Lose Less Instead of Win More: The Failure of Decoupling and Perspectives for Competition in a Degrowth Economy 1

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive explanation for the likely failure in the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradation, and also intends to offer perspectives on the new role of competition in a steady state or a degrowth economy. The analysis is based on five different scenarios, and uses the European Union as an example. It is concluded that we must prepare ourselves for a potential incompatibility between sustainability and economic growth. In this respect one can say that the current EU situation is in some ways already quite close to an economic system without growth, although far from sustainable as yet. Two of the four perspectives developed, regarding the new role of competition in an economy without growth, indicate an increase of direct and indirect competition over resources. The other two perspectives point out that regulatory public intervention as well as financial intervention will increase in order to ensure that - despite the revised role of competition - the poorest are still given a chance to develop (e.g. through basic minimum incomes), even in a degrowth economy.

Keywords

Financial crisis environmental degradation steady state economy sustainable growth European Union

References

Baykan

B.G.

2007. ‘From limits to growth to degrowth within French green politics’. Environmental Politics 16(3): 513–517. CrossRef.

Beckermann

1999. ‘A pro growth perspective’. In van den Bergh

J.C.M.

(ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, pp. 622–634. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Binswanger

, 2001. ‘Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?’ Ecological Economics 36(1): 119–132. CrossRef.

Daly

H.E.

1992a. ‘Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable’. Ecological Economics 6(6): 185–193. CrossRef.

Daly

H.E.

, 1992b. Steady-State Economics. London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Daly

H.E.

1996. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston, Beacon Press.

Devkota

S.R

, 2005. ‘Is strong sustainability operational? An example from Nepal’. Sustainable Development 13(5): 297–310. CrossRef.

Dyllick

and Hockerts

. 2002. ‘Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability’. Business Strategy and Environment 11(2): 130–141. CrossRef.

EEA 2000. Environmental taxes: recent developments in tools for integration. Luxemburg: European Environmental Agency, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/Environmental_Issues_No_18 (accessed 13 December 2009).

10.

EEA 2002. Environmental Signals. Benchmarking the Millenium. Luxemburg: European Environmental Agency,.

11.

EEA 2006. Using the market for cost-effective environmental policy. Luxemburg: European Environmental Agency, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_1 (accessed 13 December 2009).

12.

European Commission 2001a. Proposal of a Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Official Journal C 154 E, 29.5.2001, p. 218.

13.

European Commission 2001b. Communication from the Commission, A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council). COM/2001/0264 final. 17 pp.

14.

European Commission 2007a. Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion. Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/2006/joint_report_en.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

15.

European Commission 2007b. Communication of 22 October 2007 ‘Progress Report on the Sustainable Development Strategy 2007’. COM(2007) 642 final. 14.

16.

European Commission 2008. European Energy and Transport – Trends to 2030. Luxemburg. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/figures/trends_2030_update_2007/energy_transport_trends_2030_update_2007_en.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

17.

European Union, 1993. Resolution of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council of 1 February on a Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development. Official Journal C 138, 07.5.1993 p. 1.

18.

European Union 2002. Decision No. 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Official Journal L 242, 10.9.2002 p. 1.

19.

European Union 2009. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union – Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Protocols – Annexes – Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon – Tables of equivalences. Official Journal C 115, 09/05/2008 P. 0001 - 0388.

20.

European Union Council Environment 2002. 2457th meeting of the EU Council Environment at 17th December 2002 in Luxemburg. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-ReleasesAction.do?reference=PRES/02/320&format=HTML&aged=0&lg=pt&guiLanguage=en (accessed 13 December 2009).

21.

Eurostat 2002. Jahrbuch 2002. Der statistische Wegweiser durch Europa. Luxemburg.

22.

Eurostat 2011. Sustainable development in the European Union; 2011 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy. Luxemburg.

23.

Faber

, Proops

and Baumgärtner

. 1996. ‘The Use of the Entropy Concept in Ecological Economics’, in Faber

, Manstetten

, Proops

, Ecological Economics: Concepts and Methods, pp. 115–135. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. PMid:9027423.

24.

FAO 2000. The Energy and Agriculture Nexus – Environment and Natural Resources Working Paper No. 4, Rome. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X8054E/X8054E00.HTM (accessed 13 December 2009).

25.

Giljum

, Hak

, Hinterberger

and Kovanda

. 2005. ‘Environmental governance in the European Union: strategies and instruments for absolute decoupling’. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1/2): 31–46. CrossRef.

26.

Giljum

, Behrens

, Hinterberger

, Lutz

and Meyer

. 2008. ‘Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe’. Environmental Science & Policy 11(3): 204–216. CrossRef.

27.

Gowdy

, McDaniel

, 1999. ‘The physical destruction of Nauru: an example of weak sustainability’. Land Economics 75(2): 333–338. CrossRef.

28.

van Griethuysen

, 2010. ‘Why are we growth-addicted? The hard way towards degrowth in the involutionary western development path.’ Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 590–595. CrossRef.

29.

Hauser

J.A.

1992. ‘Population, Ecology and the New Economics’. Futures 24(4): 364–387. CrossRef.

30.

Howard

M.W.

2007. ‘A NAFTA dividend: A guaranteed minimum income for North America’. Basic Income Studies 2(1): 1–10. CrossRef.

31.

IMF 2007. World Economic Outlook – Globalisation and Inequality, Washington D.C., http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2007/02/pdf/text.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

32.

Jackson

and Marks

. 1994. Measuring Sustainable Economic Welfare – a Pilot Index: 1950-1990, Stockholm/London: Stockholm Environment Institute/New Economics Foundation.

33.

Jones

1999. ‘Competitive and sustainable growth: logic and inconsistency’. Journal of European Public Policy 6(6): 359–375. CrossRef.

34.

Kallis

, Schneider

and Martinez-Alier

, 2009. ‘Sustainable De-growth’. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Ljubljana/Slovenia, 29 June-2 July 2009. http://www.esee2009.si/papers/Kallis%20-%20Sustainable%20De-growth.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

35.

Kerschner

2009. ‘Economic De-growth vs. Steady-State Economy’. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological, Ljubljana/Slovenia, 29th June - 2nd July 2009 http://www.esee2009.si/papers/Kerschner%20-%20Economic%20De-growth.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

36.

Latouche

, 2004. ‘Why less should be so much more? Degrowth economics’. Le Monde Diplomatique, English Edition 17 November 2004. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/25/126.html (accessed 13 December 2009).

37.

Latouche

, 2010. ‘Editorial: Degrowth’ Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 519–522. CrossRef.

38.

Matsaganis

and Flevotomou

. 2007. ‘A Basic Income for Housing? Simulating a Universal Housing Transfer in the Netherlands and Sweden’. Basic Income Studies 2(2): 1–25.

39.

Martinez-Alier

, Munda

and O'Neill

. 2001. ‘Theories and methods in ecological economics: a tentative classification’. In: Cleveland

C.J.

, Stern

D.I.

and Costanza

(eds.), The Economics of Nature and the Nature of Economics, pp. 35–56. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

40.

Martinez-Alier

, Pascual

, Vivien

F.-D.

and Zaccai

, 2010. ‘Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm.’ Ecological Economics 69(9): 1741–1747. CrossRef.

41.

Mauerhofer

, 2008. ‘3-D Sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a Sustainable Development’. Ecological Economics 64(3): 496–506. CrossRef.

42.

Mauerhofer

, 2010. Social capital, capacity and carrying capacity: exploring basics of ‘socially sustainable economic degrowth’. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, University of Barcelona, 26-29 March 2010. http://barcelona.degrowth.org/ (accessed 6 November 2012).

43.

Max-Neef

1995. ‘Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis’. Ecological Economics 15(2): 115–118. CrossRef.

44.

de Mooij

R.A.

and van den Bergh

J.C.J.M.

, 2002. ‘Growth and the environment in Europe: a guide to the debate’. Empirica 29(2): 79–91. CrossRef.

45.

OECD, 2002. Sustainable Development: Indicators for measuring decoupling of environmental pressure from economics growth. Report, SG/SD(2002)1/FINAL, Paris.

46.

Rosenberg

and Oegema

, 1995. ‘A Pilot Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for the Netherlands, 1950 – 1992’, Institute for Environment and Systems Analysis, Amsterdam (quoted as ‘forthcoming’ by Max-Neef 1995).

47.

Scholtens

2001. ‘Borrowing green: economic and environmental effects of green fiscal policy in The Netherlands’. Ecological Economics 39(3): 425–435. CrossRef.

48.

Schneider

, Kallis

and Joan Martinez-Alier

, 2010. ‘Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue.’ Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 511–518. CrossRef.

49.

Scott

1998. EC Environmental Law. London and New York: Longman.

50.

Sorrell

and Dimitropoulos

. 2008. ‘The rebound effect: Mcroeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions’. Ecological Economics 65(3): 636–649. CrossRef.

51.

Stockhammer

, Hochreiter

, Obermayer

and Steiner

. 1999. ‘The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) as an alternative to GDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955–1992’. Ecological Economics 21(1): 19–34. CrossRef.

52.

Spangenberg

J.H.

, Omann

and Hinterberger

. 2002. ‘Sustainable growth criteria - Minimum benchmarks and scenarios for employment and the environment’. Ecological Economics 42(3): 429–443. CrossRef.

53.

Steurer

, Berger

and Hametner

, 2010. ‘The vertical integration of Lisbon and sustainable development strategies across the EU: How different governance architectures shape the European coherence of policy documents’. Natural Resources Forum 34(1) 71–84. CrossRef.

54.

Wissenburg

2006. ‘Global and ecological justice: Prioritising conflicting demands’. Environmental Values 15(4): 425–439. CrossRef.

55.

World Bank 1992. World Development Report 1992. New York: Oxford University Press.

56.

WWF and Global Footprint Network, 2007. Europe 2007 - Gross Domestic Product and Ecological Footprint, http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/europe_2007_gdp_and_ef.pdf (accessed 13 December 2009).

57.

Ziegler

2007. ‘Political perception and ensemble of macro objectives and measures: The paradox of the Index for Sustainable Economic Welfare’, Environmental Values 16(1): 43–60. CrossRef.