A megaregion is characterized by common economic structures, culture, history, topography, and climate, among other factors. The United States is composed of 10 megaregions. Together they account for three-quarters of the nation’s population, but they make up a fifth of the land located in the contiguous states. Moreover, the U.S. megaregions are more densely settled than are megaregions in Western Europe. It would seem that America’s future is in the policies, planning, and investments aimed at the megaregion scale. To help advance such a proposition, this paper generates population, economic, and employment projections for the nation’s megaregions as well as for the nation as a whole. Implications and recommendations for next steps are offered.
References
1.
NelsonA. C., and LangR. E.. Megapolitan America: A New Vision for Understanding America’s Metropolitan Geography. American Planning Association, Chicago, Ill., 2011.
2.
America 2050, Defining U.S. Megaregions. Regional Planning Association, New York, 2005.
3.
RossC. L.Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning. Georgia Tech Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development, Atlanta, Ga., 2008.
4.
RossC. L., HyltonP. J., and LeeD. J.-H.. Megaregion Planning: State of Practice in Metropolitan Planning Organizations and State Departments of Transportation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2453, 2014, pp. 171–177. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2453-21.
5.
GottmannJ.Megalopolis. The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1961.
6.
America 2050: A Prospectus. Regional Planning Association, New York, 2006.
7.
Department of City and Regional Planning. Megalopolis Unbound: Uniting People, Places & Systems. University of Pennsylvania, School of Design, Philadelphia, 2006.
8.
RossC. L.Megaregions: Literature Review of Organizational Structures and Finance of Multi-Jurisdictional Initiatives and the Implications for Megaregion Transportation Planning in the U.S. Georgia Tech Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development, Atlanta, 2011.
9.
RossC., BarringerJ., YangJ., WooM., DannerA., WestH., AmekudziA., and MeyerM.. Megaregions: Delineating Existing and Emerging Megaregions. FHWA-BAA-HEPP-02-2007. Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development, Atlanta, Ga., 2009.
10.
Beyond Traffic 2045: Trends and Choices. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2015.
11.
Complete Economic and Demographic Data Source. Woods & Poole Economics, Washington, D.C., 2016.
12.
LitmanT.Evaluating Transportation Economic Development Impacts: Understanding How Transport Policy and Planning Decisions Affect Employment, Incomes, Productivity, Competitiveness, Property Values and Tax Revenues. Victoria Policy Institute, Victoria, B.C., Canada, 2016.
13.
PuentesR., and TomerA.. Linking Transportation, Planning, and Economic Growth. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2015.
14.
Megaregions: Surfing the Wave of the Future. Megaregions Subcommittee, TRB Workshop. Presented at 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
15.
WeidnerT., DuccaF., MoeckelR., and MishraS.. Exercising a Megaregion Analysis Framework in the Chesapeake Bay Area. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
16.
PeckettH., and LyonsW. M.. Evolving Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in Transportation Planning for Megaregions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2307, 2012, pp. 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2307-05.
17.
OrfieldM., and Gumus-DawesB.. MPO Reform: A National Agenda for Reforming Metropolitan Governance. Institute on Race and Poverty, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2009.
