM. R., and TadrosM. K.Precast Pretensioned Trapezoidal Box Beam for Short Span Bridges. PCI Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, Jan.–Feb. 1999, pp. 48–59.
14.
BadieS. S., BaishyaM. C., and TadrosM. K.Nudeck—An Efficient and Economical Precast Prestressed Bridge Deck System. PCI Journal, Vol. 43, No. 5, Sept.–Oct. 1998, pp. 56–74.
15.
BillingtonS. L., BarnesR. W., and BreenJ. E.Alternate Substructure Systems for Standard Highway Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, March–April 2001, pp. 87–94.
16.
BillingtonS., BarnesR., and BreenJ.A Precast Substructure Design for Standard Bridge Systems. Project Summary Report. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 1999.
17.
FagundoF. E., TabatabaiH., SoongswangK., RichardsonJ. M., and CallisE. G.Precast Panel Composite Bridge Decks. Concrete International, Vol. 7, No. 5, May 1985, pp. 59–65.
CulmoM. P.Rapid Bridge Deck Replacement with Full-Depth Precast Concrete Slabs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1712, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 139–146.
20.
CulmoM. P.Bridge Deck Rehabilitation Using Precast Concrete Slabs. In Proc., Eighth Annual International Bridge Conference, Pittsburgh, Pa., Engineers’ Society of Western Pennsylvania, June 10–12, 1991, pp. 389–396.
21.
HieberD., WackerJ., EberhardM., and StantonJ.State-of-the-Art Report on Precast Concrete Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges.Final Technical Report. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2005.
22.
Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems in Japan and Europe. FHWA International Technology Exchange Programs, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
23.
MatsumotoE., WaggonerM., SumenG., KregerM., and BreenJ.Development of a Precast at Bent Cap System. Project Summary Report 1748-S. University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
DunkerK. F., and RabbatR. G.Performance of Prestressed Concrete Highway Bridges in the United States—The First 40 Years. PCI Journal, Vol. 41, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 59–65.
